These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37813195)
1. Testing 2 Alternative Time Trade-Off Methods for Valuation of Children's Health States. Yang Z; Devlin NJ; Rand K; Luo N Value Health; 2024 Jan; 27(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 37813195 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Using Time Trade-Off Values to Estimate EQ-5D-Y Value Sets: An Exploratory Study. Yang Z; Jiang J; Wang P; Wu J; Fang Y; Feng D; Xi X; Luo N Value Health; 2023 Jul; 26(7):968-973. PubMed ID: 36921897 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. How different are composite and traditional TTO valuations of severe EQ-5D-5L states? Xie F; Pullenayegum E; Gaebel K; Bansback N; Bryan S; Ohinmaa A; Poissant L; Johnson JA Qual Life Res; 2016 Aug; 25(8):2101-8. PubMed ID: 26875190 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Exploring non-iterative time trade-off methods for valuation of EQ-5D-5L health states. Yang Z; Rand K; Stolk E; Busschbach J; Luo N Eur J Health Econ; 2024 Sep; 25(7):1087-1094. PubMed ID: 38104294 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Estimating an EQ-5D-Y-3L Value Set for China. Yang Z; Jiang J; Wang P; Jin X; Wu J; Fang Y; Feng D; Xi X; Li S; Jing M; Zheng B; Huang W; Luo N Pharmacoeconomics; 2022 Dec; 40(Suppl 2):147-155. PubMed ID: 36396878 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Valuation of the EQ-5D-5L with composite time trade-off for the German population - an exploratory study. Ludwig K; von der Schulenburg JG; Greiner W Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2017 Feb; 15(1):39. PubMed ID: 28219389 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Time and lexicographic preferences in the valuation of EQ-5D-Y with time trade-off methodology. Lipman SA; Zhang L; Shah KK; Attema AE Eur J Health Econ; 2023 Mar; 24(2):293-305. PubMed ID: 35596831 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Estimating an EQ-5D-Y-3L Value Set for Indonesia by Mapping the DCE onto TTO Values. Fitriana TS; Roudijk B; Purba FD; Busschbach JJV; Stolk E Pharmacoeconomics; 2022 Dec; 40(Suppl 2):157-167. PubMed ID: 36348155 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Valuation of EuroQol Five-Dimensional Questionnaire, Youth Version (EQ-5D-Y) and EuroQol Five-Dimensional Questionnaire, Three-Level Version (EQ-5D-3L) Health States: The Impact of Wording and Perspective. Kreimeier S; Oppe M; Ramos-Goñi JM; Cole A; Devlin N; Herdman M; Mulhern B; Shah KK; Stolk E; Rivero-Arias O; Greiner W Value Health; 2018 Nov; 21(11):1291-1298. PubMed ID: 30442276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of Value Set Based on DCE and/or TTO Data: Scoring for EQ-5D-5L Health States in Japan. Shiroiwa T; Ikeda S; Noto S; Igarashi A; Fukuda T; Saito S; Shimozuma K Value Health; 2016; 19(5):648-54. PubMed ID: 27565282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A shortcut to mean-based time tradeoff tariffs for the EQ-5D? Rand-Hendriksen K; Augestad LA; Dahl FA; Kristiansen IS; Stavem K Med Decis Making; 2012; 32(4):569-77. PubMed ID: 22247424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Self vs. other, child vs. adult. An experimental comparison of valuation perspectives for valuation of EQ-5D-Y-3L health states. Lipman SA; Reckers-Droog VT; Karimi M; Jakubczyk M; Attema AE Eur J Health Econ; 2021 Dec; 22(9):1507-1518. PubMed ID: 34611793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of online and face-to-face valuation of the EQ-5D-5L using composite time trade-off. Jiang R; Shaw J; Mühlbacher A; Lee TA; Walton S; Kohlmann T; Norman R; Pickard AS Qual Life Res; 2021 May; 30(5):1433-1444. PubMed ID: 33247810 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Testing "Pits" Time Trade-Off: Can Data Quality be Improved by Removing Death From Valuation of Health States? Liao M; Yang Z; Rand K; Luo N Value Health; 2024 Sep; 27(9):1261-1269. PubMed ID: 38795961 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. 'Like holding the axe on who should live or not': adolescents' and adults' perceptions of valuing children's health states using a standardised valuation protocol for the EQ-5D-Y-3L. Åström M; Conte H; Berg J; Burström K Qual Life Res; 2022 Jul; 31(7):2133-2142. PubMed ID: 35201557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Parallel Valuation: A Direct Comparison of EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L Societal Value Sets. Law EH; Pickard AS; Xie F; Walton SM; Lee TA; Schwartz A Med Decis Making; 2018 Nov; 38(8):968-982. PubMed ID: 30403577 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Similar responses to EQ-5D-3L by two elicitation methods: visual analogue scale and time trade-off. Wang X; Zhuo L; Ma Y; Cai T; Must A; Xu L; Zhuo L BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 May; 20(1):118. PubMed ID: 32410582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. International Valuation Protocol for the EQ-5D-Y-3L. Ramos-Goñi JM; Oppe M; Stolk E; Shah K; Kreimeier S; Rivero-Arias O; Devlin N Pharmacoeconomics; 2020 Jul; 38(7):653-663. PubMed ID: 32297224 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Randomised comparison of online interviews versus face-to-face interviews to value health states. Peasgood T; Bourke M; Devlin N; Rowen D; Yang Y; Dalziel K Soc Sci Med; 2023 Apr; 323():115818. PubMed ID: 36940582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Preparatory study for the revaluation of the EQ-5D tariff: methodology report. Mulhern B; Bansback N; Brazier J; Buckingham K; Cairns J; Devlin N; Dolan P; Hole AR; Kavetsos G; Longworth L; Rowen D; Tsuchiya A Health Technol Assess; 2014 Feb; 18(12):vii-xxvi, 1-191. PubMed ID: 24568945 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]