149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37813279)
1. Evaluation of A Computer-Aided Detection Software for Prostate Cancer Prediction: Excellent Diagnostic Accuracy Independent of Preanalytical Factors.
Vazzano J; Johansson D; Hu K; Eurén K; Elfwing S; Parwani A; Zhou M
Lab Invest; 2023 Dec; 103(12):100257. PubMed ID: 37813279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical Validation of Artificial Intelligence-Augmented Pathology Diagnosis Demonstrates Significant Gains in Diagnostic Accuracy in Prostate Cancer Detection.
Raciti P; Sue J; Retamero JA; Ceballos R; Godrich R; Kunz JD; Casson A; Thiagarajan D; Ebrahimzadeh Z; Viret J; Lee D; Schüffler PJ; DeMuth G; Gulturk E; Kanan C; Rothrock B; Reis-Filho J; Klimstra DS; Reuter V; Fuchs TJ
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2023 Oct; 147(10):1178-1185. PubMed ID: 36538386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Novel artificial intelligence system increases the detection of prostate cancer in whole slide images of core needle biopsies.
Raciti P; Sue J; Ceballos R; Godrich R; Kunz JD; Kapur S; Reuter V; Grady L; Kanan C; Klimstra DS; Fuchs TJ
Mod Pathol; 2020 Oct; 33(10):2058-2066. PubMed ID: 32393768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An artificial intelligence algorithm for prostate cancer diagnosis in whole slide images of core needle biopsies: a blinded clinical validation and deployment study.
Pantanowitz L; Quiroga-Garza GM; Bien L; Heled R; Laifenfeld D; Linhart C; Sandbank J; Albrecht Shach A; Shalev V; Vecsler M; Michelow P; Hazelhurst S; Dhir R
Lancet Digit Health; 2020 Aug; 2(8):e407-e416. PubMed ID: 33328045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An independent assessment of an artificial intelligence system for prostate cancer detection shows strong diagnostic accuracy.
Perincheri S; Levi AW; Celli R; Gershkovich P; Rimm D; Morrow JS; Rothrock B; Raciti P; Klimstra D; Sinard J
Mod Pathol; 2021 Aug; 34(8):1588-1595. PubMed ID: 33782551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Development and Validation of an Artificial Intelligence-Powered Platform for Prostate Cancer Grading and Quantification.
Huang W; Randhawa R; Jain P; Iczkowski KA; Hu R; Hubbard S; Eickhoff J; Basu H; Roy R
JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Nov; 4(11):e2132554. PubMed ID: 34730818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fast cross-staining alignment of gigapixel whole slide images with application to prostate cancer and breast cancer analysis.
Wang CW; Lee YC; Khalil MA; Lin KY; Yu CP; Lien HC
Sci Rep; 2022 Jul; 12(1):11623. PubMed ID: 35803996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An Artificial Intelligence-based Support Tool for Automation and Standardisation of Gleason Grading in Prostate Biopsies.
Marginean F; Arvidsson I; Simoulis A; Christian Overgaard N; Åström K; Heyden A; Bjartell A; Krzyzanowska A
Eur Urol Focus; 2021 Sep; 7(5):995-1001. PubMed ID: 33303404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of whole slide image immunohistochemistry interpretation in challenging prostate needle biopsies.
Fine JL; Grzybicki DM; Silowash R; Ho J; Gilbertson JR; Anthony L; Wilson R; Parwani AV; Bastacky SI; Epstein JI; Jukic DM
Hum Pathol; 2008 Apr; 39(4):564-72. PubMed ID: 18234276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of whole slide image based image analysis is adversely affected by preanalytical factors such as stained tissue slide and paraffin block age.
Shaker N; Sardana R; Hamasaki S; Nohle DG; Ayers LW; Parwani AV
J Pathol Inform; 2022; 13():100121. PubMed ID: 36268058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Utility of whole slide imaging and virtual microscopy in prostate pathology.
Camparo P; Egevad L; Algaba F; Berney DM; Boccon-Gibod L; Compérat E; Evans AJ; Grobholz R; Kristiansen G; Langner C; Lopez-Beltran A; Montironi R; Oliveira P; Vainer B; Varma M
APMIS; 2012 Apr; 120(4):298-304. PubMed ID: 22429212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Development and validation of artificial intelligence-based prescreening of large-bowel biopsies taken in the UK and Portugal: a retrospective cohort study.
Bilal M; Tsang YW; Ali M; Graham S; Hero E; Wahab N; Dodd K; Sahota H; Wu S; Lu W; Jahanifar M; Robinson A; Azam A; Benes K; Nimir M; Hewitt K; Bhalerao A; Eldaly H; Raza SEA; Gopalakrishnan K; Minhas F; Snead D; Rajpoot N
Lancet Digit Health; 2023 Nov; 5(11):e786-e797. PubMed ID: 37890902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Multiparametric MRI in detection and staging of prostate cancer.
Boesen L
Dan Med J; 2017 Feb; 64(2):. PubMed ID: 28157066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Independent real-world application of a clinical-grade automated prostate cancer detection system.
da Silva LM; Pereira EM; Salles PG; Godrich R; Ceballos R; Kunz JD; Casson A; Viret J; Chandarlapaty S; Ferreira CG; Ferrari B; Rothrock B; Raciti P; Reuter V; Dogdas B; DeMuth G; Sue J; Kanan C; Grady L; Fuchs TJ; Reis-Filho JS
J Pathol; 2021 Jun; 254(2):147-158. PubMed ID: 33904171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Signature maps for automatic identification of prostate cancer from colorimetric analysis of H&E- and IHC-stained histopathological specimens.
Leng E; Henriksen JC; Rizzardi AE; Jin J; Nam JW; Brassuer BM; Johnson AD; Reder NP; Koopmeiners JS; Schmechel SC; Metzger GJ
Sci Rep; 2019 May; 9(1):6992. PubMed ID: 31061447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Development of a Deep Learning Algorithm for the Histopathologic Diagnosis and Gleason Grading of Prostate Cancer Biopsies: A Pilot Study.
Kott O; Linsley D; Amin A; Karagounis A; Jeffers C; Golijanin D; Serre T; Gershman B
Eur Urol Focus; 2021 Mar; 7(2):347-351. PubMed ID: 31767543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Algorithm for Gleason Grading of Prostate Cancer From Biopsy Specimens.
Nagpal K; Foote D; Tan F; Liu Y; Chen PC; Steiner DF; Manoj N; Olson N; Smith JL; Mohtashamian A; Peterson B; Amin MB; Evans AJ; Sweet JW; Cheung C; van der Kwast T; Sangoi AR; Zhou M; Allan R; Humphrey PA; Hipp JD; Gadepalli K; Corrado GS; Peng LH; Stumpe MC; Mermel CH
JAMA Oncol; 2020 Sep; 6(9):1372-1380. PubMed ID: 32701148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of Artificial Intelligence Techniques to Evaluate Performance of a Classifier for Automatic Grading of Prostate Cancer From Digitized Histopathologic Images.
Nir G; Karimi D; Goldenberg SL; Fazli L; Skinnider BF; Tavassoli P; Turbin D; Villamil CF; Wang G; Thompson DJS; Black PC; Salcudean SE
JAMA Netw Open; 2019 Mar; 2(3):e190442. PubMed ID: 30848813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A promising deep learning-assistive algorithm for histopathological screening of colorectal cancer.
Ho C; Zhao Z; Chen XF; Sauer J; Saraf SA; Jialdasani R; Taghipour K; Sathe A; Khor LY; Lim KH; Leow WQ
Sci Rep; 2022 Feb; 12(1):2222. PubMed ID: 35140318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
