127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37813746)
1. Corporal Skip Metastases in Penile Squamous Cell Carcinoma: An Unknown and Distinct Pattern of Spread with Poor Prognosis.
Elst L; Vreeburg MTA; de Vries HM; Vandermaesen K; Murphy T; Churchill J; Fallara G; Sanchez D; Falcone M; Garcia-Perdomo HA; Pettaway C; Hakenberg O; Johnstone P; Spiess PE; Muneer A; Sangar V; Parnham A; Ayres B; Watkin N; Brouwer OR; Albersen M
Eur Urol Oncol; 2024 Jun; 7(3):478-484. PubMed ID: 37813746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prognostic Value of Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio in Penile Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients Undergoing Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection.
Azizi M; Peyton CC; Boulware DC; Chipollini J; Juwono T; Pow-Sang JM; Spiess PE
Eur Urol Focus; 2019 Nov; 5(6):1085-1090. PubMed ID: 29937330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Development and external validation of a prognostic tool for prediction of cancer-specific mortality after complete loco-regional pathological staging for squamous cell carcinoma of the penis.
Sun M; Djajadiningrat RS; Alnajjar HM; Trinh QD; Graafland NM; Watkin N; Karakiewicz PI; Horenblas S
BJU Int; 2015 Nov; 116(5):734-43. PubMed ID: 24552303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Lymph node metastasis in intermediate-risk penile squamous cell cancer: a two-centre experience.
Hughes BE; Leijte JA; Kroon BK; Shabbir MA; Swallow TW; Heenan SD; Corbishley CM; van Boven HH; Perry MJ; Watkin NA; Horenblas S
Eur Urol; 2010 Apr; 57(4):688-92. PubMed ID: 19647926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Preoperative plasma IGFBP2 is associated with nodal metastasis in patients with penile squamous cell carcinoma.
Hu X; Chen M; Liu W; Li Y; Fu J
Urol Oncol; 2019 Jul; 37(7):452-461. PubMed ID: 31053522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The risk factors for the presence of pelvic lymph node metastasis in penile squamous cell carcinoma patients with inguinal lymph node dissection.
Liu JY; Li YH; Zhang ZL; Yao K; Ye YL; Xie D; Han H; Liu ZW; Qin ZK; Zhou FJ
World J Urol; 2013 Dec; 31(6):1519-24. PubMed ID: 23455885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. DaPeCa-7: comparative assessment of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (CT) and conventional diagnostic CT in diagnosis of lymph node metastases, distant metastases and incidental findings in patients with invasive penile cancer.
Jakobsen JK; Frahm Nielsen T; Ipsen P; Albrecht-Beste E; Cardoso Costa J; Alslev L; Predbjørn Krarup K; Grønkaer Toft B; Høyer S; Bouchelouche K; Bjerggaard Jensen J
BJU Int; 2021 Feb; 127(2):254-262. PubMed ID: 33448605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prognostic factors in invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the penis: analysis of 196 patients treated at the Brazilian National Cancer Institute.
Ornellas AA; Nóbrega BL; Wei Kin Chin E; Wisnescky A; da Silva PC; de Santos Schwindt AB
J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4):1354-9. PubMed ID: 18707720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clear-cell differentiation and lymphatic invasion, but not the revised TNM classification, predict lymph node metastases in pT1 penile cancer: a clinicopathologic study of 76 patients from a low incidence area.
Mannweiler S; Sygulla S; Tsybrovskyy O; Razmara Y; Pummer K; Regauer S
Urol Oncol; 2013 Oct; 31(7):1378-85. PubMed ID: 22421354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Predictors of local recurrence and its impact on survival after glansectomy for penile cancer: time to challenge the dogma?
Roussel E; Peeters E; Vanthoor J; Bozzini G; Muneer A; Ayres B; Sri D; Watkin N; Bhattar R; Parnham A; Sangar V; Lau M; Joice G; Bivalacqua TJ; Chipollini J; Spiess PE; Hatzichristodoulou G; de Vries L; Brouwer O; Albersen M;
BJU Int; 2021 May; 127(5):606-613. PubMed ID: 33180969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prognostic factors for occult inguinal lymph node involvement in penile carcinoma and assessment of the high-risk EAU subgroup: a two-institution analysis of 342 clinically node-negative patients.
Graafland NM; Lam W; Leijte JA; Yap T; Gallee MP; Corbishley C; van Werkhoven E; Watkin N; Horenblas S
Eur Urol; 2010 Nov; 58(5):742-7. PubMed ID: 20800339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Factors associated with regional recurrence after lymph node dissection for penile squamous cell carcinoma.
Reddy JP; Pettaway CA; Levy LB; Pagliaro LC; Tamboli P; Rao P; Jayaratna I; Hoffman KE
BJU Int; 2017 Apr; 119(4):591-597. PubMed ID: 27753187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. More lymph node dissection improves survival in patients with newly diagnosed lymph node-positive penile cancer.
Mao W; Huang X; Kong M; Fan J; Geng J
Int Urol Nephrol; 2019 Apr; 51(4):641-654. PubMed ID: 30758771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ten-year surgical experiences with penile cancer at a tertiary care hospital in northwestern Tanzania: a retrospective study of 236 patients.
Chalya PL; Rambau PF; Masalu N; Simbila S
World J Surg Oncol; 2015 Feb; 13():71. PubMed ID: 25889238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prognostic risk stratification derived from individual patient level data for men with advanced penile squamous cell carcinoma receiving first-line systemic therapy.
Pond GR; Di Lorenzo G; Necchi A; Eigl BJ; Kolinsky MP; Chacko RT; Dorff TB; Harshman LC; Milowsky MI; Lee RJ; Galsky MD; Federico P; Bolger G; DeShazo M; Mehta A; Goyal J; Sonpavde G
Urol Oncol; 2014 May; 32(4):501-8. PubMed ID: 24332646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Patterns of Recurrence following Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection for Penile Cancer: Optimizing Surveillance Strategies.
Chakiryan NH; Dahmen A; Bandini M; Pederzoli F; Marandino L; Albersen M; Roussel E; Zhu Y; Ye DW; Ornellas AA; Catanzaro M; Hakenberg OW; Heidenreich A; Haidl F; Watkin N; Ager M; Chahoud J; Briganti A; Salvioni R; Montorsi F; Necchi A; Spiess PE
J Urol; 2021 Oct; 206(4):960-969. PubMed ID: 34032492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Lymphatic and vascular embolizations are independent predictive variables of inguinal lymph node involvement in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the penis: Gruppo Uro-Oncologico del Nord Est (Northeast Uro-Oncological Group) Penile Cancer data base data.
Ficarra V; Zattoni F; Cunico SC; Galetti TP; Luciani L; Fandella A; Guazzieri S; Maruzzi D; Sava T; Siracusano S; Pilloni S; Tasca A; Martignoni G; Gardiman M; Tardanico R; Zambolin T; Cisternino A; Artibani W;
Cancer; 2005 Jun; 103(12):2507-16. PubMed ID: 15856474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ki-67, mini-chromosome maintenance 2 protein (MCM2) and geminin have no independent prognostic relevance for cancer-specific survival in surgically treated squamous cell carcinoma of the penis.
May M; Burger M; Otto W; Hakenberg OW; Wieland WF; May D; Hofstädter F; Götz S; Niessl N; Fritsche HM; Birnkammer K; Gilfrich C; Peter J; Jain A; Koch S; Lebentrau S; Riedmiller H; Rössler W; Denzinger S; Brookman-May S; Gunia S
BJU Int; 2013 Aug; 112(4):E383-90. PubMed ID: 23305250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Carcinoma of the penis--appraisal of a modified tumour-staging system.
Heyns CF; van Vollenhoven P; Steenkamp JW; Allen FJ; van Velden DJ
Br J Urol; 1997 Aug; 80(2):307-12. PubMed ID: 9284207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The role of histologic subtype, p16(INK4a) expression, and presence of human papillomavirus DNA in penile squamous cell carcinoma.
Steinestel J; Al Ghazal A; Arndt A; Schnoeller TJ; Schrader AJ; Moeller P; Steinestel K
BMC Cancer; 2015 Apr; 15():220. PubMed ID: 25885064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
