These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37813771)

  • 1. The ideal shape of the female jaw angle: An online survey.
    Mommaerts MY; Cleymaet R
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2023 Oct; 51(10):597-602. PubMed ID: 37813771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Psychometric and Perceptometric Comparisons of the Perspectives of Orthodontists, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons, and Laypeople of Different Ages and Sexes towards Beauty of Female Jaw Angles (Intergonial Widths and Gonial Heights) on Frontal and Three-Quarter Views.
    Moradinejad M; Rekabi A; Ashtiani AH; Atashkar N; Rakhshan V
    Biomed Res Int; 2022; 2022():2595662. PubMed ID: 36398071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The ideal male jaw angle--An Internet survey.
    Mommaerts MY
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2016 Apr; 44(4):381-91. PubMed ID: 26888465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparisons of Jaw Line and Face Line after Mandibular Setback: Intraoral Vertical Ramus versus Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomies.
    Chen CM; Tseng YC; Ko EC; Chen MY; Chen KJ; Cheng JH
    Biomed Res Int; 2018; 2018():1375085. PubMed ID: 30662900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Ideals of Facial Beauty Among Chinese Aesthetic Practitioners: Results from a Large National Survey.
    Samizadeh S
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2019 Feb; 43(1):102-114. PubMed ID: 30288564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Frontal soft tissue analysis using a 3 dimensional camera following two-jaw rotational orthognathic surgery in skeletal class III patients.
    Choi JW; Lee JY; Oh TS; Kwon SM; Yang SJ; Koh KS
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Apr; 42(3):220-6. PubMed ID: 23870714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessing the influence of mandibular prominence on perceived attractiveness in the orthognathic patient, clinician, and layperson.
    Naini FB; Donaldson AN; Cobourne MT; McDonald F
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Dec; 34(6):738-46. PubMed ID: 21846874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Three-dimensional aesthetic assessment of class II patients before and after orthognathic surgery and its association with quantitative surgical changes.
    Storms AS; Vansant L; Shaheen E; Coucke W; de Llano-Pérula MC; Jacobs R; Politis C; Willems G
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Dec; 46(12):1664-1671. PubMed ID: 28751183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Adjunctive Aesthetic Procedures in Orthognathic Surgery.
    Jansma J; Schepers RH
    Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am; 2023 Feb; 35(1):139-152. PubMed ID: 36336602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impact of facial components on the attractiveness of face: A perception-based study.
    Parul P; Kumar M; Goyal M; Mishra S; Shaha K; Abrar M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2022 Nov; 162(5):e218-e229. PubMed ID: 36031510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Nasolabial angle and orthognathic surgery.
    Garcia C; Olivi P
    Int Orthod; 2015 Mar; 13(1):43-60. PubMed ID: 25665905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Quantitative Approach to Determining the Ideal Female Lip Aesthetic and Its Effect on Facial Attractiveness.
    Popenko NA; Tripathi PB; Devcic Z; Karimi K; Osann K; Wong BJF
    JAMA Facial Plast Surg; 2017 Jul; 19(4):261-267. PubMed ID: 28208179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of preferred lip position according to different tip rotations of the nose in class I young adult subjects.
    Feghali J; Khoury E; Souccar NM; Akl R; Ghoubril J
    Int Orthod; 2019 Sep; 17(3):478-487. PubMed ID: 31231000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Effects of Maxillary Movements on Nasal Aesthetics Following Orthognathic Surgery.
    Üstün GG; Konaş E; El H; Akarsu Güven B; Dağ O; Kamburoğlu H; Mavili ME
    J Craniofac Surg; 2020; 31(3):796-800. PubMed ID: 31934978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Correction of square jaw with low angles using mandibular "V-line" ostectomy combined with outer cortex ostectomy.
    Hsu YC; Li J; Hu J; Luo E; Hsu MS; Zhu S
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Feb; 109(2):197-202. PubMed ID: 20005752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinician, dental student, and orthognathic patient perception of black-and-white silhouette lateral profile dimensions of ideal chin position in a Chinese population.
    Jiang Z; Tan L; Hu L; Wang C; Wang H; Xie Z
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2018 Jan; 125(1):e1-e7. PubMed ID: 29153275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The aesthetic impact of upper lip inclination in orthodontics and orthognathic surgery.
    Naini FB; Cobourne MT; McDonald F; Wertheim D
    Eur J Orthod; 2015 Feb; 37(1):81-6. PubMed ID: 25016578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of parameters related with upper lip aesthetics and dynamic smile following Le Fort I osteotomy.
    Dilaver E; Suzen M; Uckan S
    J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2022 Oct; 123(5):566-571. PubMed ID: 35568121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Esthetic preferences of orthodontists, dentists, and plastic surgeons for balanced facial profiles.
    Milutinovic J; Aleksic E; Avramov S; Kalevski K; Gajic M; Pejanovic D; Milic J
    J Oral Sci; 2023 Mar; 65(2):73-76. PubMed ID: 36823034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Three-dimensional study of facial soft tissue changes in patients with skeletal Class
    Shi Y; Shang H; Tian L; Bai S; Liu W; Liu Y
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2018 May; 32(5):612-616. PubMed ID: 29806352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.