These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3781421)

  • 1. The value and limitations of short-term genotoxicity assays and the inadequacy of current criteria for selecting chemicals for cancer bioassays.
    Ashby J
    Food Chem Toxicol; 1986; 24(6-7):663-6. PubMed ID: 3781421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mouse-specific carcinogens: an assessment of hazard and significance for validation of short-term carcinogenicity bioassays in transgenic mice.
    Battershill JM; Fielder RJ
    Hum Exp Toxicol; 1998 Apr; 17(4):193-205. PubMed ID: 9617631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The prospects for a simplified and internationally harmonized approach to the detection of possible human carcinogens and mutagens.
    Ashby J
    Mutagenesis; 1986 Jan; 1(1):3-16. PubMed ID: 3325732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How to reduce false positive results when undertaking in vitro genotoxicity testing and thus avoid unnecessary follow-up animal tests: Report of an ECVAM Workshop.
    Kirkland D; Pfuhler S; Tweats D; Aardema M; Corvi R; Darroudi F; Elhajouji A; Glatt H; Hastwell P; Hayashi M; Kasper P; Kirchner S; Lynch A; Marzin D; Maurici D; Meunier JR; Müller L; Nohynek G; Parry J; Parry E; Thybaud V; Tice R; van Benthem J; Vanparys P; White P
    Mutat Res; 2007 Mar; 628(1):31-55. PubMed ID: 17293159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The results of assays in Drosophila as indicators of exposure to carcinogens.
    Vogel EW; Graf U; Frei HJ; Nivard MM
    IARC Sci Publ; 1999; (146):427-70. PubMed ID: 10353398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens I. Sensitivity, specificity and relative predictivity.
    Kirkland D; Aardema M; Henderson L; Müller L
    Mutat Res; 2005 Jul; 584(1-2):1-256. PubMed ID: 15979392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A core in vitro genotoxicity battery comprising the Ames test plus the in vitro micronucleus test is sufficient to detect rodent carcinogens and in vivo genotoxins.
    Kirkland D; Reeve L; Gatehouse D; Vanparys P
    Mutat Res; 2011 Mar; 721(1):27-73. PubMed ID: 21238603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens II. Further analysis of mammalian cell results, relative predictivity and tumour profiles.
    Kirkland D; Aardema M; Müller L; Makoto H
    Mutat Res; 2006 Sep; 608(1):29-42. PubMed ID: 16769241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Classification according to chemical structure, mutagenicity to Salmonella and level of carcinogenicity of a further 42 chemicals tested for carcinogenicity by the U.S. National Toxicology Program.
    Ashby J; Tennant RW; Zeiger E; Stasiewicz S
    Mutat Res; 1989 Jun; 223(2):73-103. PubMed ID: 2662004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Chemical structure, Salmonella mutagenicity and extent of carcinogenicity as indicators of genotoxic carcinogenesis among 222 chemicals tested in rodents by the U.S. NCI/NTP.
    Ashby J; Tennant RW
    Mutat Res; 1988 Jan; 204(1):17-115. PubMed ID: 3277047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Can in vitro mammalian cell genotoxicity test results be used to complement positive results in the Ames test and help predict carcinogenic or in vivo genotoxic activity? II. Construction and analysis of a consolidated database.
    Kirkland D; Zeiger E; Madia F; Corvi R
    Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen; 2014 Dec; 775-776():69-80. PubMed ID: 25435357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Genetic toxicology: can we design predictive in vivo assays?
    Clive D
    Mutat Res; 1988; 205(1-4):313-30. PubMed ID: 3285193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Testing strategies in mutagenicity and genetic toxicology: an appraisal of the guidelines of the European Scientific Committee for Cosmetics and Non-Food Products for the evaluation of hair dyes.
    Kirkland DJ; Henderson L; Marzin D; Müller L; Parry JM; Speit G; Tweats DJ; Williams GM
    Mutat Res; 2005 Dec; 588(2):88-105. PubMed ID: 16326131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Genetic toxicology in industry: perspectives and initiatives.
    Ashby J
    Food Chem Toxicol; 1985 Jan; 23(1):43-5. PubMed ID: 3882532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Updated recommended lists of genotoxic and non-genotoxic chemicals for assessment of the performance of new or improved genotoxicity tests.
    Kirkland D; Kasper P; Martus HJ; Müller L; van Benthem J; Madia F; Corvi R
    Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen; 2016 Jan; 795():7-30. PubMed ID: 26774663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The unique role of rodents in the detection of possible human carcinogens and mutagens.
    Ashby J
    Mutat Res; 1983 Jun; 115(2):177-213. PubMed ID: 6343849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The predictivity of animal bioassays and short-term genotoxicity tests for carcinogenicity and non-carcinogenicity to humans.
    Ennever FK; Noonan TJ; Rosenkranz HS
    Mutagenesis; 1987 Mar; 2(2):73-8. PubMed ID: 3331705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Salmonella mutagenicity and rodent carcinogenicity: quantitative structure-activity relationships.
    Blake BW; Enslein K; Gombar VK; Borgstedt HH
    Mutat Res; 1990 Jul; 241(3):261-71. PubMed ID: 2195334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Are tumor incidence rates from chronic bioassays telling us what we need to know about carcinogens?
    Gaylor DW
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2005 Mar; 41(2):128-33. PubMed ID: 15698536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An integrative test strategy for cancer hazard identification.
    Luijten M; Olthof ED; Hakkert BC; Rorije E; van der Laan JW; Woutersen RA; van Benthem J
    Crit Rev Toxicol; 2016 Aug; 46(7):615-39. PubMed ID: 27142259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.