These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

76 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3781464)

  • 1. The principles of pressure drop in long segment stenosis.
    Goldberg SJ
    Herz; 1986 Oct; 11(5):291-5. PubMed ID: 3781464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Doppler echocardiography determination of the severity of tricuspid valve stenosis].
    Dennig K; Kraus F; Rudolph W
    Herz; 1986 Dec; 11(6):332-6. PubMed ID: 3817725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy of the simplified Bernoulli relationship in measuring pressure gradients across stenosis.
    Rieu R; Pelissier R; Isaaz K
    Int Angiol; 1989; 8(4):210-5. PubMed ID: 2699483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Differentiated evaluation of heart valve stenosis by expanded Bernoulli equation--in vitro studies of model stenoses].
    Wendt MO; Pohl M; Werner S; Kühnel R; Toppel D
    Z Kardiol; 1995 Sep; 84(9):686-93. PubMed ID: 8525670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Doppler sonographic determination of the degree of severity of mitral valve stenoses].
    Niehues B; Schwarzenbart E; Neufeind A; Hilger HH
    Z Kardiol; 1985 Jan; 74(1):23-31. PubMed ID: 3976260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Doppler echocardiography determination of the pressure gradient and valve orifice area in mitral valve stenosis].
    Kraus F; Dennig K; Bosiljanoff P; Rudolph W
    Herz; 1986 Dec; 11(6):323-6. PubMed ID: 3817723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Noninvasive assessment of valve lesions with Doppler ultrasound.
    Hatle L
    Herz; 1984 Aug; 9(4):213-21. PubMed ID: 6479831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Doppler-echocardiographic determination of the degree of severity of mitral stenosis].
    Dennig K; Rudolph W
    Herz; 1984 Aug; 9(4):222-30. PubMed ID: 6479832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Doppler echocardiography determination of the orifice area in aortic valve stenosis using a continuity equation].
    Dennig K; Kraus F; Rudolph W
    Herz; 1986 Dec; 11(6):309-17. PubMed ID: 3817722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Noninvasive determination of the orifice area of aortic valve prostheses using Doppler echocardiography].
    Dennig K; Rudolph W
    Herz; 1986 Dec; 11(6):341-5. PubMed ID: 3817727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In vitro verification of Doppler prediction of transvalve pressure gradient and orifice area in stenosis.
    Requarth JA; Goldberg SJ; Vasko SD; Allen HD
    Am J Cardiol; 1984 May; 53(9):1369-73. PubMed ID: 6711439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Physiological basis of flow dependence of Gorlin formula valve area in aortic stenosis: analysis using an hydraulic model of pulsatile flow.
    Rifkin RD
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 Nov; 9(6):740-51. PubMed ID: 11128779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Non-invasive estimation of transmitral pressure gradient and mitral valve area in mitral stenosis by an ultrasonic pulsed Doppler technique].
    Asao M; Kitabatake A; Inoue M; Tanouchi J; Morita T; Masuyama T; Mishima M; Shimazu T; Ishihara K; Fujii K
    J Cardiogr; 1984 Jun; 14(1):149-61. PubMed ID: 6240509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prediction of pressure recovery location in aortic valve stenosis: an in-vitro validation study.
    Rhodes KD; Stroml JA; Rahman MM; VanAuker MD
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2007 Sep; 16(5):489-94. PubMed ID: 17944120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analytical modeling of the instantaneous pressure gradient across the aortic valve.
    Garcia D; Pibarot P; Durand LG
    J Biomech; 2005 Jun; 38(6):1303-11. PubMed ID: 15863115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Design and adjustment of a hydrodynamic model of turbulent flow separation area for in vitro experiment on the downstream of tubal stenosis].
    Guo Y; Shi Y; Xue W; Lin K; Liu S; Zhang J; Meng W
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2005 Feb; 22(1):38-42. PubMed ID: 15762111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Systemic pressure does not directly affect pressure gradient and valve area estimates in aortic stenosis in vitro.
    Mascherbauer J; Fuchs C; Stoiber M; Schima H; Pernicka E; Maurer G; Baumgartner H
    Eur Heart J; 2008 Aug; 29(16):2049-57. PubMed ID: 18502739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hemodynamics of high-performance bileaflet valves: comparison to simulated clinical Doppler measurements.
    Dohmen G; Schmitz C; Schmitz-Rode T; Steinseifer U; Autschbach R
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2006 Jul; 15(4):549-56. PubMed ID: 16901053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Doppler ultrasound determination of pressure decrease in model peripheral arterial stenoses].
    Strauss AL; Scheffler A; Rieger H
    Vasa; 1990; 19(3):207-11. PubMed ID: 2238814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Continuous wave Doppler echocardiographic assessment of aortic stenosis and aortic regurgitation].
    Tei C; Kisanuki A; Arikawa K; Otsuji Y; Arima S; Kashima T; Tanaka H; Kushitani M; Shah PM
    J Cardiogr; 1985 Mar; 15(1):111-21. PubMed ID: 4067338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.