These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37814774)
1. Static and Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Female Pelvic Floor Dysfunction: Correlation With Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification. Jha P; Sarawagi R; Malik R; Kumar A; Pushpalatha K Cureus; 2023 Sep; 15(9):e44915. PubMed ID: 37814774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pelvic floor imaging with MR defecography: correlation with gynecologic pelvic organ prolapse quantification. Swamy N; Bajaj G; Olliphant SS; Henry JA; Jambhekar K; Pandey T; Ram R Abdom Radiol (NY); 2021 Apr; 46(4):1381-1389. PubMed ID: 32211947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of magnetic resonance defecography grading with POP-Q staging and Baden-Walker grading in the evaluation of female pelvic organ prolapse. Pollock GR; Twiss CO; Chartier S; Vedantham S; Funk J; Arif Tiwari H Abdom Radiol (NY); 2021 Apr; 46(4):1373-1380. PubMed ID: 31720767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging to quantify pelvic organ prolapse: reliability of assessment and correlation with clinical findings and pelvic floor symptoms. Lakeman MM; Zijta FM; Peringa J; Nederveen AJ; Stoker J; Roovers JP Int Urogynecol J; 2012 Nov; 23(11):1547-54. PubMed ID: 22531955 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Clinical study on pubococcygeal line determined by dynamic magnetic resonance imaging used in evaluating pelvic organ prolapse]. Miao YL; Zhang XH; Wu J; Kang Y; Hong N; Wang JL Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2010 Dec; 45(12):900-3. PubMed ID: 21211420 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging before and 6 months after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. van der Weiden RM; Rociu E; Mannaerts GH; van Hooff MH; Vierhout ME; Withagen MI Int Urogynecol J; 2014 Apr; 25(4):507-15. PubMed ID: 24146073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of assessing Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification points using dynamic 2D transperineal ultrasound in women with pelvic organ prolapse. Lone FW; Thakar R; Sultan AH; Stankiewicz A Int Urogynecol J; 2012 Nov; 23(11):1555-60. PubMed ID: 22543548 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prevalence of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging-identified pelvic organ prolapse in pre- and postmenopausal women without clinically evident pelvic organ descent. Cimsit C; Yoldemir T; Akpinar IN Acta Radiol; 2016 Nov; 57(11):1418-1424. PubMed ID: 26041768 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Defecatory dysfunction and fecal incontinence in women with or without posterior vaginal wall prolapse as measured by pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q). Augusto KL; Bezerra LRPS; Murad-Regadas SM; Vasconcelos Neto JA; Vasconcelos CTM; Karbage SAL; Bilhar APM; Regadas FSP Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2017 Jul; 214():50-55. PubMed ID: 28477524 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of magnetic resonance defecography with pelvic floor ultrasound and vaginal inspection in the urogynecological diagnosis of pelvic floor dysfunction. Barakat B; Afzal A; Schweda D; Laali A Urol Ann; 2020; 12(2):150-155. PubMed ID: 32565653 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Utilize the simplified POP-Q system in the clinical practice of staging for pelvic organ prolapse: comparative analysis with standard POP-Q system]. Zhang H; Zhu L; Xu T; Lang JH Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Jul; 51(7):510-4. PubMed ID: 27465870 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of episiotomy on pelvic organ prolapse assessed by pelvic organ prolapse quantification system. Aytan H; Tok EC; Ertunc D; Yasa O Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Feb; 173():34-7. PubMed ID: 24314799 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of transperineal ultrasound with POP-Q for assessing symptoms of prolapse. Volløyhaug I; Rojas RG; Mørkved S; Salvesen KÅ Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Apr; 30(4):595-602. PubMed ID: 30069728 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of preoperative pelvic floor muscle training on pelvic floor muscle contraction and symptomatic and anatomical pelvic organ prolapse after surgery: randomized controlled trial. Nyhus MØ; Mathew S; Salvesen Ø; Salvesen KÅ; Stafne S; Volløyhaug I Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Jul; 56(1):28-36. PubMed ID: 32144829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. POP-Q, dynamic MR imaging, and perineal ultrasonography: do they agree in the quantification of female pelvic organ prolapse? Broekhuis SR; Kluivers KB; Hendriks JC; Fütterer JJ; Barentsz JO; Vierhout ME Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct; 2009 May; 20(5):541-9. PubMed ID: 19221680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Relationship between the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification system (POP-Q), the Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7), and the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20) before and after anterior vaginal wall prolapse surgery. Teleman P; Laurikainen E; Kinne I; Pogosean R; Jakobsson U; Rudnicki M Int Urogynecol J; 2015 Feb; 26(2):195-200. PubMed ID: 24866279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Relationship between pelvic floor symptoms and POP-Q measurements. Manonai J; Wattanayingcharoenchai R Neurourol Urodyn; 2016 Aug; 35(6):724-7. PubMed ID: 25919311 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Expression of ArfGAP3 in Vaginal Anterior Wall of Patients With Pelvic Floor Organ Prolapse in Pelvic Organ Prolapse and Non-Pelvic Organ Prolapse Patients. Sun Y; Li B; Lu D; Liu C; Hong S; Hong L Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2021 Jan; 27(1):e64-e69. PubMed ID: 31868832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. How to use the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) system? Madhu C; Swift S; Moloney-Geany S; Drake MJ Neurourol Urodyn; 2018 Aug; 37(S6):S39-S43. PubMed ID: 30614056 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. POP-Q Versus Upright MRI Distance Measurements: A Prospective Study in Patients with POP. van der Steen A; Jochem KY; Consten ECJ; Simonis FFJ; Grob ATM Int Urogynecol J; 2024 Jun; 35(6):1255-1261. PubMed ID: 38743071 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]