These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37814834)

  • 1. [Non-retentive adhesive restorations].
    Hassan Zadeh M; Hassan Zadeh-Barendrecht LW
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2023 Oct; 130(10):403-408. PubMed ID: 37814834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Immediate dentin sealing in indirect restorations of dental fractures in paediatric dentistry.
    Perugia C; Ferraro E; Docimo R
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2013 Jun; 14(2):146-9. PubMed ID: 23758466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Meta-Analysis of the Influence of Bonding Parameters on the Clinical Outcome of Tooth-colored Cervical Restorations.
    Mahn E; Rousson V; Heintze S
    J Adhes Dent; 2015 Aug; 17(5):391-403. PubMed ID: 26525003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dynamic fatigue and fracture resistance of non-retentive all-ceramic full-coverage molar restorations. Influence of ceramic material and preparation design.
    Clausen JO; Abou Tara M; Kern M
    Dent Mater; 2010 Jun; 26(6):533-8. PubMed ID: 20181388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bonded amalgam restorations: a comparative study of glass-ionomer and resin adhesives.
    al-Moayad M; Aboush YE; Elderton RJ
    Br Dent J; 1993 Nov; 175(10):363-7. PubMed ID: 8257646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Adhesive Class VI Resin Composite Restorations of Worn Mandibular Incisal Edges: A Two-year Case Report.
    Brackett MG; Wu J; Bachand WR; Brackett WW
    Oper Dent; 2023 Jan; 48(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 36445956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Tensile bond strength of indirect composites luted with three new self-adhesive resin cements to dentin.
    Türkmen C; Durkan M; Cimilli H; Öksüz M
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2011 Aug; 19(4):363-9. PubMed ID: 21710095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Composite resin restorations: "in vitro" evaluation of three dentin adhesive systems].
    Toca E; Bonfil JJ; Pignoly C
    Inf Dent; 1991 Jun; 73(23):1865-73. PubMed ID: 1830292
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Combining bonded and cemented restorations: a multitechnique case study.
    Shannon A
    Dent Today; 2000 Apr; 19(4):54, 56, 58-61; quiz 61, 151. PubMed ID: 19750729
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Immediate dentin sealing: a fundamental procedure for indirect bonded restorations.
    Magne P
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2005; 17(3):144-54; discussion 155. PubMed ID: 15996383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Survival of Dicor glass-ceramic dental restorations over 16 years. Part III: effect of luting agent and tooth or tooth-substitute core structure.
    Malament KA; Socransky SS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Nov; 86(5):511-9. PubMed ID: 11725279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Posterior indirect adhesive 
restorations: updated indications 
and the Morphology Driven 
Preparation Technique.
    Veneziani M
    Int J Esthet Dent; 2017; 12(2):204-230. PubMed ID: 28653051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fracture resistance of tooth fragment reattachment: effects of different preparation techniques and adhesive materials.
    Pusman E; Cehreli ZC; Altay N; Unver B; Saracbasi O; Ozgun G
    Dent Traumatol; 2010 Feb; 26(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 20089057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of two dentin adhesives in cervical lesions.
    Van Meerbeek B; Braem M; Lambrechts P; Vanherle G
    J Prosthet Dent; 1993 Oct; 70(4):308-14. PubMed ID: 8229880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A 12-year clinical evaluation of a three-step dentin adhesive in noncarious cervical lesions.
    Wilder AD; Swift EJ; Heymann HO; Ritter AV; Sturdevant JR; Bayne SC
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2009 May; 140(5):526-35. PubMed ID: 19411519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The role of adhesive materials and oral biofilm in the failure of adhesive resin restorations.
    Pinna R; Usai P; Filigheddu E; Garcia-Godoy F; Milia E
    Am J Dent; 2017 Oct; 30(5):285-292. PubMed ID: 29178733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Posterior resin composite restorations with or without resin-modified, glass-ionomer cement lining: a 1-year randomized, clinical trial.
    Banomyong D; Harnirattisai C; Burrow MF
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2011 Feb; 2(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 25427330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Simulated fatigue resistance of composite resin versus porcelain CAD/CAM overlay restorations on endodontically treated molars.
    Magne P; Knezevic A
    Quintessence Int; 2009 Feb; 40(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 19169444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of insertion technique and adhesive system on microleakage of Class V resin composite restorations.
    Owens BM; Johnson WW
    J Adhes Dent; 2005; 7(4):303-8. PubMed ID: 16430011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Extended indications for directly bonded composite restorations: a clinician's view.
    Roeters JJ
    J Adhes Dent; 2001; 3(1):81-7. PubMed ID: 11317388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.