These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37814971)
1. Clinical accuracy of partially guided implant placement in edentulous patients: A computed tomography-based retrospective study. Wang B; Yang J; Siow L; Wang Y; Zhang X; Zhou Y; Yu M; Wang H Clin Oral Implants Res; 2024 Jan; 35(1):31-39. PubMed ID: 37814971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical accuracy of flapless computer-guided surgery for implant placement in edentulous arches. Vieira DM; Sotto-Maior BS; Barros CA; Reis ES; Francischone CE Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(5):1347-51. PubMed ID: 24066327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A clinically relevant accuracy study of computer-planned implant placement in the edentulous maxilla using mucosa-supported surgical templates. Verhamme LM; Meijer GJ; Boumans T; de Haan AF; Bergé SJ; Maal TJ Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Apr; 17(2):343-52. PubMed ID: 23879524 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Factors influencing transfer accuracy of cone beam CT-derived template-based implant placement. Behneke A; Burwinkel M; Behneke N Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Apr; 23(4):416-23. PubMed ID: 22092586 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of the Yakebot dental implant robotic system versus fully guided static computer-assisted implant surgery template in edentulous jaw implantation: A preliminary clinical study. Wang W; Xu H; Mei D; Zhou C; Li X; Han Z; Zhou X; Li X; Zhao B Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2024 Apr; 26(2):309-316. PubMed ID: 37728030 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of haptic robotic guidance of dental implant surgery for completely edentulous arches. Bolding SL; Reebye UN J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Oct; 128(4):639-647. PubMed ID: 33678441 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Factors Influencing the Accuracy of Guided Surgery: An In Vitro Trial. Quispe-López N; Flores-Fraile J; Pardal-Peláez B; Delgado-Martínez J; Montero J Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2023; 38(1):120-129. PubMed ID: 37099581 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy of computer-aided oral implant surgery: a clinical and radiographic study. Valente F; Schiroli G; Sbrenna A Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(2):234-42. PubMed ID: 19492638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of the accuracy of implant placement by using fully guided versus partially guided tissue-supported surgical guides with cylindrical versus C-shaped guiding holes: A split-mouth clinical study. Sarhan MM; Khamis MM; El-Sharkawy AM J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Apr; 125(4):620-627. PubMed ID: 32389377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of a dynamic navigation device on the accuracy of implant placement in the completely edentulous mandible: An in vitro study. Feng Y; Yao Y; Yang X J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Nov; 130(5):731-737. PubMed ID: 35000696 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of a Dynamic Dental Implant Navigation System in a Private Practice. Stefanelli LV; DeGroot BS; Lipton DI; Mandelaris GA Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(1):205–213. PubMed ID: 30521660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of dental implant placement with a robotic system in partially edentulous patients: A prospective, single-arm clinical trial. Chen W; Al-Taezi KA; Chu CH; Shen Y; Wu J; Cai K; Chen P; Tang C Clin Oral Implants Res; 2023 Jul; 34(7):707-718. PubMed ID: 37167364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of autonomous robotic surgery for dental implant placement in fully edentulous patients: A retrospective case series study. Li P; Chen J; Li A; Luo K; Xu S; Yang S Clin Oral Implants Res; 2023 Dec; 34(12):1428-1437. PubMed ID: 37855331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The accuracy of dynamic computer assisted implant surgery in fully edentulous jaws: A retrospective case series. Wang J; Ge Y; Mühlemann S; Pan S; Jung RE Clin Oral Implants Res; 2023 Nov; 34(11):1278-1288. PubMed ID: 37642206 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of implant surgical guides fabricated using computer numerical control milling for edentulous jaws: a pilot clinical trial. Chai J; Liu X; Schweyen R; Setz J; Pan S; Liu J; Zhou Y BMC Oral Health; 2020 Oct; 20(1):288. PubMed ID: 33087073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Impact of Surgical Guide Fixation and Implant Location on Accuracy of Static Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery. Pessoa R; Siqueira R; Li J; Saleh I; Meneghetti P; Bezerra F; Wang HL; Mendonça G J Prosthodont; 2022 Feb; 31(2):155-164. PubMed ID: 33904640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of dental implant placement with 3D-printed surgical templates by using Implant Studio and MGUIDE. An observational study. Fotopoulos I; Lillis T; Panagiotidou E; Kapagiannidis I; Nazaroglou I; Dabarakis N Int J Comput Dent; 2022 Sep; 25(3):249-256. PubMed ID: 35072419 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of positioning of implants inserted using a mucosa-supported stereolithographic surgical guide in the edentulous maxilla and mandible. Cassetta M; Giansanti M; Di Mambro A; Stefanelli LV Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(5):1071-8. PubMed ID: 25216132 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An Accuracy Study of Computer-Planned Implant Placement in the Augmented Maxilla Using Mucosa-Supported Surgical Templates. Verhamme LM; Meijer GJ; Bergé SJ; Soehardi RA; Xi T; de Haan AF; Schutyser F; Maal TJ Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Dec; 17(6):1154-63. PubMed ID: 25181255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of operator experience on the accuracy of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical templates: an in vitro study. Cushen SE; Turkyilmaz I J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):248-54. PubMed ID: 23566606 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]