168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37814971)
1. Clinical accuracy of partially guided implant placement in edentulous patients: A computed tomography-based retrospective study.
Wang B; Yang J; Siow L; Wang Y; Zhang X; Zhou Y; Yu M; Wang H
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2024 Jan; 35(1):31-39. PubMed ID: 37814971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical accuracy of flapless computer-guided surgery for implant placement in edentulous arches.
Vieira DM; Sotto-Maior BS; Barros CA; Reis ES; Francischone CE
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(5):1347-51. PubMed ID: 24066327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A clinically relevant accuracy study of computer-planned implant placement in the edentulous maxilla using mucosa-supported surgical templates.
Verhamme LM; Meijer GJ; Boumans T; de Haan AF; Bergé SJ; Maal TJ
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Apr; 17(2):343-52. PubMed ID: 23879524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Factors influencing transfer accuracy of cone beam CT-derived template-based implant placement.
Behneke A; Burwinkel M; Behneke N
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Apr; 23(4):416-23. PubMed ID: 22092586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of the Yakebot dental implant robotic system versus fully guided static computer-assisted implant surgery template in edentulous jaw implantation: A preliminary clinical study.
Wang W; Xu H; Mei D; Zhou C; Li X; Han Z; Zhou X; Li X; Zhao B
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2024 Apr; 26(2):309-316. PubMed ID: 37728030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of haptic robotic guidance of dental implant surgery for completely edentulous arches.
Bolding SL; Reebye UN
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Oct; 128(4):639-647. PubMed ID: 33678441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Factors Influencing the Accuracy of Guided Surgery: An In Vitro Trial.
Quispe-López N; Flores-Fraile J; Pardal-Peláez B; Delgado-Martínez J; Montero J
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2023; 38(1):120-129. PubMed ID: 37099581
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy of computer-aided oral implant surgery: a clinical and radiographic study.
Valente F; Schiroli G; Sbrenna A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(2):234-42. PubMed ID: 19492638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of the accuracy of implant placement by using fully guided versus partially guided tissue-supported surgical guides with cylindrical versus C-shaped guiding holes: A split-mouth clinical study.
Sarhan MM; Khamis MM; El-Sharkawy AM
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Apr; 125(4):620-627. PubMed ID: 32389377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of a dynamic navigation device on the accuracy of implant placement in the completely edentulous mandible: An in vitro study.
Feng Y; Yao Y; Yang X
J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Nov; 130(5):731-737. PubMed ID: 35000696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of a Dynamic Dental Implant Navigation System in a Private Practice.
Stefanelli LV; DeGroot BS; Lipton DI; Mandelaris GA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(1):205–213. PubMed ID: 30521660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of dental implant placement with a robotic system in partially edentulous patients: A prospective, single-arm clinical trial.
Chen W; Al-Taezi KA; Chu CH; Shen Y; Wu J; Cai K; Chen P; Tang C
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2023 Jul; 34(7):707-718. PubMed ID: 37167364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of autonomous robotic surgery for dental implant placement in fully edentulous patients: A retrospective case series study.
Li P; Chen J; Li A; Luo K; Xu S; Yang S
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2023 Dec; 34(12):1428-1437. PubMed ID: 37855331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The accuracy of dynamic computer assisted implant surgery in fully edentulous jaws: A retrospective case series.
Wang J; Ge Y; Mühlemann S; Pan S; Jung RE
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2023 Nov; 34(11):1278-1288. PubMed ID: 37642206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of implant surgical guides fabricated using computer numerical control milling for edentulous jaws: a pilot clinical trial.
Chai J; Liu X; Schweyen R; Setz J; Pan S; Liu J; Zhou Y
BMC Oral Health; 2020 Oct; 20(1):288. PubMed ID: 33087073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Impact of Surgical Guide Fixation and Implant Location on Accuracy of Static Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery.
Pessoa R; Siqueira R; Li J; Saleh I; Meneghetti P; Bezerra F; Wang HL; Mendonça G
J Prosthodont; 2022 Feb; 31(2):155-164. PubMed ID: 33904640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of dental implant placement with 3D-printed surgical templates by using Implant Studio and MGUIDE. An observational study.
Fotopoulos I; Lillis T; Panagiotidou E; Kapagiannidis I; Nazaroglou I; Dabarakis N
Int J Comput Dent; 2022 Sep; 25(3):249-256. PubMed ID: 35072419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of positioning of implants inserted using a mucosa-supported stereolithographic surgical guide in the edentulous maxilla and mandible.
Cassetta M; Giansanti M; Di Mambro A; Stefanelli LV
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(5):1071-8. PubMed ID: 25216132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An Accuracy Study of Computer-Planned Implant Placement in the Augmented Maxilla Using Mucosa-Supported Surgical Templates.
Verhamme LM; Meijer GJ; Bergé SJ; Soehardi RA; Xi T; de Haan AF; Schutyser F; Maal TJ
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Dec; 17(6):1154-63. PubMed ID: 25181255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of operator experience on the accuracy of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical templates: an in vitro study.
Cushen SE; Turkyilmaz I
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):248-54. PubMed ID: 23566606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
