217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37816663)
41. Response to ovarian stimulation is not impacted by a breast cancer diagnosis.
Quinn MM; Cakmak H; Letourneau JM; Cedars MI; Rosen MP
Hum Reprod; 2017 Mar; 32(3):568-574. PubMed ID: 28122888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Knowledge and attitude of reproductive-aged women towards planned oocyte cryopreservation in the United Arab Emirates.
Sayegh L; Coussa A; Kadhom M; Neinavaei N; Hasan H
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2023 Mar; 40(3):609-616. PubMed ID: 36642756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Public support in the United States for elective oocyte cryopreservation.
Lewis EI; Missmer SA; Farland LV; Ginsburg ES
Fertil Steril; 2016 Oct; 106(5):1183-1189. PubMed ID: 27473351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Long-term follow-up to assess criteria for ovarian tissue cryopreservation for fertility preservation in young women and girls with cancer.
Duffin K; Howie R; Kelsey TW; Wallace HB; Anderson RA
Hum Reprod; 2023 Jun; 38(6):1076-1085. PubMed ID: 37011633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. A survey on the awareness and knowledge about elective oocyte cryopreservation among unmarried women of reproductive age visiting a private fertility center.
Hong YH; Park JW; Kim H; Kim SK; Choo CW; Jee BC; Suh CS; Kim SH
Obstet Gynecol Sci; 2019 Nov; 62(6):438-444. PubMed ID: 31777740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Cumulative live birth rates following miscarriage in an initial complete cycle of IVF: a retrospective cohort study of 112 549 women.
Cameron NJ; Bhattacharya S; Bhattacharya S; McLernon DJ
Hum Reprod; 2017 Nov; 32(11):2287-2297. PubMed ID: 29040570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Live birth and perinatal outcomes using cryopreserved oocytes: an analysis of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority database from 2000 to 2016 using three clinical models.
Mascarenhas M; Mehlawat H; Kirubakaran R; Bhandari H; Choudhary M
Hum Reprod; 2021 Apr; 36(5):1416-1426. PubMed ID: 33313698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Elective oocyte cryopreservation for age-related fertility decline.
Chronopoulou E; Raperport C; Sfakianakis A; Srivastava G; Homburg R
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2021 May; 38(5):1177-1186. PubMed ID: 33608838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Social oocyte cryopreservation: a portrayal of Brazilian women.
Santo EVE; Dieamant F; Petersen CG; Mauri AL; Vagnini LD; Renzi A; Zamara C; Oliveira JBA; Baruffi RLR; Franco JG
JBRA Assist Reprod; 2017 Jun; 21(2):101-104. PubMed ID: 28609276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Awareness, intentions and attitudes towards planned oocyte cryopreservation among female medical staff.
Kim SM; Choi JY; Rhee MR; Hong SH; Ji IW; Jeong EH; Lee JR
Reprod Biomed Online; 2022 Jun; 44(6):1169-1176. PubMed ID: 35232673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Awareness and attitude toward oocyte cryopreservation for non-medical reasons: a study on women candidates for social egg freezing.
Hafezi M; Zameni N; Nemati Aghamaleki SZ; Omani-Samani R; Vesali S
J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol; 2022 Dec; 43(4):532-540. PubMed ID: 35998044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. What threshold values of antral follicle count and serum AMH levels should be considered for oocyte cryopreservation after in vitro maturation?
Sonigo C; Simon C; Boubaya M; Benoit A; Sifer C; Sermondade N; Grynberg M
Hum Reprod; 2016 Jul; 31(7):1493-500. PubMed ID: 27165625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Transgender men's experiences of fertility preservation: a qualitative study.
Armuand G; Dhejne C; Olofsson JI; Rodriguez-Wallberg KA
Hum Reprod; 2017 Feb; 32(2):383-390. PubMed ID: 27999119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Enhancing the scope of in vitro maturation for fertility preservation: transvaginal retrieval of immature oocytes during endoscopic gynaecological procedures.
Song XL; Lu CL; Zheng XY; Nisenblat V; Zhen XM; Yang R; Li M; Li R; Yuan YF; Ma CH; Liu P; Feng HL; Yan J; Qiao J
Hum Reprod; 2020 Apr; 35(4):837-846. PubMed ID: 32154563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Similar in vitro maturation rates of oocytes retrieved during the follicular or luteal phase offer flexible options for urgent fertility preservation in breast cancer patients.
Grynberg M; Poulain M; le Parco S; Sifer C; Fanchin R; Frydman N
Hum Reprod; 2016 Mar; 31(3):623-9. PubMed ID: 26759139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Intentions and attitudes towards parenthood and fertility awareness among Chinese university students in Hong Kong: a comparison with Western samples.
Chan CH; Chan TH; Peterson BD; Lampic C; Tam MY
Hum Reprod; 2015 Feb; 30(2):364-72. PubMed ID: 25480921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Sperm cryopreservation does not affect live birth rate in normozoospermic men: analysis of 7969 oocyte donation cycles.
Torra-Massana M; Vassena R; Rodríguez A
Hum Reprod; 2023 Mar; 38(3):400-407. PubMed ID: 36661036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Reproductive choices and outcomes after freezing oocytes for medical reasons: a follow-up study.
Dahhan T; Dancet EA; Miedema DV; van der Veen F; Goddijn M
Hum Reprod; 2014 Sep; 29(9):1925-30. PubMed ID: 24951490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Acceptance and willingness-to-pay for oocyte cryopreservation in medical versus age-related fertility preservation scenarios among Swedish female university students.
Gambadauro P; Bränn E; Hadlaczky G
Sci Rep; 2023 Apr; 13(1):5325. PubMed ID: 37005458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
