These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37816913)

  • 1. Emphasizing responder speed or accuracy modulates but does not abolish the distractor-induced quitting effect in visual search.
    Lawrence RK; Cochrane BA; Eidels A; Howard Z; Lui L; Pratt J
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2023 Oct; 8(1):63. PubMed ID: 37816913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Delayed onsets are not necessary for generating distractor quitting thresholds effects in visual search.
    Lawrence RK; Paas KHW; Cochrane BA; Pratt J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Aug; 85(6):1811-1818. PubMed ID: 37415060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Salience matters: Distractors may, or may not, speed target-absent searches.
    Lawrence RK; Pratt J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Jan; 84(1):89-100. PubMed ID: 34907511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of prevalence on distractor speeded search termination.
    Lui L; Pratt J; Lawrence RK
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2024 Feb; 31(1):303-311. PubMed ID: 37580452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reduced low-prevalence visual search detriment with increasing age: Implications for cognitive theories of aging and real-world search tasks.
    Goodhew SC; Edwards M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2024 Aug; 31(4):1789-1797. PubMed ID: 38289580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The presence of a distractor matching the content of working memory induces delayed quitting in visual search.
    Wu Y; Pan Y
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Apr; 84(3):760-770. PubMed ID: 35359229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quitting thresholds in visual search are impacted by target present detection times but not their variability.
    Becker MW; Rodriguez A; Pontious D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Nov; 84(8):2461-2471. PubMed ID: 36258142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. History Modulates Early Sensory Processing of Salient Distractors.
    Adam KCS; Serences JT
    J Neurosci; 2021 Sep; 41(38):8007-8022. PubMed ID: 34330776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cue relevance drives early quitting in visual search.
    Moher J; Delos Reyes A; Drew T
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2024 Aug; 9(1):54. PubMed ID: 39183257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A search order lost effect: ignoring a singleton distractor affects visual search efficiency.
    Kumada T
    Vision Res; 2010 Jun; 50(14):1402-13. PubMed ID: 20025896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Eye movements and the label feedback effect: Speaking modulates visual search via template integrity.
    Hebert KP; Goldinger SD; Walenchok SC
    Cognition; 2021 May; 210():104587. PubMed ID: 33508577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The surprising robustness of visual search against concurrent auditory distraction.
    Mandal A; Liesefeld AM; Liesefeld HR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2024 Jan; 50(1):99-118. PubMed ID: 38236258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Probing the Neural Mechanisms for Distractor Filtering and Their History-Contingent Modulation by Means of TMS.
    Lega C; Ferrante O; Marini F; Santandrea E; Cattaneo L; Chelazzi L
    J Neurosci; 2019 Sep; 39(38):7591-7603. PubMed ID: 31387915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Distractor context manipulation in visual search: How expectations modulate proactive control.
    Petilli MA; Marini F; Daini R
    Cognition; 2020 Mar; 196():104129. PubMed ID: 31765925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Polarity-dependent Effects of Biparietal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on the Interplay between Target Location and Distractor Saliency in Visual Attention.
    Chechlacz M; Hansen PC; Geng JJ; Cazzoli D
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2018 Jun; 30(6):851-866. PubMed ID: 29393718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Visual search asymmetry depends on target-distractor feature similarity: Is the asymmetry simply a result of distractor rejection speed?
    Zhang YR; Onyper S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jan; 82(1):80-97. PubMed ID: 31359376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Tracking target and distractor processing in fixed-feature visual search: evidence from human electrophysiology.
    Jannati A; Gaspar JM; McDonald JJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Dec; 39(6):1713-30. PubMed ID: 23527999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Inhibition continues to guide search under concurrent visual working memory load.
    Hamblin-Frohman Z; Becker SI
    J Vis; 2022 Feb; 22(2):8. PubMed ID: 35156992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Salient collinear grouping diminishes local salience in visual search: an eye movement study.
    Jingling L; Tang DL; Tseng CH
    J Vis; 2013 Oct; 13(12):. PubMed ID: 24113088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Proactive distractor suppression elicited by statistical regularities in visual search.
    Huang C; Vilotijević A; Theeuwes J; Donk M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2021 Jun; 28(3):918-927. PubMed ID: 33620698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.