These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37817410)

  • 1. Mendelian randomization with incomplete measurements on the exposure in the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos.
    Li Y; Wong KY; Howard AG; Gordon-Larsen P; Highland HM; Graff M; North KE; Downie CG; Avery CL; Yu B; Young KL; Buchanan VL; Kaplan R; Hou L; Joyce BT; Qi Q; Sofer T; Moon JY; Lin DY
    HGG Adv; 2024 Jan; 5(1):100245. PubMed ID: 37817410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multivariable Mendelian randomization with incomplete measurements on the exposure variables in the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos.
    Li Y; Wong KY; Howard AG; Gordon-Larsen P; Highland HM; Graff M; North KE; Downie CG; Avery CL; Yu B; Young KL; Buchanan VL; Kaplan R; Hou L; Joyce BT; Qi Q; Sofer T; Moon JY; Lin DY
    HGG Adv; 2024 Oct; 5(4):100338. PubMed ID: 39095990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. MR-BOIL: Causal inference in one-sample Mendelian randomization for binary outcome with integrated likelihood method.
    Shi D; Wang Y; Zhang Z; Cao Y; Hu YQ
    Genet Epidemiol; 2023 Jun; 47(4):332-357. PubMed ID: 36808763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Testing concordance of instrumental variable effects in generalized linear models with application to Mendelian randomization.
    Dai JY; Chan KC; Hsu L
    Stat Med; 2014 Oct; 33(23):3986-4007. PubMed ID: 24863158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A review of instrumental variable estimators for Mendelian randomization.
    Burgess S; Small DS; Thompson SG
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Oct; 26(5):2333-2355. PubMed ID: 26282889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Network Mendelian randomization: using genetic variants as instrumental variables to investigate mediation in causal pathways.
    Burgess S; Daniel RM; Butterworth AS; Thompson SG;
    Int J Epidemiol; 2015 Apr; 44(2):484-95. PubMed ID: 25150977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mendelian randomization mixed-scale treatment effect robust identification and estimation for causal inference.
    Liu Z; Ye T; Sun B; Schooling M; Tchetgen ET
    Biometrics; 2023 Sep; 79(3):2208-2219. PubMed ID: 35950778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mendelian randomization in health research: using appropriate genetic variants and avoiding biased estimates.
    Taylor AE; Davies NM; Ware JJ; VanderWeele T; Smith GD; Munafò MR
    Econ Hum Biol; 2014 Mar; 13(100):99-106. PubMed ID: 24388127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mendelian randomization with invalid instruments: effect estimation and bias detection through Egger regression.
    Bowden J; Davey Smith G; Burgess S
    Int J Epidemiol; 2015 Apr; 44(2):512-25. PubMed ID: 26050253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An efficient and robust approach to Mendelian randomization with measured pleiotropic effects in a high-dimensional setting.
    Grant AJ; Burgess S
    Biostatistics; 2022 Apr; 23(2):609-625. PubMed ID: 33155035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Challenges and factors that influencing causal inference and interpretation, based on Mendelian randomization studies].
    Wang YZ; Shen HB
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2020 Aug; 41(8):1231-1236. PubMed ID: 32867428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Using instrumental variables to estimate the attributable fraction.
    Dahlqwist E; Kutalik Z; Sjölander A
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Aug; 29(8):2063-2073. PubMed ID: 31640504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Constrained instruments and their application to Mendelian randomization with pleiotropy.
    Jiang L; Oualkacha K; Didelez V; Ciampi A; Rosa-Neto P; Benedet AL; Mathotaarachchi S; Richards JB; Greenwood CMT;
    Genet Epidemiol; 2019 Jun; 43(4):373-401. PubMed ID: 30635941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Weak and pleiotropy robust sex-stratified Mendelian randomization in the one sample and two sample settings.
    Karageorgiou V; Tyrrell J; Mckinley TJ; Bowden J
    Genet Epidemiol; 2023 Mar; 47(2):135-151. PubMed ID: 36682072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Severity of bias of a simple estimator of the causal odds ratio in Mendelian randomization studies.
    Harbord RM; Didelez V; Palmer TM; Meng S; Sterne JA; Sheehan NA
    Stat Med; 2013 Mar; 32(7):1246-58. PubMed ID: 23080538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. MRCIP: a robust Mendelian randomization method accounting for correlated and idiosyncratic pleiotropy.
    Xu S; Fung WK; Liu Z
    Brief Bioinform; 2021 Sep; 22(5):. PubMed ID: 33704372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Extending the MR-Egger method for multivariable Mendelian randomization to correct for both measured and unmeasured pleiotropy.
    Rees JMB; Wood AM; Burgess S
    Stat Med; 2017 Dec; 36(29):4705-4718. PubMed ID: 28960498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. On the use of kernel machines for Mendelian randomization.
    Zhang W; Ghosh D
    Quant Biol; 2017 Dec; 5(4):368-379. PubMed ID: 30221016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Power and sample size calculations for Mendelian randomization studies using one genetic instrument.
    Freeman G; Cowling BJ; Schooling CM
    Int J Epidemiol; 2013 Aug; 42(4):1157-63. PubMed ID: 23934314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Two robust tools for inference about causal effects with invalid instruments.
    Kang H; Lee Y; Cai TT; Small DS
    Biometrics; 2022 Mar; 78(1):24-34. PubMed ID: 33616910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.