131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37817410)
1. Mendelian randomization with incomplete measurements on the exposure in the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos.
Li Y; Wong KY; Howard AG; Gordon-Larsen P; Highland HM; Graff M; North KE; Downie CG; Avery CL; Yu B; Young KL; Buchanan VL; Kaplan R; Hou L; Joyce BT; Qi Q; Sofer T; Moon JY; Lin DY
HGG Adv; 2024 Jan; 5(1):100245. PubMed ID: 37817410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. MR-BOIL: Causal inference in one-sample Mendelian randomization for binary outcome with integrated likelihood method.
Shi D; Wang Y; Zhang Z; Cao Y; Hu YQ
Genet Epidemiol; 2023 Jun; 47(4):332-357. PubMed ID: 36808763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Testing concordance of instrumental variable effects in generalized linear models with application to Mendelian randomization.
Dai JY; Chan KC; Hsu L
Stat Med; 2014 Oct; 33(23):3986-4007. PubMed ID: 24863158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A review of instrumental variable estimators for Mendelian randomization.
Burgess S; Small DS; Thompson SG
Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Oct; 26(5):2333-2355. PubMed ID: 26282889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Network Mendelian randomization: using genetic variants as instrumental variables to investigate mediation in causal pathways.
Burgess S; Daniel RM; Butterworth AS; Thompson SG;
Int J Epidemiol; 2015 Apr; 44(2):484-95. PubMed ID: 25150977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mendelian randomization mixed-scale treatment effect robust identification and estimation for causal inference.
Liu Z; Ye T; Sun B; Schooling M; Tchetgen ET
Biometrics; 2023 Sep; 79(3):2208-2219. PubMed ID: 35950778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mendelian randomization in health research: using appropriate genetic variants and avoiding biased estimates.
Taylor AE; Davies NM; Ware JJ; VanderWeele T; Smith GD; Munafò MR
Econ Hum Biol; 2014 Mar; 13(100):99-106. PubMed ID: 24388127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mendelian randomization with invalid instruments: effect estimation and bias detection through Egger regression.
Bowden J; Davey Smith G; Burgess S
Int J Epidemiol; 2015 Apr; 44(2):512-25. PubMed ID: 26050253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An efficient and robust approach to Mendelian randomization with measured pleiotropic effects in a high-dimensional setting.
Grant AJ; Burgess S
Biostatistics; 2022 Apr; 23(2):609-625. PubMed ID: 33155035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Challenges and factors that influencing causal inference and interpretation, based on Mendelian randomization studies].
Wang YZ; Shen HB
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2020 Aug; 41(8):1231-1236. PubMed ID: 32867428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Using instrumental variables to estimate the attributable fraction.
Dahlqwist E; Kutalik Z; Sjölander A
Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Aug; 29(8):2063-2073. PubMed ID: 31640504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Weak and pleiotropy robust sex-stratified Mendelian randomization in the one sample and two sample settings.
Karageorgiou V; Tyrrell J; Mckinley TJ; Bowden J
Genet Epidemiol; 2023 Mar; 47(2):135-151. PubMed ID: 36682072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Constrained instruments and their application to Mendelian randomization with pleiotropy.
Jiang L; Oualkacha K; Didelez V; Ciampi A; Rosa-Neto P; Benedet AL; Mathotaarachchi S; Richards JB; Greenwood CMT;
Genet Epidemiol; 2019 Jun; 43(4):373-401. PubMed ID: 30635941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Severity of bias of a simple estimator of the causal odds ratio in Mendelian randomization studies.
Harbord RM; Didelez V; Palmer TM; Meng S; Sterne JA; Sheehan NA
Stat Med; 2013 Mar; 32(7):1246-58. PubMed ID: 23080538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Extending the MR-Egger method for multivariable Mendelian randomization to correct for both measured and unmeasured pleiotropy.
Rees JMB; Wood AM; Burgess S
Stat Med; 2017 Dec; 36(29):4705-4718. PubMed ID: 28960498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. MRCIP: a robust Mendelian randomization method accounting for correlated and idiosyncratic pleiotropy.
Xu S; Fung WK; Liu Z
Brief Bioinform; 2021 Sep; 22(5):. PubMed ID: 33704372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Power and sample size calculations for Mendelian randomization studies using one genetic instrument.
Freeman G; Cowling BJ; Schooling CM
Int J Epidemiol; 2013 Aug; 42(4):1157-63. PubMed ID: 23934314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. On the use of kernel machines for Mendelian randomization.
Zhang W; Ghosh D
Quant Biol; 2017 Dec; 5(4):368-379. PubMed ID: 30221016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mendelian randomization with a binary exposure variable: interpretation and presentation of causal estimates.
Burgess S; Labrecque JA
Eur J Epidemiol; 2018 Oct; 33(10):947-952. PubMed ID: 30039250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Two robust tools for inference about causal effects with invalid instruments.
Kang H; Lee Y; Cai TT; Small DS
Biometrics; 2022 Mar; 78(1):24-34. PubMed ID: 33616910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
