These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37818898)

  • 1. Comparative study of mechanical vs. manual circumcision in the pediatric population: An alternative to the conventional technique?
    Zamora Vidal B; Gómez Cervantes M; Ávila Ramírez LF; Rodríguez de Alarcón García J; Domínguez Amillo E; Guillén Redondo P; Soto Beauregard C
    Cir Pediatr; 2023 Oct; 36(4):165-170. PubMed ID: 37818898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Application of a novel disposable suture device in circumcision: a prospective non-randomized controlled study.
    Zhang Z; Yang B; Yu W; Han Y; Xu Z; Chen H; Chen Y; Dai Y
    Int Urol Nephrol; 2016 Apr; 48(4):465-73. PubMed ID: 26797875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [A novel disposable ring versus the suture device in circumcision].
    Zhao YJ; Zhan PC; Chen Q; Cheng W; Ye FZ; Wang YS; Wang JJ; Tang ZM
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2017 Dec; 23(12):1093-1098. PubMed ID: 29738180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [A novel disposable circumcision device versus conventional surgery in the treatment of redundant prepuce and phimosis].
    Zhao YJ; Zhan PC; Chen Q; Cheng W; Ye FZ; Wang YS; Wang JJ; Li JH; Tang ZM
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2017 Nov; 23(11):1007-1013. PubMed ID: 29738167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Clinical effect of circumcision stapler in the treatment of phimosis and redundant prepuce].
    Huo ZC; Liu G; Wang W; He DG; Yu H; Fan WJ; Zhong Z
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2015 Apr; 21(4):330-3. PubMed ID: 26027100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative analysis on the outcomes in circumcising children using modified Chinese ShangRing and conventional surgical circumcision.
    Zhang Q; Gao L; Liu D; Song G; Gao P; Zhang S; Zhang J; Xu Y; Han D; Xu Y
    Pediatr Surg Int; 2022 Dec; 39(1):59. PubMed ID: 36550318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Clinical effects of the circumcision stapler, foreskin cerclage, and traditional circumcision: A comparative study].
    Miao HD; Lu JW; Lu FN; Shen F; Yuan XL; Liu HY
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2015 Apr; 21(4):334-7. PubMed ID: 26027101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bipolar scissors circumcision is a safe, fast, and bloodless procedure in children.
    Méndez-Gallart R; Estévez E; Bautista A; Rodríguez P; Taboada P; Armas AL; Pradillos JM; Varela R
    J Pediatr Surg; 2009 Oct; 44(10):2048-53. PubMed ID: 19853772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Surgical plane positioning with a disposable circumcision suture device for the treatment of phimosis and redundant prepuce].
    Han YF; Jiang HS; Wang JL; Chong W; Chen H; Xu ZP; Chen Y
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2018 May; 24(5):404-408. PubMed ID: 30171754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Shang Ring scissor circumcision versus electrotome circumcision for redundant prepuce].
    Tang XH; Zhang P; Ding H; Zhao JH; Tang LL; Fang Q
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2016 Oct; 22(10):877-881. PubMed ID: 29278467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Plastic Clamp Versus Conventional Surgical Dissection Technique in Pediatric Circumcision: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Yao X; Zhang G; Xiong Q; Feng S; Liu X
    Curr Urol Rep; 2024 Aug; 25(8):173-180. PubMed ID: 38769228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Comparison of the disposable circumcision stapler, disposable prepuce ligator and traditional surgical method in circumcision].
    Peng L; Han YF; Chen D; Lai B; Huang HC
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2020 Dec; 26(12):1101-1104. PubMed ID: 34898085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Phimosis: dorsal slit or circumcision?].
    Corona C; Cañizo A; Cerda J; Fanjul M; Carrera N; Tardáguila A; Zornoza M; Parente A; Angulo JM; De Tomás E; Molina E; Peláez D; García Casillas MA; Rivas S; Romero R; Marín MC
    Cir Pediatr; 2011 Jan; 24(1):51-4. PubMed ID: 23155652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Modified circumcision with a disposable suture device].
    Ren Y; Yan JJ
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2015 Jun; 21(6):541-4. PubMed ID: 26242046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sutureless circumcision using monopolar diathermy and 2-octyl cyanoacrylate is safe and effective in a cohort of 634 post-neonatal prepubescent boys.
    Lovin JM; Stone KM; Pickett JK; Kirsch AJ
    J Pediatr Urol; 2022 Dec; 18(6):790-795. PubMed ID: 35466011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Shang Ring circumcision by transverse incision in the distal penis foreskin and pull-up of the interior board for short frenulum praeputii].
    Liu C; Liu XJ; Mu JG; Liu D; Ren YS; Zhang CL
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2014 Apr; 20(4):329-33. PubMed ID: 24873159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prospective randomized trial comparing dissection with Plastibell® circumcision.
    Bastos Netto JM; de Araújo JG; de Almeida Noronha MF; Passos BR; de Bessa J; Figueiredo AA
    J Pediatr Urol; 2010 Dec; 6(6):572-7. PubMed ID: 20153700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Shang Ring, sleeve and conventional circumcisions for redundant prepuce and phimosis: A comparative study of 918 cases].
    Wang R; Chen WJ; Shi WH; Xue YF
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2013 Apr; 19(4):332-6. PubMed ID: 23678713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A Comparative Study on the Clinical Efficacy of Two Different Disposable Circumcision Suture Devices in Adult Males.
    Shen J; Shi J; Gao J; Wang N; Tang J; Yu B; Wang W; Wang R
    Urol J; 2017 Aug; 14(5):5013-5017. PubMed ID: 28853107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Shang Ring versus disposable circumcision suture device in the treatment of phimosis or redundant prepuce].
    Wang SX; Zhang ZB; Yang SF; Yang EM; Pan DS; Xie XQ; Lin XH; Yang MY
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2016 Jun; 22(6):534-537. PubMed ID: 28963844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.