BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

312 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37818940)

  • 21. Neural tracking as a diagnostic tool to assess the auditory pathway.
    Gillis M; Van Canneyt J; Francart T; Vanthornhout J
    Hear Res; 2022 Dec; 426():108607. PubMed ID: 36137861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. General Auditory and Speech-Specific Contributions to Cortical Envelope Tracking Revealed Using Auditory Chimeras.
    Prinsloo KD; Lalor EC
    J Neurosci; 2022 Oct; 42(41):7782-7798. PubMed ID: 36041853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A tradeoff between acoustic and linguistic feature encoding in spoken language comprehension.
    Tezcan F; Weissbart H; Martin AE
    Elife; 2023 Jul; 12():. PubMed ID: 37417736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Attention Differentially Affects Acoustic and Phonetic Feature Encoding in a Multispeaker Environment.
    Teoh ES; Ahmed F; Lalor EC
    J Neurosci; 2022 Jan; 42(4):682-691. PubMed ID: 34893546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Data-driven spatial filtering for improved measurement of cortical tracking of multiple representations of speech.
    Lesenfants D; Vanthornhout J; Verschueren E; Francart T
    J Neural Eng; 2019 Oct; 16(6):066017. PubMed ID: 31426053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Intonation Units in Spontaneous Speech Evoke a Neural Response.
    Inbar M; Genzer S; Perry A; Grossman E; Landau AN
    J Neurosci; 2023 Nov; 43(48):8189-8200. PubMed ID: 37793909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A mutual information analysis of neural coding of speech by low-frequency MEG phase information.
    Cogan GB; Poeppel D
    J Neurophysiol; 2011 Aug; 106(2):554-63. PubMed ID: 21562190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Semantic and acoustic analysis of speech by functional networks with distinct time scales.
    Deng S; Srinivasan R
    Brain Res; 2010 Jul; 1346():132-44. PubMed ID: 20580635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Predicting individual speech intelligibility from the cortical tracking of acoustic- and phonetic-level speech representations.
    Lesenfants D; Vanthornhout J; Verschueren E; Decruy L; Francart T
    Hear Res; 2019 Sep; 380():1-9. PubMed ID: 31167150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparing the potential of MEG and EEG to uncover brain tracking of speech temporal envelope.
    Destoky F; Philippe M; Bertels J; Verhasselt M; Coquelet N; Vander Ghinst M; Wens V; De Tiège X; Bourguignon M
    Neuroimage; 2019 Jan; 184():201-213. PubMed ID: 30205208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Two stages of speech envelope tracking in human auditory cortex modulated by speech intelligibility.
    Xu N; Zhao B; Luo L; Zhang K; Shao X; Luan G; Wang Q; Hu W; Wang Q
    Cereb Cortex; 2023 Feb; 33(5):2215-2228. PubMed ID: 35695785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Linguistic Structure and Meaning Organize Neural Oscillations into a Content-Specific Hierarchy.
    Kaufeld G; Bosker HR; Ten Oever S; Alday PM; Meyer AS; Martin AE
    J Neurosci; 2020 Dec; 40(49):9467-9475. PubMed ID: 33097640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The effect of stimulus intensity on neural envelope tracking.
    Verschueren E; Vanthornhout J; Francart T
    Hear Res; 2021 Apr; 403():108175. PubMed ID: 33494033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Noise-robust cortical tracking of attended speech in real-world acoustic scenes.
    Fuglsang SA; Dau T; Hjortkjær J
    Neuroimage; 2017 Aug; 156():435-444. PubMed ID: 28412441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Cortical auditory responses index the contributions of different RMS-level-dependent segments to speech intelligibility.
    Wang L; Li H; Wu EX; Chen F
    Hear Res; 2019 Nov; 383():107808. PubMed ID: 31606583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Perceptually relevant speech tracking in auditory and motor cortex reflects distinct linguistic features.
    Keitel A; Gross J; Kayser C
    PLoS Biol; 2018 Mar; 16(3):e2004473. PubMed ID: 29529019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Neural tracking of speech envelope does not unequivocally reflect intelligibility.
    Kösem A; Dai B; McQueen JM; Hagoort P
    Neuroimage; 2023 May; 272():120040. PubMed ID: 36935084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The effects of speech masking on neural tracking of acoustic and semantic features of natural speech.
    Yasmin S; Irsik VC; Johnsrude IS; Herrmann B
    Neuropsychologia; 2023 Jul; 186():108584. PubMed ID: 37169066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Theta band oscillations reflect more than entrainment: behavioral and neural evidence demonstrates an active chunking process.
    Teng X; Tian X; Doelling K; Poeppel D
    Eur J Neurosci; 2018 Oct; 48(8):2770-2782. PubMed ID: 29044763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Neural dynamics differentially encode phrases and sentences during spoken language comprehension.
    Bai F; Meyer AS; Martin AE
    PLoS Biol; 2022 Jul; 20(7):e3001713. PubMed ID: 35834569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.