These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37819812)

  • 1. Bipartite Ranking Fairness Through a Model Agnostic Ordering Adjustment.
    Cui S; Pan W; Zhang C; Wang F
    IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell; 2023 Nov; 45(11):13235-13249. PubMed ID: 37819812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ensuring generalized fairness in batch classification.
    Pal M; Pokhriyal S; Sikdar S; Ganguly N
    Sci Rep; 2023 Nov; 13(1):18892. PubMed ID: 37919372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An empirical characterization of fair machine learning for clinical risk prediction.
    Pfohl SR; Foryciarz A; Shah NH
    J Biomed Inform; 2021 Jan; 113():103621. PubMed ID: 33220494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How Robust is Your Fairness? Evaluating and Sustaining Fairness under Unseen Distribution Shifts.
    Wang H; Hong J; Zhou J; Wang Z
    Transact Mach Learn Res; 2023; 2023():. PubMed ID: 37056515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Unsupervised ensemble ranking of terms in electronic health record notes based on their importance to patients.
    Chen J; Yu H
    J Biomed Inform; 2017 Apr; 68():121-131. PubMed ID: 28267590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Framework for Ranking Machine Learning Predictions of Limited, Multimodal, and Longitudinal Behavioral Passive Sensing Data: Combining User-Agnostic and Personalized Modeling.
    Mullick T; Shaaban S; Radovic A; Doryab A
    JMIR AI; 2024 May; 3():e47805. PubMed ID: 38875667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Utilizing data sampling techniques on algorithmic fairness for customer churn prediction with data imbalance problems.
    Maw M; Haw SC; Ho CK
    F1000Res; 2021; 10():988. PubMed ID: 36071889
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A joint fairness model with applications to risk predictions for underrepresented populations.
    Do H; Nandi S; Putzel P; Smyth P; Zhong J
    Biometrics; 2023 Jun; 79(2):826-840. PubMed ID: 35142367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improving Fairness in AI Models on Electronic Health Records: The Case for Federated Learning Methods.
    Poulain R; Tarek MFB; Beheshti R
    FAccT 23 (2023); 2023 Jun; 2023():1599-1608. PubMed ID: 37990734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Counterfactual fairness: The case study of a food delivery platform's reputational-ranking algorithm.
    Piccininni M
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():1015100. PubMed ID: 36389466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multi-task learning with dynamic re-weighting to achieve fairness in healthcare predictive modeling.
    Li C; Ding S; Zou N; Hu X; Jiang X; Zhang K
    J Biomed Inform; 2023 Jul; 143():104399. PubMed ID: 37211197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Novel learning framework (knockoff technique) to evaluate metric ranking algorithms to describe human response to injury.
    Banerjee A; DeVogel N; Pintar FA; Yoganandan N
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018; 19(sup2):S121-S126. PubMed ID: 30570337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Joint Fairness Model with Applications to Risk Predictions for Under-represented Populations.
    Do H; Nandi S; Putzel P; Smyth P; Zhong J
    ArXiv; 2021 May; ():. PubMed ID: 34012993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reduction from cost-sensitive ordinal ranking to weighted binary classification.
    Lin HT; Li L
    Neural Comput; 2012 May; 24(5):1329-67. PubMed ID: 22295981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A unified framework for finding differentially expressed genes from microarray experiments.
    Shaik JS; Yeasin M
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2007 Sep; 8():347. PubMed ID: 17877806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fairness in Mobile Phone-Based Mental Health Assessment Algorithms: Exploratory Study.
    Park J; Arunachalam R; Silenzio V; Singh VK
    JMIR Form Res; 2022 Jun; 6(6):e34366. PubMed ID: 35699997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Models and Mechanisms for Spatial Data Fairness.
    Shaham S; Ghinita G; Shahabi C
    Proceedings VLDB Endowment; 2022 Oct; 16(2):167-179. PubMed ID: 37220471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. SLIDE: A surrogate fairness constraint to ensure fairness consistency.
    Kim K; Ohn I; Kim S; Kim Y
    Neural Netw; 2022 Oct; 154():441-454. PubMed ID: 35964434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An Innovative Excited-ACS-IDGWO Algorithm for Optimal Biomedical Data Feature Selection.
    Segera D; Mbuthia M; Nyete A
    Biomed Res Int; 2020; 2020():8506365. PubMed ID: 32908920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fast Manifold Ranking With Local Bipartite Graph.
    Chen X; Ye Y; Wu Q; Nie F
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2021; 30():6744-6756. PubMed ID: 34264827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.