126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37819855)
21. Long-Term Results Comparing Xenogeneic Collagen Matrix and Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafts With Coronally Advanced Flaps for Treatment of Dehiscence-Type Recession Defects.
McGuire MK; Scheyer ET
J Periodontol; 2016 Mar; 87(3):221-7. PubMed ID: 26469812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Title-comparison of coronally advanced flap with chorion membrane vs coronally advanced flap with connective tissue graft in the treatment of multiple gingival recessions: a split-mouth randomised controlled study.
Pradhan S; Shetty N; Kamath D
F1000Res; 2022; 11():533. PubMed ID: 35685192
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Treatment of single maxillary gingival recession associated with non-carious cervical lesion: Randomized clinical trial comparing connective tissue graft alone to graft plus partial restoration.
Santamaria MP; Silveira CA; Mathias IF; Neves FLDS; Dos Santos LM; Jardini MAN; Tatakis DN; Sallum EA; Bresciani E
J Clin Periodontol; 2018 Aug; 45(8):968-976. PubMed ID: 29681059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Treatment of miller type I and II gingival recession defects using three-dimensional porcine collagen matrix with coronally advanced flap: A randomized clinical split-mouth trial (a 1-year follow-up).
Barakat H; Dayoub S
Indian J Dent Res; 2020; 31(2):209-216. PubMed ID: 32436899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Long term assessment of root coverage stability using connective tissue graft with or without an epithelial collar for gingival recession treatment. A 12-year follow-up from a randomized clinical trial.
Barootchi S; Tavelli L; Di Gianfilippo R; Byun HY; Oh TJ; Barbato L; Cairo F; Wang HL
J Clin Periodontol; 2019 Nov; 46(11):1124-1133. PubMed ID: 31446625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Does enamel matrix derivative application provide additional clinical benefits in the treatment of maxillary Miller class I and II gingival recession? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Meza Mauricio J; Furquim CP; Bustillos-Torrez W; Soto-Peñaloza D; Peñarrocha-Oltra D; Retamal-Valdes B; Faveri M
Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Apr; 25(4):1613-1626. PubMed ID: 33474623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparative Evaluation of Coronally Advanced Flap with and without Bioactive Glass Putty in the Management of Gingival Recession Defects: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.
Bansal A; Kulloli A; Kathariya R; Shetty S; Jain H; Raikar S
J Int Acad Periodontol; 2016 Jan; 18(1):7-15. PubMed ID: 26764966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Root coverage of gingival recessions with non-carious cervical lesions: a controlled clinical trial.
Reis MBL; Mandetta CMR; Dantas CDF; Marañón-Vásquez G; Taba M; de Souza SLS; Messora MR; Bulle DBP; Novaes AB
Clin Oral Investig; 2020 Dec; 24(12):4583-4589. PubMed ID: 32440936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Long-term evaluation (20 years) of the outcomes of subepithelial connective tissue graft plus coronally advanced flap in the treatment of maxillary single recession-type defects.
Pini Prato GP; Franceschi D; Cortellini P; Chambrone L
J Periodontol; 2018 Nov; 89(11):1290-1299. PubMed ID: 29873085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Tunnel technique with connective tissue graft versus coronally advanced flap with enamel matrix derivate for root coverage: 2-year results of an RCT using 3D digital measuring for volumetric comparison of gingival dimensions.
Zuhr O; Rebele SF; Vach K; Petsos H; Hürzeler MB;
J Clin Periodontol; 2020 Sep; 47(9):1144-1158. PubMed ID: 32510644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Treatment of multiple adjacent gingival recessions with coronally advanced flap versus modified coronally advanced tunnel with a volumetrically stable collagen matrix: a 12-months randomized controlled clinical trial.
Di Domenico GL; Guglielmi D; Aroca S; de Sanctis M
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2023 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 37471160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Evaluation of human recession defects treated with coronally advanced flaps and either enamel matrix derivative or connective tissue. Part 1: Comparison of clinical parameters.
McGuire MK; Nunn M
J Periodontol; 2003 Aug; 74(8):1110-25. PubMed ID: 14514224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparative efficacy of coronally advanced flap with and without guided tissue regeneration in the management of gingival recession defects: A split-mouth trial.
Potharaju SP; Prathypaty SK; Chintala RK; Kumar DS; Bai YD; Bolla VL; Koppolu P; Barakat A; Lingam AS
Ann Afr Med; 2022; 21(4):415-420. PubMed ID: 36412344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Coronally advanced flap and connective tissue graft with or without plasma rich in growth factors (PRGF) in treatment of gingival recession.
Jenabian N; Motallebnejad M; Zahedi E; Sarmast ND; Angelov N
J Clin Exp Dent; 2018 May; 10(5):e431-e438. PubMed ID: 29849966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Clinical efficacy of coronally advanced flap with or without connective tissue graft for the treatment of multiple adjacent gingival recessions in the aesthetic area: a randomized controlled clinical trial.
Cairo F; Cortellini P; Pilloni A; Nieri M; Cincinelli S; Amunni F; Pagavino G; Tonetti MS
J Clin Periodontol; 2016 Oct; 43(10):849-56. PubMed ID: 27329829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Coronally Advanced Flap with Xenogeneic Collagen Matrix for the Treatment of Gingival Recessions at Sites Presenting with Cervical Restorations or Noncarious Cervical Lesions: A Clinical and Ultrasonographic Study.
Barootchi S; Rodriguez MV; Chan HL; Kripfgans OD; Wang HL; Tavelli L
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2023 Mar, Apr; 43(2):146-154. PubMed ID: 37232677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Periosteal pedicle graft with coronally advanced flap and its comparison with modified coronally advanced flap in the treatment of multiple adjacent gingival recessions-a randomized clinical trial.
Nisha S; Shashikumar P
J Oral Biol Craniofac Res; 2021; 11(2):99-106. PubMed ID: 33532194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Efficacy of periodontal plastic surgery procedures in the treatment of localized facial gingival recessions. A systematic review.
Cairo F; Nieri M; Pagliaro U
J Clin Periodontol; 2014 Apr; 41 Suppl 15():S44-62. PubMed ID: 24641000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Vestibular incisional subperiosteal tunnel access versus coronally advanced flap with connective tissue graft for root coverage of Miller's class I and II gingival recession: A randomized clinical trial.
Mansouri SS; Moghaddas O; Torabi N; Ghafari K
J Adv Periodontol Implant Dent; 2019; 11(1):12-20. PubMed ID: 35919624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Clinical Behavior of the Gingival Margin following Conservative "Coronally Dynamic" Restorations in the Presence of Non-Carious Cervical Lesions Associated with Gingival Recession: A Pilot Study.
Femiano F; Sorice R; Femiano R; Femiano L; Nucci L; Grassia V; Annunziata M; Baldi A; Scotti N; Nastri L
Dent J (Basel); 2022 Jul; 10(7):. PubMed ID: 35877406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
