These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37820407)

  • 1. Animal board invited review: The purebred-crossbred genetic correlation in poultry.
    Calus MPL; Wientjes YCJ; Bos J; Duenk P
    Animal; 2023 Nov; 17(11):100997. PubMed ID: 37820407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Genetic correlation and heritabilities for purebred and crossbred performance in poultry egg production traits.
    Wei M; van der Werf JH
    J Anim Sci; 1995 Aug; 73(8):2220-6. PubMed ID: 8567456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Selective genotyping and phenotypic data inclusion strategies of crossbred progeny for combined crossbred and purebred selection in swine breeding.
    See GM; Mote BE; Spangler ML
    J Anim Sci; 2021 Mar; 99(3):. PubMed ID: 33560334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Genetic parameters and purebred-crossbred genetic correlations for growth, meat quality, and carcass traits in pigs.
    Esfandyari H; Thekkoot D; Kemp R; Plastow G; Dekkers J
    J Anim Sci; 2020 Dec; 98(12):. PubMed ID: 33325519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Estimating the purebred-crossbred genetic correlation for uniformity of eggshell color in laying hens.
    Mulder HA; Visscher J; Fablet J
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 May; 48(1):39. PubMed ID: 27151311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Review: optimizing genomic selection for crossbred performance by model improvement and data collection.
    Duenk P; Bijma P; Wientjes YCJ; Calus MPL
    J Anim Sci; 2021 Aug; 99(8):. PubMed ID: 34223907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Micro-genetic environmental sensitivity across macro-environments of chickens reared in Burkina Faso and France.
    Madsen MD; Duijvesteijn N; van der Werf J; Clark S
    Genet Sel Evol; 2023 Nov; 55(1):85. PubMed ID: 38036958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Optimizing genomic reference populations to improve crossbred performance.
    Wientjes YCJ; Bijma P; Calus MPL
    Genet Sel Evol; 2020 Nov; 52(1):65. PubMed ID: 33158416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. BOARD INVITED REVIEW: The purebred-crossbred correlation in pigs: A review of theory, estimates, and implications.
    Wientjes YCJ; Calus MPL
    J Anim Sci; 2017 Aug; 95(8):3467-3478. PubMed ID: 28805893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pedigree and genomic evaluation of pigs using a terminal-cross model.
    Tusell L; Gilbert H; Riquet J; Mercat MJ; Legarra A; Larzul C
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Apr; 48():32. PubMed ID: 27056443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimating the purebred-crossbred genetic correlation of body weight in broiler chickens with pedigree or genomic relationships.
    Duenk P; Calus MPL; Wientjes YCJ; Breen VP; Henshall JM; Hawken R; Bijma P
    Genet Sel Evol; 2019 Feb; 51(1):6. PubMed ID: 30782121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact of inclusion rates of crossbred phenotypes and genotypes in nucleus selection programs.
    See GM; Mote BE; Spangler ML
    J Anim Sci; 2020 Dec; 98(12):. PubMed ID: 33180915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Purebred and Crossbred Genomic Evaluation and Mate Allocation Strategies To Exploit Dominance in Pig Crossbreeding Schemes.
    González-Diéguez D; Tusell L; Bouquet A; Legarra A; Vitezica ZG
    G3 (Bethesda); 2020 Aug; 10(8):2829-2841. PubMed ID: 32554752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Additive and Dominance Genomic Analysis for Litter Size in Purebred and Crossbred Iberian Pigs.
    Srihi H; Noguera JL; Topayan V; Martín de Hijas M; Ibañez-Escriche N; Casellas J; Vázquez-Gómez M; Martínez-Castillero M; Rosas JP; Varona L
    Genes (Basel); 2021 Dec; 13(1):. PubMed ID: 35052355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Model definition for genetic evaluation of purebred and crossbred lambs including heterosis.
    Vargas Jurado N; Notter DR; Taylor JB; Brown DJ; Mousel MR; Lewis RM
    J Anim Sci; 2022 Jun; 100(6):. PubMed ID: 35696612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A bivariate genomic model with additive, dominance and inbreeding depression effects for sire line and three-way crossbred pigs.
    Christensen OF; Nielsen B; Su G; Xiang T; Madsen P; Ostersen T; Velander I; Strathe AB
    Genet Sel Evol; 2019 Aug; 51(1):45. PubMed ID: 31426753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Gene differential expression of liver tissues in crossbred versus purebred chicken and their relationship with heterosis of meat trait].
    Wang D; Zhang Y; Sun DX; Yu Y; Xu GY; Li JY
    Yi Chuan Xue Bao; 2004 Mar; 31(3):257-64. PubMed ID: 15195564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy of Predicted Genomic Breeding Values in Purebred and Crossbred Pigs.
    Hidalgo AM; Bastiaansen JW; Lopes MS; Harlizius B; Groenen MA; de Koning DJ
    G3 (Bethesda); 2015 May; 5(8):1575-83. PubMed ID: 26019187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Maximizing crossbred performance through purebred genomic selection.
    Esfandyari H; Sørensen AC; Bijma P
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Mar; 47(1):16. PubMed ID: 25887297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Genomic Evaluation for a Crossbreeding System Implementing Breed-of-Origin for Targeted Markers.
    Sevillano CA; Bovenhuis H; Calus MPL
    Front Genet; 2019; 10():418. PubMed ID: 31130991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.