These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37820407)

  • 41. Genomic prediction in pigs using data from a commercial crossbred population: insights from the Duroc x (Landrace x Yorkshire) three-way crossbreeding system.
    Liu S; Yao T; Chen D; Xiao S; Chen L; Zhang Z
    Genet Sel Evol; 2023 Mar; 55(1):21. PubMed ID: 36977978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Prediction of the reliability of genomic breeding values for crossbred performance.
    Vandenplas J; Windig JJ; Calus MPL
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 May; 49(1):43. PubMed ID: 28499351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Genomic evaluation of both purebred and crossbred performances.
    Christensen OF; Madsen P; Nielsen B; Su G
    Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Mar; 46(1):23. PubMed ID: 24666469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Genomic evaluation for a three-way crossbreeding system considering breed-of-origin of alleles.
    Sevillano CA; Vandenplas J; Bastiaansen JWM; Bergsma R; Calus MPL
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Oct; 49(1):75. PubMed ID: 29061123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Nurse capacity, fertility, and litter size in crossbred sows and genetic correlation to purebred sow information.
    Nielsen B; Christensen OF; Velander I
    J Anim Sci; 2016 May; 94(5):1827-33. PubMed ID: 27285680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Using egg production longitudinal recording to study the genetic background of resilience in purebred and crossbred laying hens.
    Bedere N; Berghof TVL; Peeters K; Pinard-van der Laan MH; Visscher J; David I; Mulder HA
    Genet Sel Evol; 2022 Apr; 54(1):26. PubMed ID: 35439920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Reciprocal recurrent selection for 21-day litter weight of crossbred gilts. II. Reproductive performance of purebred females producing purebred and two-way cross litters and performance of purebred and crossbred pigs.
    Young LD; Omtvedt IT; Whatley JA; Johnson RK
    J Anim Sci; 1983 Dec; 57(6):1431-9. PubMed ID: 6674283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Balanced selection on purebred and crossbred performance increases gain in crossbreds.
    Esfandyari H; Berg P; Sørensen AC
    Genet Sel Evol; 2018 Mar; 50(1):8. PubMed ID: 29566647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Empirical determination of breed-of-origin of alleles in three-breed cross pigs.
    Sevillano CA; Vandenplas J; Bastiaansen JW; Calus MP
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Aug; 48(1):55. PubMed ID: 27491547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Estimation of dam line composition of 3-way crossbred animals using genomic information.
    Calus MPL; Henshall JM; Hawken R; Vandenplas J
    Genet Sel Evol; 2022 Jun; 54(1):44. PubMed ID: 35705918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Predicting the impact of genotype-by-genotype interaction on the purebred-crossbred genetic correlation from phenotype and genotype marker data of parental lines.
    Duenk P; Wientjes YCJ; Bijma P; Iversen MW; Lopes MS; Calus MPL
    Genet Sel Evol; 2023 Jan; 55(1):2. PubMed ID: 36639760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Variance components and heritabilities for sow productivity traits estimated from purebred versus crossbred sows.
    Ehlers MJ; Mabry JW; Bertrand JK; Stalder KJ
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2005 Oct; 122(5):318-24. PubMed ID: 16191040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. An experimental comparison of selection alternatives to plateaued response.
    Brown WP; Bell AE
    Genetics; 1980 Feb; 94(2):477-96. PubMed ID: 17249006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Leveraging low-density crossbred genotypes to offset crossbred phenotypes and their impact on purebred predictions.
    Leite NG; Chen CY; Herring WO; Holl J; Tsuruta S; Lourenco D
    J Anim Sci; 2022 Dec; 100(12):. PubMed ID: 36309902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Genomic selection of purebred animals for crossbred performance in the presence of dominant gene action.
    Zeng J; Toosi A; Fernando RL; Dekkers JC; Garrick DJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2013 Apr; 45(1):11. PubMed ID: 23621868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Design of reference populations for genomic selection in crossbreeding programs.
    van Grevenhof IE; van der Werf JH
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Mar; 47(1):14. PubMed ID: 25887562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Assigning breed origin to alleles in crossbred animals.
    Vandenplas J; Calus MP; Sevillano CA; Windig JJ; Bastiaansen JW
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Aug; 48(1):61. PubMed ID: 27549177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Genomic evaluation by including dominance effects and inbreeding depression for purebred and crossbred performance with an application in pigs.
    Xiang T; Christensen OF; Vitezica ZG; Legarra A
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Nov; 48(1):92. PubMed ID: 27887565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. A Review of Genomic Models for the Analysis of Livestock Crossbred Data.
    Stock J; Bennewitz J; Hinrichs D; Wellmann R
    Front Genet; 2020; 11():568. PubMed ID: 32670349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Bias in variance component estimation in swine crossbreeding schemes using selective genotyping and phenotyping strategies.
    See GM; Mote BE; Spangler ML
    J Anim Sci; 2021 Nov; 99(11):. PubMed ID: 34661671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.