142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37820523)
1. Diagnostic accuracy of diffusion weighted imaging compared to magnetic resonance spectroscopy in differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Billy CA; Darmiati S; Prihartono J
Eur J Radiol; 2023 Nov; 168():111124. PubMed ID: 37820523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Multiparametric breast MRI with 3T: Effectivity of combination of contrast enhanced MRI, DWI and 1H single voxel spectroscopy in differentiation of Breast tumors.
Aribal E; Asadov R; Ramazan A; Ugurlu MÜ; Kaya H
Eur J Radiol; 2016 May; 85(5):979-86. PubMed ID: 27130059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Retrospective analysis of the utility of multiparametric MRI for differentiating between benign and malignant breast lesions in women in China.
Fan WX; Chen XF; Cheng FY; Cheng YB; Xu T; Zhu WB; Zhu XL; Li GJ; Li S
Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Jan; 97(4):e9666. PubMed ID: 29369183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Distinguishing between benign and malignant breast lesions using diffusion weighted imaging and intravoxel incoherent motion: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Ma W; Mao J; Wang T; Huang Y; Zhao ZH
Eur J Radiol; 2021 Aug; 141():109809. PubMed ID: 34116452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Breast Lesions: Diagnosis Using Diffusion Weighted Imaging at 1.5T and 3.0T-Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Shi RY; Yao QY; Wu LM; Xu JR
Clin Breast Cancer; 2018 Jun; 18(3):e305-e320. PubMed ID: 28802529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging as an adjunct to dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI to improve accuracy of the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant breast lesions.
Ma D; Lu F; Zou X; Zhang H; Li Y; Zhang L; Chen L; Qin D; Wang B
Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Feb; 36():175-179. PubMed ID: 27742437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic performance of breast tumor tissue selection in diffusion weighted imaging: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Wielema M; Dorrius MD; Pijnappel RM; De Bock GH; Baltzer PAT; Oudkerk M; Sijens PE
PLoS One; 2020; 15(5):e0232856. PubMed ID: 32374781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison and Optimization of 3.0 T Breast Images Quality of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging with Multiple B-Values.
Han X; Li J; Wang X
Acad Radiol; 2017 Apr; 24(4):418-425. PubMed ID: 27955879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diagnostic value of synthetic diffusion-weighted imaging on breast magnetic resonance imaging assessment: comparison with conventional diffusion-weighted imaging.
Yılmaz E; Güldoğan N; Ulus S; Türk EB; Mısır ME; Arslan A; Arıbal ME
Diagn Interv Radiol; 2024 Mar; 30(2):91-98. PubMed ID: 37888786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diffusion-Weighted Imaging With Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Mapping for Breast Cancer Detection as a Stand-Alone Parameter: Comparison With Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced and Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Pinker K; Moy L; Sutton EJ; Mann RM; Weber M; Thakur SB; Jochelson MS; Bago-Horvath Z; Morris EA; Baltzer PA; Helbich TH
Invest Radiol; 2018 Oct; 53(10):587-595. PubMed ID: 29620604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted imaging for differentiating benign and malignant gallbladder lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
You MW; Yun SJ
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Nov; 48(5):1375-1388. PubMed ID: 29676860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of quantitative diffusion-weighted imaging for differentiating benign and malignant pancreatic lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Zhu M; Zhang C; Yan J; Sun J; Zhao X; Zhang L; Yin L
Eur Radiol; 2021 Oct; 31(10):7746-7759. PubMed ID: 33847811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diffusion-weighted imaging or dynamic contrast-enhanced curve: a retrospective analysis of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging-based differential diagnoses of benign and malignant breast lesions.
Yang X; Dong M; Li S; Chai R; Zhang Z; Li N; Zhang L
Eur Radiol; 2020 Sep; 30(9):4795-4805. PubMed ID: 32350660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Can DWI provide additional value to Kaiser score in evaluation of breast lesions.
An Y; Mao G; Ao W; Mao F; Zhang H; Cheng Y; Yang G
Eur Radiol; 2022 Sep; 32(9):5964-5973. PubMed ID: 35357535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diffusion-Weighted Imaging-guided MR Spectroscopy in Breast Lesions using Readout-Segmented Echo-Planar Imaging.
Sun K; Chai W; Fu C; Zhan Y; Shen K; Luo X; Yan F
Eur Radiol; 2016 Jun; 26(6):1565-74. PubMed ID: 26385807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the accuracy of diffusion-weighted MRI in the detection of malignant pulmonary nodules and masses.
Li B; Li Q; Chen C; Guan Y; Liu S
Acad Radiol; 2014 Jan; 21(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 24331261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnostic value of multiple b-value diffusion-weighted imaging in discriminating the malignant from benign breast lesions.
Lin CX; Tian Y; Li JM; Liao ST; Liu YT; Zhan RG; Du ZL; Yu XR
BMC Med Imaging; 2023 Jan; 23(1):10. PubMed ID: 36631781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The value of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging combined with apparent diffusion coefficient in the differentiation of benign and malignant diseases of the breast.
Ao F; Yan Y; Zhang ZL; Li S; Li WJ; Chen GB
Acta Radiol; 2022 Jul; 63(7):891-900. PubMed ID: 34134527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of the breast: comparison of apparent diffusion coefficient values of normal breast tissue with benign and malignant breast lesions.
Orguc S; Basara I; Coskun T
Singapore Med J; 2012 Nov; 53(11):737-43. PubMed ID: 23192501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of magnetic resonance elastography and diffusion-weighted imaging for differentiating benign and malignant liver lesions.
Hennedige TP; Hallinan JT; Leung FP; Teo LL; Iyer S; Wang G; Chang S; Madhavan KK; Wee A; Venkatesh SK
Eur Radiol; 2016 Feb; 26(2):398-406. PubMed ID: 26032879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
