173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37820690)
21. Commissioning of Helium Ion Therapy and the First Patient Treatment With Active Beam Delivery.
Tessonnier T; Ecker S; Besuglow J; Naumann J; Mein S; Longarino FK; Ellerbrock M; Ackermann B; Winter M; Brons S; Qubala A; Haberer T; Debus J; Jäkel O; Mairani A
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2023 Jul; 116(4):935-948. PubMed ID: 36681200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Calculating dose-averaged linear energy transfer in an analytical treatment planning system for carbon-ion radiotherapy.
Wang W; Li P; Shahnazi K; Wu X; Zhao J
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2023 Feb; 24(2):e13866. PubMed ID: 36527366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Impact of TPS calculation algorithms on dose delivered to the patient in proton therapy treatments.
Molinelli S; Russo S; Magro G; Maestri D; Mairani A; Mastella E; Mirandola A; Vai A; Vischioni B; Valvo F; Ciocca M
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Apr; 64(7):075016. PubMed ID: 30802887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Design and commissioning of the non-dedicated scanning proton beamline for ocular treatment at the synchrotron-based CNAO facility.
Ciocca M; Magro G; Mastella E; Mairani A; Mirandola A; Molinelli S; Russo S; Vai A; Fiore MR; Mosci C; Valvo F; Via R; Baroni G; Orecchia R
Med Phys; 2019 Apr; 46(4):1852-1862. PubMed ID: 30659616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Technical Note: Integrating an open source Monte Carlo code "MCsquare" for clinical use in intensity-modulated proton therapy.
Deng W; Younkin JE; Souris K; Huang S; Augustine K; Fatyga M; Ding X; Cohilis M; Bues M; Shan J; Stoker J; Lin L; Shen J; Liu W
Med Phys; 2020 Jun; 47(6):2558-2574. PubMed ID: 32153029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Relative biological effectiveness variation along monoenergetic and modulated Bragg peaks of a 62-MeV therapeutic proton beam: a preclinical assessment.
Chaudhary P; Marshall TI; Perozziello FM; Manti L; Currell FJ; Hanton F; McMahon SJ; Kavanagh JN; Cirrone GA; Romano F; Prise KM; Schettino G
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2014 Sep; 90(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 24986743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Technical note: Impact of beamline-specific particle energy spectra on clinical plans in carbon ion beam therapy.
Resch AF; Schafasand M; Lackner N; Niessen T; Beck S; Elia A; Boersma D; Grevillot L; Fossati P; Glimelius L; Stock M; Georg D; Carlino A
Med Phys; 2022 Jun; 49(6):4092-4098. PubMed ID: 35416302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Proton Treatment Techniques for Posterior Fossa Tumors: Consequences for Linear Energy Transfer and Dose-Volume Parameters for the Brainstem and Organs at Risk.
Giantsoudi D; Adams J; MacDonald SM; Paganetti H
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2017 Feb; 97(2):401-410. PubMed ID: 27986346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Introducing Proton Track-End Objectives in Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy Optimization to Reduce Linear Energy Transfer and Relative Biological Effectiveness in Critical Structures.
Traneus E; Ödén J
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2019 Mar; 103(3):747-757. PubMed ID: 30395906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Proton and helium ion radiotherapy for meningioma tumors: a Monte Carlo-based treatment planning comparison.
Tessonnier T; Mairani A; Chen W; Sala P; Cerutti F; Ferrari A; Haberer T; Debus J; Parodi K
Radiat Oncol; 2018 Jan; 13(1):2. PubMed ID: 29316969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Range uncertainty in proton therapy due to variable biological effectiveness.
Carabe A; Moteabbed M; Depauw N; Schuemann J; Paganetti H
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Mar; 57(5):1159-72. PubMed ID: 22330133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Inclusion of a variable RBE into proton and photon plan comparison for various fractionation schedules in prostate radiation therapy.
Ödén J; Eriksson K; Toma-Dasu I
Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 44(3):810-822. PubMed ID: 28107554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Automated Monte-Carlo re-calculation of proton therapy plans using Geant4/Gate: implementation and comparison to plan-specific quality assurance measurements.
Aitkenhead AH; Sitch P; Richardson JC; Winterhalter C; Patel I; Mackay RI
Br J Radiol; 2020 Oct; 93(1114):20200228. PubMed ID: 32726141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Development and validation of an optimal GATE model for proton pencil-beam scanning delivery.
Asadi A; Akhavanallaf A; Hosseini SA; Vosoughi N; Zaidi H
Z Med Phys; 2023 Nov; 33(4):591-600. PubMed ID: 36424313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Can We Advance Proton Therapy for Prostate? Considering Alternative Beam Angles and Relative Biological Effectiveness Variations When Comparing Against Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy.
Underwood T; Giantsoudi D; Moteabbed M; Zietman A; Efstathiou J; Paganetti H; Lu HM
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2016 May; 95(1):454-464. PubMed ID: 27084660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Commissioning a newly developed treatment planning system, VQA Plan, for fast-raster scanning of carbon-ion beams.
Yagi M; Tsubouchi T; Hamatani N; Takashina M; Maruo H; Fujitaka S; Nihongi H; Ogawa K; Kanai T
PLoS One; 2022; 17(5):e0268087. PubMed ID: 35536852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Difference in LET-based biological doses between IMPT optimization techniques: Robust and PTV-based optimizations.
Hirayama S; Matsuura T; Yasuda K; Takao S; Fujii T; Miyamoto N; Umegaki K; Shimizu S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Apr; 21(4):42-50. PubMed ID: 32150329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Interlaced proton grid therapy - Linear energy transfer and relative biological effectiveness distributions.
Henry T; Ödén J
Phys Med; 2018 Dec; 56():81-89. PubMed ID: 30473384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Dosimetric accuracy of a treatment planning system for actively scanned proton beams and small target volumes: Monte Carlo and experimental validation.
Magro G; Molinelli S; Mairani A; Mirandola A; Panizza D; Russo S; Ferrari A; Valvo F; Fossati P; Ciocca M
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Sep; 60(17):6865-80. PubMed ID: 26301623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Monte Carlo simulations of a low energy proton beamline for radiobiological experiments.
Dahle TJ; Rykkelid AM; Stokkevåg CH; Mairani A; Görgen A; Edin NJ; Rørvik E; Fjæra LF; Malinen E; Ytre-Hauge KS
Acta Oncol; 2017 Jun; 56(6):779-786. PubMed ID: 28464743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
