BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37820833)

  • 1. Cancer Detection Rate and Abnormal Interpretation Rate of Prostate MRI Performed for Clinical Suspicion of Prostate Cancer.
    Nagayama H; Nakai H; Takahashi H; Froemming AT; Kawashima A; Bolan CW; Adamo DA; Carter RE; Fazzio RT; Tsuji S; Lomas DJ; Mynderse LA; Humphreys MR; Dora C; Takahashi N
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2024 Mar; 21(3):398-408. PubMed ID: 37820833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cancer Detection Rate and Abnormal Interpretation Rate of Prostate MRI in Patients With Low-Grade Cancer.
    Nakai H; Nagayama H; Takahashi H; Froemming AT; Kawashima A; Bolan CW; Adamo DA; Carter RE; Fazzio RT; Tsuji S; Lomas DJ; Mynderse LA; Humphreys MR; Dora C; Takahashi N
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2024 Mar; 21(3):387-397. PubMed ID: 37838189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of prostate cancer detection rates between magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy and transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy according to Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System in patients with PSA ≥4 ng/mL: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Zhu K; Qin Z; Xue J; Miao C; Tian Y; Liu S; Zhu S; Gu Q; Hou C; Xu A; Yang J; Wang Z
    Transl Androl Urol; 2019 Dec; 8(6):741-753. PubMed ID: 32038971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Decreased prostate MRI cancer detection rate due to moderate to severe susceptibility artifacts from hip prosthesis.
    Nakai H; Takahashi H; Adamo DA; LeGout JD; Kawashima A; Thomas JV; Froemming AT; Kuanar S; Lomas DJ; Humphreys MR; Dora C; Takahashi N
    Eur Radiol; 2024 May; 34(5):3387-3399. PubMed ID: 37889268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Performance of Combined Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion-guided and Systematic Biopsy of the Prostate in Biopsy-naïve Patients and Patients with Prior Biopsies.
    Preisser F; Theissen L; Wenzel M; Humke C; Bodelle B; Köllermann J; Kluth L; Banek S; Becker A; Roos F; Chun FK; Mandel P
    Eur Urol Focus; 2021 Jan; 7(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 31296485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Combining targeted and systematic prostate biopsy improves prostate cancer detection and correlation with the whole mount histopathology in biopsy naïve and previous negative biopsy patients.
    Mischinger J; Schöllnast H; Zurl H; Geyer M; Fischereder K; Adelsmayr G; Igrec J; Fritz G; Merdzo-Hörmann M; Elstner J; Schmid J; Triebl A; Trimmel V; Reiter C; Steiner J; Rosenlechner D; Seles M; Pichler GP; Pichler M; Riedl J; Schöpfer-Schwab S; Strobl J; Hutterer GC; Zigeuner R; Pummer K; Augustin H; Ahyai S; Mannweiler S; Fuchsjäger M; Talakic E
    Front Surg; 2022; 9():1013389. PubMed ID: 36277287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The detection of significant prostate cancer is correlated with the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) in MRI/transrectal ultrasound fusion biopsy.
    Cash H; Maxeiner A; Stephan C; Fischer T; Durmus T; Holzmann J; Asbach P; Haas M; Hinz S; Neymeyer J; Miller K; Günzel K; Kempkensteffen C
    World J Urol; 2016 Apr; 34(4):525-32. PubMed ID: 26293117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How to make clinical decisions to avoid unnecessary prostate screening in biopsy-naïve men with PI-RADs v2 score ≤ 3?
    Zhang Y; Zeng N; Zhang F; Huang Y; Tian Y
    Int J Clin Oncol; 2020 Jan; 25(1):175-186. PubMed ID: 31473884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Predictors of prostate cancer detection in MRI PI-RADS 3 lesions - Reality of a tertiary center.
    Araújo D; Gromicho A; Dias J; Bastos S; Maciel RM; Sabença A; Xambre L
    Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2023 Dec; 95(4):11830. PubMed ID: 38117217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessing the Clinical Value of Positive Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Young Men with a Suspicion of Prostate Cancer.
    Stabile A; Dell'Oglio P; Soligo M; De Cobelli F; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Esposito A; Brembilla G; Karnes RJ; Montorsi F; Briganti A
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2021 Aug; 4(4):594-600. PubMed ID: 31204312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prospective PI-RADS v2.1 Atypical Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Nodules With Marked Restricted Diffusion: Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer on Multiparametric MRI.
    Costa DN; Jia L; Subramanian N; Xi Y; Rofsky NM; Recchimuzzi DZ; de Leon AD; Arraj P; Pedrosa I
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Aug; 217(2):395-403. PubMed ID: 32876473
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Analysis of the relationship between PI-RADS scores and the pathological results of targeted biopsy based on MRI].
    Wang YM; Shang JW; Dong L; Liang LH; Zhao RZ; Liang C; Wang SQ; Xia W; Cheng G; Hua LX
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2023 Nov; 45(11):942-947. PubMed ID: 37968079
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prevalence of Prostate Cancer in PI-RADS Version 2.1 Transition Zone Atypical Nodules Upgraded by Abnormal DWI: Correlation With MRI-Directed TRUS-Guided Targeted Biopsy.
    Lim CS; Abreu-Gomez J; Carrion I; Schieda N
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Mar; 216(3):683-690. PubMed ID: 32755208
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The value of magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion targeted biopsies for clinical decision-making among patients with previously negative transrectal ultrasound biopsy and persistent prostate-specific antigen elevation.
    Gillis CJ; Southall TM; Wilson R; Anderson M; Young J; Hewitt R; Andrews M
    Can Urol Assoc J; 2022 Jun; 16(6):E315-E320. PubMed ID: 35099383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Predictors of Prostate Cancer at Fusion Biopsy: The Role of Positive Family History, Hypertension, Diabetes, and Body Mass Index.
    Oderda M; Dematteis A; Calleris G; Conti A; D'Agate D; Falcone M; Marquis A; Montefusco G; Marra G; Gontero P
    Curr Oncol; 2023 May; 30(5):4957-4965. PubMed ID: 37232832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A clinical available decision support scheme for optimizing prostate biopsy based on mpMRI.
    Hou Y; Jiang KW; Zhang J; Bao ML; Shi HB; Qu JR; Cheng G; Zhang YD
    Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2022 Apr; 25(4):727-734. PubMed ID: 35067674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Diagnostic Accuracy of Single-plane Biparametric and Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Prostate Cancer: A Randomized Noninferiority Trial in Biopsy-naïve Men.
    Russo F; Mazzetti S; Regge D; Ambrosini I; Giannini V; Manfredi M; De Luca S; Bollito E; Porpiglia F
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2021 Dec; 4(6):855-862. PubMed ID: 33893066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Analysis of PI-RADS 4 cases: Management recommendations for negatively biopsied patients.
    Ullrich T; Arsov C; Quentin M; Laqua N; Klingebiel M; Martin O; Hiester A; Blondin D; Rabenalt R; Albers P; Antoch G; Schimmöller L
    Eur J Radiol; 2019 Apr; 113():1-6. PubMed ID: 30927932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Current role of systematic biopsy in diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer in primary combined MRI-targeted biopsy: a high-volume single-center study.
    Krausewitz P; Fostitsch D; Weiten R; Kluemper N; Stein J; Luetkens J; Kristiansen G; Ellinger J; Ritter M
    World J Urol; 2023 Jan; 41(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 36477403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Results of Targeted Biopsy in Men with Magnetic Resonance Imaging Lesions Classified Equivocal, Likely or Highly Likely to Be Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
    Venderink W; van Luijtelaar A; Bomers JGR; van der Leest M; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa C; Barentsz JO; Sedelaar JPM; Fütterer JJ
    Eur Urol; 2018 Mar; 73(3):353-360. PubMed ID: 28258784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.