These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37820865)

  • 1. Embryo ranking agreement between embryologists and artificial intelligence algorithms.
    Zaninovic N; Sierra JT; Malmsten JE; Rosenwaks Z
    F S Sci; 2024 Feb; 5(1):50-57. PubMed ID: 37820865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Embryologist agreement when assessing blastocyst implantation probability: is data-driven prediction the solution to embryo assessment subjectivity?
    Fordham DE; Rosentraub D; Polsky AL; Aviram T; Wolf Y; Perl O; Devir A; Rosentraub S; Silver DH; Gold Zamir Y; Bronstein AM; Lara Lara M; Ben Nagi J; Alvarez A; Munné S
    Hum Reprod; 2022 Sep; 37(10):2275-2290. PubMed ID: 35944167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A hybrid artificial intelligence model leverages multi-centric clinical data to improve fetal heart rate pregnancy prediction across time-lapse systems.
    Duval A; Nogueira D; Dissler N; Maskani Filali M; Delestro Matos F; Chansel-Debordeaux L; Ferrer-Buitrago M; Ferrer E; Antequera V; Ruiz-Jorro M; Papaxanthos A; Ouchchane H; Keppi B; Prima PY; Regnier-Vigouroux G; Trebesses L; Geoffroy-Siraudin C; Zaragoza S; Scalici E; Sanguinet P; Cassagnard N; Ozanon C; De La Fuente A; Gómez E; Gervoise Boyer M; Boyer P; Ricciarelli E; Pollet-Villard X; Boussommier-Calleja A
    Hum Reprod; 2023 Apr; 38(4):596-608. PubMed ID: 36763673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Discard or not discard, that is the question: an international survey across 117 embryologists on the clinical management of borderline quality blastocysts.
    Chiappetta V; Innocenti F; Coticchio G; Ahlström A; Albricci L; Badajoz V; Hebles M; Gallardo M; Benini F; Canosa S; Kumpošt J; Milton K; Montanino Oliva D; Maggiulli R; Rienzi L; Cimadomo D
    Hum Reprod; 2023 Oct; 38(10):1901-1909. PubMed ID: 37649342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Inter-observer and intra-observer agreement between embryologists during selection of a single Day 5 embryo for transfer: a multicenter study.
    Storr A; Venetis CA; Cooke S; Kilani S; Ledger W
    Hum Reprod; 2017 Feb; 32(2):307-314. PubMed ID: 28031323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Should there be an "AI" in TEAM? Embryologists selection of high implantation potential embryos improves with the aid of an artificial intelligence algorithm.
    Fitz VW; Kanakasabapathy MK; Thirumalaraju P; Kandula H; Ramirez LB; Boehnlein L; Swain JE; Curchoe CL; James K; Dimitriadis I; Souter I; Bormann CL; Shafiee H
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2021 Oct; 38(10):2663-2670. PubMed ID: 34535847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Development of an artificial intelligence-based assessment model for prediction of embryo viability using static images captured by optical light microscopy during IVF.
    VerMilyea M; Hall JMM; Diakiw SM; Johnston A; Nguyen T; Perugini D; Miller A; Picou A; Murphy AP; Perugini M
    Hum Reprod; 2020 Apr; 35(4):770-784. PubMed ID: 32240301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Should we freeze it? Agreement on fate of borderline blastocysts is poor and does not improve with a modified blastocyst grading system.
    Hammond ER; Foong AKM; Rosli N; Morbeck DE
    Hum Reprod; 2020 May; 35(5):1045-1053. PubMed ID: 32358601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Embryo Ranking Intelligent Classification Algorithm (ERICA): artificial intelligence clinical assistant predicting embryo ploidy and implantation.
    Chavez-Badiola A; Flores-Saiffe-Farías A; Mendizabal-Ruiz G; Drakeley AJ; Cohen J
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2020 Oct; 41(4):585-593. PubMed ID: 32843306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Embryo selection through artificial intelligence versus embryologists: a systematic review.
    Salih M; Austin C; Warty RR; Tiktin C; Rolnik DL; Momeni M; Rezatofighi H; Reddy S; Smith V; Vollenhoven B; Horta F
    Hum Reprod Open; 2023; 2023(3):hoad031. PubMed ID: 37588797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Development of an artificial intelligence model for predicting the likelihood of human embryo euploidy based on blastocyst images from multiple imaging systems during IVF.
    Diakiw SM; Hall JMM; VerMilyea MD; Amin J; Aizpurua J; Giardini L; Briones YG; Lim AYX; Dakka MA; Nguyen TV; Perugini D; Perugini M
    Hum Reprod; 2022 Jul; 37(8):1746-1759. PubMed ID: 35674312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. High reliability of morphokinetic annotations among embryologists.
    Martínez M; Santaló J; Rodríguez A; Vassena R
    Hum Reprod Open; 2018; 2018(3):hoy009. PubMed ID: 30895250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Time-lapse algorithms and morphological selection of day-5 embryos for transfer: a preclinical validation study.
    Storr A; Venetis C; Cooke S; Kilani S; Ledger W
    Fertil Steril; 2018 Feb; 109(2):276-283.e3. PubMed ID: 29331237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Consistency and objectivity of automated embryo assessments using deep neural networks.
    Bormann CL; Thirumalaraju P; Kanakasabapathy MK; Kandula H; Souter I; Dimitriadis I; Gupta R; Pooniwala R; Shafiee H
    Fertil Steril; 2020 Apr; 113(4):781-787.e1. PubMed ID: 32228880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A double-blind randomized controlled trial investigating a time-lapse algorithm for selecting Day 5 blastocysts for transfer.
    Ahlström A; Lundin K; Lind AK; Gunnarsson K; Westlander G; Park H; Thurin-Kjellberg A; Thorsteinsdottir SA; Einarsson S; Åström M; Löfdahl K; Menezes J; Callender S; Nyberg C; Winerdal J; Stenfelt C; Jonassen BR; Oldereid N; Nolte L; Sundler M; Hardarson T
    Hum Reprod; 2022 Apr; 37(4):708-717. PubMed ID: 35143661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Improving embryo selection using a computer-automated time-lapse image analysis test plus day 3 morphology: results from a prospective multicenter trial.
    Conaghan J; Chen AA; Willman SP; Ivani K; Chenette PE; Boostanfar R; Baker VL; Adamson GD; Abusief ME; Gvakharia M; Loewke KE; Shen S
    Fertil Steril; 2013 Aug; 100(2):412-9.e5. PubMed ID: 23721712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Human blastocyst spontaneous collapse is associated with worse morphological quality and higher degeneration and aneuploidy rates: a comprehensive analysis standardized through artificial intelligence.
    Cimadomo D; Marconetto A; Trio S; Chiappetta V; Innocenti F; Albricci L; Erlich I; Ben-Meir A; Har-Vardi I; Kantor B; Sakov A; Coticchio G; Borini A; Ubaldi FM; Rienzi L
    Hum Reprod; 2022 Sep; 37(10):2291-2306. PubMed ID: 35939563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical validation of an automatic classification algorithm applied on cleavage stage embryos: analysis for blastulation, euploidy, implantation, and live-birth potential.
    Valera MA; Aparicio-Ruiz B; Pérez-Albalá S; Romany L; Remohí J; Meseguer M
    Hum Reprod; 2023 Jun; 38(6):1060-1075. PubMed ID: 37018626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Deep learning as a predictive tool for fetal heart pregnancy following time-lapse incubation and blastocyst transfer.
    Tran D; Cooke S; Illingworth PJ; Gardner DK
    Hum Reprod; 2019 Jun; 34(6):1011-1018. PubMed ID: 31111884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Interpretable artificial intelligence-assisted embryo selection improved single-blastocyst transfer outcomes: a prospective cohort study.
    Wang S; Chen L; Sun H
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2023 Dec; 47(6):103371. PubMed ID: 37839212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.