BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

252 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37821181)

  • 21. Long-term outcomes of fractional flow reserve-guided vs. angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in contemporary practice.
    Li J; Elrashidi MY; Flammer AJ; Lennon RJ; Bell MR; Holmes DR; Bresnahan JF; Rihal CS; Lerman LO; Lerman A
    Eur Heart J; 2013 May; 34(18):1375-83. PubMed ID: 23344979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Fractional flow reserve guided percutaneous coronary intervention results in reduced ischemic myocardium and improved outcomes.
    Sawant AC; Bhardwaj A; Banerjee K; Jobanputra Y; Kumar A; Parikh P; Kandregula KC; Poddar K; Ellis SG; Nair R; Corbelli J; Kapadia S
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Oct; 92(4):692-700. PubMed ID: 29405553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Three-Year Clinical Impact of Murray Law-Based Quantitative Flow Ratio and OCT- or FFR-Guidance in Angiographically Intermediate Coronary Lesions.
    Aurigemma C; Ding D; Tu S; Li C; Yu W; Li Y; Leone AM; Romagnoli E; Vergallo R; Maino A; Trani C; Wijns W; Burzotta F
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2024 May; 17(5):e013191. PubMed ID: 38660794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. QFR for the Revascularization of Nonculprit Vessels in MI Patients: Insights From the FIRE Trial.
    Erriquez A; Campo G; Guiducci V; Casella G; Menozzi M; Cerrato E; Sacchetta G; Moreno R; Arena M; Amat Santos I; Diez Gil JL; Scarsini R; Ruozzi M; Arioti M; Picchi A; Barbierato M; Moscarella E; Musto D'Amore S; Lanzilotti V; Cavazza C; Rezzaghi M; Cocco M; Marrone A; Verardi FM; Escaned J; Barbato E; Colaiori I; Pesenti N; Carrara G; Biscaglia S
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2024 Jun; 17(12):1425-1436. PubMed ID: 38752972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Angiographic quantitative flow ratio-guided coronary intervention (FAVOR III China): a multicentre, randomised, sham-controlled trial.
    Xu B; Tu S; Song L; Jin Z; Yu B; Fu G; Zhou Y; Wang J; Chen Y; Pu J; Chen L; Qu X; Yang J; Liu X; Guo L; Shen C; Zhang Y; Zhang Q; Pan H; Fu X; Liu J; Zhao Y; Escaned J; Wang Y; Fearon WF; Dou K; Kirtane AJ; Wu Y; Serruys PW; Yang W; Wijns W; Guan C; Leon MB; Qiao S; Stone GW;
    Lancet; 2021 Dec; 398(10317):2149-2159. PubMed ID: 34742368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel disease and acute myocardial infarction.
    Corpus RA; House JA; Marso SP; Grantham JA; Huber KC; Laster SB; Johnson WL; Daniels WC; Barth CW; Giorgi LV; Rutherford BD
    Am Heart J; 2004 Sep; 148(3):493-500. PubMed ID: 15389238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. FFR- Versus Angiography-Guided Revascularization for Nonculprit Stenosis in STEMI and Multivessel Disease: A Network Meta-Analysis.
    Elbadawi A; Dang AT; Hamed M; Eid M; Prakash Hiriyur Prakash M; Saleh M; Gad M; Mamas MA; Rahman F; Elgendy IY
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2022 Mar; 15(6):656-666. PubMed ID: 35331458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparing the adverse clinical outcomes associated with fraction flow reserve-guided versus angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Bundhun PK; Yanamala CM; Huang F
    BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2016 Dec; 16(1):249. PubMed ID: 27912739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Coronary Intervention Guided by Quantitative Flow Ratio vs Angiography in Patients With or Without Diabetes.
    Jin Z; Xu B; Yang X; Jia R; Meng S; Hu H; Deng Y; Cao X; Ruan Y; Han J; Liu J; Qu X; Zhou Y; Wang J; Fu G; Yu B; Wang Y; Guan C; Song L; Tu S; Qiao S; Stone GW;
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2022 Sep; 80(13):1254-1264. PubMed ID: 36137676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. FFR-Guided Complete or Culprit-Only PCI in Patients with Myocardial Infarction.
    Böhm F; Mogensen B; Engstrøm T; Stankovic G; Srdanovic I; Lønborg J; Zwackman S; Hamid M; Kellerth T; Lauermann J; Kajander OA; Andersson J; Linder R; Angerås O; Renlund H; Ērglis A; Menon M; Schultz C; Laine M; Held C; Rück A; Östlund O; James S;
    N Engl J Med; 2024 Apr; 390(16):1481-1492. PubMed ID: 38587995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Timing of fractional flow reserve-guided complete revascularization in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction with multivessel disease: Rationale and design of the OPTION-STEMI trial.
    Kim MC; Ahn JH; Hyun DY; Lim Y; Lee SH; Oh S; Cho KH; Sim DS; Hong YJ; Kim JH; Jeong MH; Cho JH; Lee SR; Kang DO; Hwang JY; Youn YJ; Jeong YH; Park Y; Kim DB; Choo EH; Kim CJ; Kim W; Rhew JY; Lee JH; Yoo SY; Ahn Y;
    Am Heart J; 2024 Jul; 273():35-43. PubMed ID: 38641031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Differential Prognostic Value of Revascularization for Coronary Stenosis With Intermediate FFR by Coronary Flow Reserve.
    Kim J; Shin D; Lee JM; Lee SH; Hong D; Choi KH; Hwang D; Boerhout CKM; de Waard GA; Jung JH; Mejia-Renteria H; Hoshino M; Echavarria-Pinto M; Meuwissen M; Matsuo H; Madera-Cambero M; Eftekhari A; Effat MA; Murai T; Marques K; Doh JH; Christiansen EH; Banerjee R; Kim HK; Nam CW; Niccoli G; Nakayama M; Tanaka N; Shin ES; Chamuleau SAJ; van Royen N; Knaapen P; Koo BK; Kakuta T; Escaned J; Piek JJ; van de Hoef TP;
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2022 May; 15(10):1033-1043. PubMed ID: 35490124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Clinical Outcomes of Deferred Lesions by IVUS Versus FFR-Guided Treatment Decision.
    Lee JM; Kim H; Hong D; Hwang D; Zhang J; Hu X; Jiang J; Nam CW; Doh JH; Lee BK; Kim W; Huang J; Jiang F; Zhou H; Chen P; Tang L; Jiang W; Chen X; He W; Kang J; Ahn SG; Yoon MH; Kim U; Ki YJ; Shin ES; Choi KH; Park TK; Yang JH; Song YB; Choi SH; Gwon HC; Koo BK; Kim HS; Tahk SJ; Wang J; Hahn JY;
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2023 Dec; 16(12):e013308. PubMed ID: 38018840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Angiography-guided Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Ischemia-guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Medical Therapy in the Management of Significant Disease in Non-Infarct-related Arteries in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients With Multivessel Coronary Disease.
    Perera D; Crake T; Lee V
    Crit Pathw Cardiol; 2018 Jun; 17(2):77-82. PubMed ID: 29768315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Quantitative flow ratio virtual stenting and post stenting correlations to post stenting fractional flow reserve measurements from the DOCTORS (Does Optical Coherence Tomography Optimize Results of Stenting) study population.
    Rubimbura V; Guillon B; Fournier S; Amabile N; Chi Pan C; Combaret N; Eeckhout E; Kibler M; Silvain J; Wijns W; Schiele F; Muller O; Meneveau N; Adjedj J
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Nov; 96(6):1145-1153. PubMed ID: 31763775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Fractional flow reserve in unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction experience from the FAME (Fractional flow reserve versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) study.
    Sels JW; Tonino PA; Siebert U; Fearon WF; Van't Veer M; De Bruyne B; Pijls NH
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2011 Nov; 4(11):1183-9. PubMed ID: 22115657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The impact of sex differences on fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: a FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) substudy.
    Kim HS; Tonino PA; De Bruyne B; Yong AS; Tremmel JA; Pijls NH; Fearon WF;
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 Oct; 5(10):1037-42. PubMed ID: 23078733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Angiography versus FFR guided complete revascularization versus culprit-only revascularization for patients presenting with STEMI: Network meta-analysis.
    Okuya Y; Gohil K; Moussa ID
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2022 Sep; 100(3):340-350. PubMed ID: 35789058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention.
    Tonino PA; De Bruyne B; Pijls NH; Siebert U; Ikeno F; van' t Veer M; Klauss V; Manoharan G; Engstrøm T; Oldroyd KG; Ver Lee PN; MacCarthy PA; Fearon WF;
    N Engl J Med; 2009 Jan; 360(3):213-24. PubMed ID: 19144937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. QFR-Based Virtual PCI or Conventional Angiography to Guide PCI: The AQVA Trial.
    Biscaglia S; Verardi FM; Tebaldi M; Guiducci V; Caglioni S; Campana R; Scala A; Marrone A; Pompei G; Marchini F; Scancarello D; Pignatelli G; D'Amore SM; Colaiori I; Demola P; Di Serafino L; Tumscitz C; Penzo C; Erriquez A; Manfrini M; Campo G
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2023 Apr; 16(7):783-794. PubMed ID: 36898939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.