These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37821465)

  • 1. The effects of lineup size on the processes underlying eyewitness decisions.
    Menne NM; Winter K; Bell R; Buchner A
    Sci Rep; 2023 Oct; 13(1):17190. PubMed ID: 37821465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. On the possible advantages of combining small lineups with instructions that discourage guessing-based selection.
    Therre A; Bell R; Menne NM; Mayer C; Lichtenhagen U; Buchner A
    Sci Rep; 2024 Jun; 14(1):14126. PubMed ID: 38898071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Measuring lineup fairness from eyewitness identification data using a multinomial processing tree model.
    Menne NM; Winter K; Bell R; Buchner A
    Sci Rep; 2023 Apr; 13(1):6290. PubMed ID: 37072473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Experimental validation of a multinomial processing tree model for analyzing eyewitness identification decisions.
    Winter K; Menne NM; Bell R; Buchner A
    Sci Rep; 2022 Sep; 12(1):15571. PubMed ID: 36114219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluating the impact of first-yes-counts instructions on eyewitness performance using the two-high threshold eyewitness identification model.
    Winter K; Menne NM; Bell R; Buchner A
    Sci Rep; 2023 Apr; 13(1):6572. PubMed ID: 37085508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A validation of the two-high threshold eyewitness identification model by reanalyzing published data.
    Menne NM; Winter K; Bell R; Buchner A
    Sci Rep; 2022 Aug; 12(1):13379. PubMed ID: 35927288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. New signal detection theory-based framework for eyewitness performance in lineups.
    Lee J; Penrod SD
    Law Hum Behav; 2019 Oct; 43(5):436-454. PubMed ID: 31368723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. sdtlu: An R package for the signal detection analysis of eyewitness lineup data.
    Cohen AL; Starns JJ; Rotello CM
    Behav Res Methods; 2021 Feb; 53(1):278-300. PubMed ID: 32700238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Phenotypic mismatch between suspects and fillers but not phenotypic bias increases eyewitness identifications of Black suspects.
    Jones JM; Katzman J; Kovera MB
    Front Psychol; 2024; 15():1233782. PubMed ID: 38680285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The single lineup paradigm: A new way to manipulate target presence in eyewitness identification experiments.
    Oriet C; Fitzgerald RJ
    Law Hum Behav; 2018 Feb; 42(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 29461076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Why are lineups better than showups? A test of the filler siphoning and enhanced discriminability accounts.
    Colloff MF; Wixted JT
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2020 Mar; 26(1):124-143. PubMed ID: 30883151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Optimizing the selection of fillers in police lineups.
    Colloff MF; Wilson BM; Seale-Carlisle TM; Wixted JT
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2021 Feb; 118(8):. PubMed ID: 33593908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of lineup size on eyewitness identification.
    Akan M; Robinson MM; Mickes L; Wixted JT; Benjamin AS
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2021 Jun; 27(2):369-392. PubMed ID: 33271047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Estimation of eyewitness error rates in fair and biased lineups.
    Fitzgerald RJ; Tredoux CG; Juncu S
    Law Hum Behav; 2023 Aug; 47(4):463-483. PubMed ID: 37471013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. fullROC: An R package for generating and analyzing eyewitness-lineup ROC curves.
    Yang Y; Smith AM
    Behav Res Methods; 2023 Apr; 55(3):1259-1274. PubMed ID: 35641680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Do masked-face lineups facilitate eyewitness identification of a masked individual?
    Manley KD; Chan JCK; Wells GL
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2019 Sep; 25(3):396-409. PubMed ID: 30556719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Active exploration of faces in police lineups increases discrimination accuracy.
    Colloff MF; Flowe HD; Smith HMJ; Seale-Carlisle TM; Meissner CA; Rockey JC; Pande B; Kujur P; Parveen N; Chandel P; Singh MM; Pradhan S; Parganiha A
    Am Psychol; 2022; 77(2):196-220. PubMed ID: 34793182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. PC_Eyewitness and the sequential superiority effect: computer-based lineup administration.
    MacLin OH; Zimmerman LA; Malpass RS
    Law Hum Behav; 2005 Jun; 29(3):303-21. PubMed ID: 15965630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The impact of eyewitness identifications from simultaneous and sequential lineups.
    Wright DB
    Memory; 2007 Oct; 15(7):746-54. PubMed ID: 17852725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Identifying the guilty word: Simultaneous versus sequential lineups for DRM word lists.
    Finley JR; Wixted JT; Roediger HL
    Mem Cognit; 2020 Aug; 48(6):903-919. PubMed ID: 32222916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.