174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37821919)
21. Adverse Disease Features in Gleason Score 3 + 4 "Favorable Intermediate-Risk" Prostate Cancer: Implications for Active Surveillance.
Morlacco A; Cheville JC; Rangel LJ; Gearman DJ; Karnes RJ
Eur Urol; 2017 Sep; 72(3):442-447. PubMed ID: 27574819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The added value of percentage of free to total prostate-specific antigen, PCA3, and a kallikrein panel to the ERSPC risk calculator for prostate cancer in prescreened men.
Vedder MM; de Bekker-Grob EW; Lilja HG; Vickers AJ; van Leenders GJ; Steyerberg EW; Roobol MJ
Eur Urol; 2014 Dec; 66(6):1109-15. PubMed ID: 25168616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Multicenter Optimization and Validation of a 2-Gene mRNA Urine Test for Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer before Initial Prostate Biopsy.
Haese A; Trooskens G; Steyaert S; Hessels D; Brawer M; Vlaeminck-Guillem V; Ruffion A; Tilki D; Schalken J; Groskopf J; Van Criekinge W
J Urol; 2019 Aug; 202(2):256-263. PubMed ID: 31026217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Prostate cancer screening using a combination of risk-prediction, MRI, and targeted prostate biopsies (STHLM3-MRI): a prospective, population-based, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial.
Nordström T; Discacciati A; Bergman M; Clements M; Aly M; Annerstedt M; Glaessgen A; Carlsson S; Jäderling F; Eklund M; Grönberg H;
Lancet Oncol; 2021 Sep; 22(9):1240-1249. PubMed ID: 34391509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Combined value of validated clinical and genomic risk stratification tools for predicting prostate cancer mortality in a high-risk prostatectomy cohort.
Cooperberg MR; Davicioni E; Crisan A; Jenkins RB; Ghadessi M; Karnes RJ
Eur Urol; 2015 Feb; 67(2):326-33. PubMed ID: 24998118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Multi-cohort modeling strategies for scalable globally accessible prostate cancer risk tools.
Tolksdorf J; Kattan MW; Boorjian SA; Freedland SJ; Saba K; Poyet C; Guerrios L; De Hoedt A; Liss MA; Leach RJ; Hernandez J; Vertosick E; Vickers AJ; Ankerst DP
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Oct; 19(1):191. PubMed ID: 31615451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Prediction of High-grade Prostate Cancer Following Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Improving the Rotterdam European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer Risk Calculators.
Alberts AR; Roobol MJ; Verbeek JFM; Schoots IG; Chiu PK; Osses DF; Tijsterman JD; Beerlage HP; Mannaerts CK; Schimmöller L; Albers P; Arsov C
Eur Urol; 2019 Feb; 75(2):310-318. PubMed ID: 30082150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Avoiding Unnecessary Biopsy: MRI-based Risk Models versus a PI-RADS and PSA Density Strategy for Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
Deniffel D; Healy GM; Dong X; Ghai S; Salinas-Miranda E; Fleshner N; Hamilton R; Kulkarni G; Toi A; van der Kwast T; Zlotta A; Finelli A; Perlis N; Haider MA
Radiology; 2021 Aug; 300(2):369-379. PubMed ID: 34032510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A Multicentre Evaluation of the Role of the Prostate Health Index (PHI) in Regions with Differing Prevalence of Prostate Cancer: Adjustment of PHI Reference Ranges is Needed for European and Asian Settings.
Chiu PK; Ng CF; Semjonow A; Zhu Y; Vincendeau S; Houlgatte A; Lazzeri M; Guazzoni G; Stephan C; Haese A; Bruijne I; Teoh JY; Leung CH; Casale P; Chiang CH; Tan LG; Chiong E; Huang CY; Wu HC; Nieboer D; Ye DW; Bangma CH; Roobol MJ
Eur Urol; 2019 Apr; 75(4):558-561. PubMed ID: 30396635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Predicting Biopsy Outcomes During Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer: External Validation of the Canary Prostate Active Surveillance Study Risk Calculators in Five Large Active Surveillance Cohorts.
Drost FH; Nieboer D; Morgan TM; Carroll PR; Roobol MJ;
Eur Urol; 2019 Nov; 76(5):693-702. PubMed ID: 31451332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Improving prostate cancer detection in veterans through the development of a clinical decision rule for prostate biopsy.
Hill OT; Mason TJ; Schwartz SW; Foulis PR
BMC Urol; 2013 Jan; 13():6. PubMed ID: 23356551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Multiparametric MRI in detection and staging of prostate cancer.
Boesen L
Dan Med J; 2017 Feb; 64(2):. PubMed ID: 28157066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Improving the Rotterdam European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator for Initial Prostate Biopsy by Incorporating the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology Gleason Grading and Cribriform growth.
Roobol MJ; Verbeek JFM; van der Kwast T; Kümmerlin IP; Kweldam CF; van Leenders GJLH
Eur Urol; 2017 Jul; 72(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 28162815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A molecular signature of PCA3 and ERG exosomal RNA from non-DRE urine is predictive of initial prostate biopsy result.
Donovan MJ; Noerholm M; Bentink S; Belzer S; Skog J; O'Neill V; Cochran JS; Brown GA
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2015 Dec; 18(4):370-5. PubMed ID: 26345389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Prostate Health Index improves multivariable risk prediction of aggressive prostate cancer.
Loeb S; Shin SS; Broyles DL; Wei JT; Sanda M; Klee G; Partin AW; Sokoll L; Chan DW; Bangma CH; van Schaik RHN; Slawin KM; Marks LS; Catalona WJ
BJU Int; 2017 Jul; 120(1):61-68. PubMed ID: 27743489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Prediction of prostate cancer risk: the role of prostate volume and digital rectal examination in the ERSPC risk calculators.
Roobol MJ; van Vugt HA; Loeb S; Zhu X; Bul M; Bangma CH; van Leenders AG; Steyerberg EW; Schröder FH
Eur Urol; 2012 Mar; 61(3):577-83. PubMed ID: 22104592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A urine-based DNA methylation assay, ProCUrE, to identify clinically significant prostate cancer.
Zhao F; Olkhov-Mitsel E; Kamdar S; Jeyapala R; Garcia J; Hurst R; Hanna MY; Mills R; Tuzova AV; O'Reilly E; Kelly S; Cooper C; ; Brewer D; Perry AS; Clark J; Fleshner N; Bapat B
Clin Epigenetics; 2018 Nov; 10(1):147. PubMed ID: 30470249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Selective detection of histologically aggressive prostate cancer: an Early Detection Research Network Prediction model to reduce unnecessary prostate biopsies with validation in the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial.
Williams SB; Salami S; Regan MM; Ankerst DP; Wei JT; Rubin MA; Thompson IM; Sanda MG
Cancer; 2012 May; 118(10):2651-8. PubMed ID: 22006057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Prostate cancer screening in men aged 50-69 years (STHLM3): a prospective population-based diagnostic study.
Grönberg H; Adolfsson J; Aly M; Nordström T; Wiklund P; Brandberg Y; Thompson J; Wiklund F; Lindberg J; Clements M; Egevad L; Eklund M
Lancet Oncol; 2015 Dec; 16(16):1667-76. PubMed ID: 26563502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Personalised biopsy schedules based on risk of Gleason upgrading for patients with low-risk prostate cancer on active surveillance.
Tomer A; Nieboer D; Roobol MJ; Bjartell A; Steyerberg EW; Rizopoulos D;
BJU Int; 2021 Jan; 127(1):96-107. PubMed ID: 32531869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
