297 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37821934)
41. Cost-Effectiveness of Cemiplimab Versus Standard of Care in the United States for First-Line Treatment of Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer With Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Expression ≥50.
Kuznik A; Smare C; Chen CI; Venkatachalam M; Keeping S; Atsou K; Xu Y; Wilson F; Guyot P; Chan K; Glowienka E; Konidaris G
Value Health; 2022 Feb; 25(2):203-214. PubMed ID: 35094793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Cost Effectiveness of Adding Pembrolizumab to Platinum and Fluoropyrimidine-Based Chemotherapy as First-Line Treatment for Advanced Esophageal Cancer: A US Healthcare Payer's Perspective.
Qu T; Zhang S; Zhong Y; Meng Y; Guo H; Joo S; Enzinger PC
Pharmacoeconomics; 2022 Dec; 40(12):1247-1259. PubMed ID: 36241842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Immune Checkpoint Blockade Therapy in Patients With Colorectal Cancer Harboring Microsatellite Instability/Mismatch Repair Deficiency in 2022.
André T; Cohen R; Salem ME
Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book; 2022 Apr; 42():1-9. PubMed ID: 35471834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Lenvatinib Plus Pembrolizumab vs. Chemotherapy in Pretreated Patients With Advanced Endometrial Cancer: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.
Feng M; Chen Y; Yang Y; Li Q
Front Public Health; 2022; 10():881034. PubMed ID: 35619813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Efficacy of Pembrolizumab in Patients With Noncolorectal High Microsatellite Instability/Mismatch Repair-Deficient Cancer: Results From the Phase II KEYNOTE-158 Study.
Marabelle A; Le DT; Ascierto PA; Di Giacomo AM; De Jesus-Acosta A; Delord JP; Geva R; Gottfried M; Penel N; Hansen AR; Piha-Paul SA; Doi T; Gao B; Chung HC; Lopez-Martin J; Bang YJ; Frommer RS; Shah M; Ghori R; Joe AK; Pruitt SK; Diaz LA
J Clin Oncol; 2020 Jan; 38(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 31682550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Pembrolizumab in microsatellite instability high or mismatch repair deficient cancers: updated analysis from the phase II KEYNOTE-158 study.
Maio M; Ascierto PA; Manzyuk L; Motola-Kuba D; Penel N; Cassier PA; Bariani GM; De Jesus Acosta A; Doi T; Longo F; Miller WH; Oh DY; Gottfried M; Xu L; Jin F; Norwood K; Marabelle A
Ann Oncol; 2022 Sep; 33(9):929-938. PubMed ID: 35680043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Pembrolizumab in Asian patients with microsatellite-instability-high/mismatch-repair-deficient colorectal cancer.
Yoshino T; Andre T; Kim TW; Yong WP; Shiu KK; Jensen BV; Jensen LH; Punt CJA; Smith D; Garcia-Carbonero R; Alcaide-Garcia J; Gibbs P; de la Fouchardiere C; Rivera F; Elez E; Le DT; Adachi N; Fogelman D; Marinello P; Diaz LA
Cancer Sci; 2023 Mar; 114(3):1026-1036. PubMed ID: 36369901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Nivolumab vs Pembrolizumab for Treatment of US Patients With Platinum-Refractory Recurrent or Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Network Meta-analysis and Cost-effectiveness Analysis.
Pei R; Shi Y; Lv S; Dai T; Zhang F; Liu S; Wu B
JAMA Netw Open; 2021 May; 4(5):e218065. PubMed ID: 33956130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab for treatment of platinum-resistant recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in China: an economic analysis based on a randomised, open-label, phase III trial.
Xin W; Ding H; Fang Q; Zheng X; Tong Y; Xu G; Yang G
BMJ Open; 2020 Dec; 10(12):e038867. PubMed ID: 33371020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Cost-effectiveness of Pembrolizumab for Patients with Advanced, Unresectable, or Metastatic Urothelial Cancer Ineligible for Cisplatin-based Therapy.
Patterson K; Prabhu V; Xu R; Li H; Meng Y; Zarabi N; Zhong Y; Batteson R; Pellissier J; Keefe S; Grivas P; de Wit R
Eur Urol Oncol; 2019 Sep; 2(5):565-571. PubMed ID: 31412011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Immunotherapy plus chemotherapy in patients with advanced endometrial cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Zhu Y; Liu K; Zhu H
J Gynecol Oncol; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38857909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. FDA Approval Summary: Pembrolizumab for the First-line Treatment of Patients with MSI-H/dMMR Advanced Unresectable or Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma.
Casak SJ; Marcus L; Fashoyin-Aje L; Mushti SL; Cheng J; Shen YL; Pierce WF; Her L; Goldberg KB; Theoret MR; Kluetz PG; Pazdur R; Lemery SJ
Clin Cancer Res; 2021 Sep; 27(17):4680-4684. PubMed ID: 33846198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. First-line pembrolizumab in PD-L1 positive non-small-cell lung cancer: A cost-effectiveness analysis from the UK health care perspective.
Hu X; Hay JW
Lung Cancer; 2018 Sep; 123():166-171. PubMed ID: 30089590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Pembrolizumab Plus Pemetrexed and Platinum
Cai Y; Hui W; Zhu M; Zhang M; Gao Z; Wu H
Front Oncol; 2021; 11():768035. PubMed ID: 34900717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Cost-effectiveness analysis of cemiplimab vs pembrolizumab for treatment of advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma.
Paul E; Konidaris G; Cope S; Chen CI; Keeping S; Xu Y; Atsou K; Ayers D; Guyot P; Sasane M; Mojebi A; Kuznik A
J Manag Care Spec Pharm; 2021 Nov; 27(11):1513-1525. PubMed ID: 34351214
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab for the adjuvant treatment of resected high-risk stage III melanoma in the United States.
Bensimon AG; Zhou ZY; Jenkins M; Song Y; Gao W; Signorovitch J; Krepler C; Liu FX; Wang J; Aguiar-Ibáñez R
J Med Econ; 2019 Oct; 22(10):981-993. PubMed ID: 31012765
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Cost-effectiveness of Pembrolizumab as a Second-Line Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Chiang CL; Chan SK; Lee SF; Wong IO; Choi HC
JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Jan; 4(1):e2033761. PubMed ID: 33464318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Cost-effectiveness analysis of cetuximab combined with chemotherapy as a first-line treatment for patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer based on the TAILOR trial.
Wang H; Huang L; Gao P; Zhu Z; Ye W; Ding H; Fang L
BMJ Open; 2020 Feb; 10(2):e030738. PubMed ID: 32051297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Cost-Effectiveness of Ribociclib plus Letrozole Versus Palbociclib plus Letrozole and Letrozole Monotherapy in the First-Line Treatment of Postmenopausal Women with HR+/HER2- Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer: A U.S. Payer Perspective.
Mistry R; May JR; Suri G; Young K; Brixner D; Oderda G; Biskupiak J; Tang D; Bhattacharyya S; Mishra D; Bhattacharyya D; Dalal AA
J Manag Care Spec Pharm; 2018 Jun; 24(6):514-523. PubMed ID: 29799329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Real-world study on microsatellite instability and mismatch repair deficiency testing patterns among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer in Spain.
Garcia-Carbonero R; González Astorga B; Vidal Tocino R; Contreras Toledo D; Pericay C; Fernández Montes A; Falcó E; González Cordero M; Reina Zoilo JJ; Alonso V; Rodríguez Salas N; Gil-Raga M; Santos C; Páez D; Anton-Pascual B; Aguilar F; Morales P
Clin Transl Oncol; 2024 Apr; 26(4):864-871. PubMed ID: 37651021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]