83 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3782275)
1. Our eight-year experience with human umbilical vein grafts.
Motta G; Ratto GB; Sacco A; Canepa G
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 1986; 27(6):709-13. PubMed ID: 3782275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Femoropopliteal bypass using autogenous vein and modified human umbilical vein. A comparative study.
Parker HJ; Fell G; Devine TJ; King RB
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 1988; 29(6):727-32. PubMed ID: 3209617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Composite sequential grafts for femorocrural bypass reconstruction: experience with a modified technique.
Mahmood A; Garnham A; Sintler M; Smith SR; Vohra RK; Simms MH
J Vasc Surg; 2002 Oct; 36(4):772-8. PubMed ID: 12368738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Late results with Dardik-biograft in peripheral arterial surgery.
Raithel D; Schweiger H; Gentsch HH
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 1984; 25(3):222-4. PubMed ID: 6736116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The use of composite grafts in femorocrural bypasses performed for limb salvage: a review of 108 consecutive cases and comparison with 57 in situ saphenous vein bypasses.
Feinberg RL; Winter RP; Wheeler JR; Gregory RT; Snyder SO; Gayle RG; Parent FN; Adcock GD
J Vasc Surg; 1990 Sep; 12(3):257-63. PubMed ID: 2398584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. PTFE-vein composite grafts for critical limb ischaemia: a valuable alternative to all-autogenous infrageniculate reconstructions.
Bastounis E; Georgopoulos S; Maltezos C; Alexiou D; Chiotopoulos D; Bramis J
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 1999 Aug; 18(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 10426969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The consequences of a failed femoropopliteal bypass grafting: comparison of saphenous vein and PTFE grafts.
Jackson MR; Belott TP; Dickason T; Kaiser WJ; Modrall JG; Valentine RJ; Clagett GP
J Vasc Surg; 2000 Sep; 32(3):498-504; 504-5. PubMed ID: 10957656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Autogenous composite vein bypass graft for infrainguinal arterial reconstruction.
Chew DK; Conte MS; Donaldson MC; Whittemore AD; Mannick JA; Belkin M
J Vasc Surg; 2001 Feb; 33(2):259-64; discussion 264-5. PubMed ID: 11174776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Femoro-distal bypass for critical ischemia: is the use of prosthetic grafts justified?
Harris PL; Campbell H
Ann Vasc Surg; 1986 May; 1(1):66-72. PubMed ID: 3504692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of modified human umbilical vein as an arterial substitute in femoropopliteal reconstructive surgical procedures.
Lee BY; Trainor FS; Kavner D; McCann WJ
Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1978 Nov; 147(5):721-5. PubMed ID: 102043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Umbilical vein bypass in patients with severe lower limb ischemia: a report of 121 consecutive cases.
Andersen LI; Nielsen OM; Buchardt Hansen HJ
Surgery; 1985 Mar; 97(3):294-9. PubMed ID: 3975850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Infrapopliteal bypass grafting: use of upper limb vein alone and in autogenous composite grafts.
Graham JW; Lusby RJ
Surgery; 1982 Jun; 91(6):646-9. PubMed ID: 7079964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative decades of experience with glutaraldehyde-tanned human umbilical cord vein graft for lower limb revascularization: an analysis of 1275 cases.
Dardik H; Wengerter K; Qin F; Pangilinan A; Silvestri F; Wolodiger F; Kahn M; Sussman B; Ibrahim IM
J Vasc Surg; 2002 Jan; 35(1):64-71. PubMed ID: 11802134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of hormone replacement therapy on graft patency after femoropopliteal bypass grafting.
Timaran CH; Stevens SL; Grandas OH; Piercy KT; Freeman MB; Goldman MH
J Vasc Surg; 2000 Sep; 32(3):506-16; 516-8. PubMed ID: 10957657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The value of adjunctive vein patches to improve the outcome of femorodistal polytetrafluoroethylene bypass grafts.
Flis V; Pavlović M; Miksic K
Wien Klin Wochenschr; 2001; 113 Suppl 3():5-10. PubMed ID: 15503612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Long-term results of PTFE trilaminate graft versus venous graft and composite graft for below-the-knee revascularization.
Mazzaccaro D; De Febis E; Settembrini AM; Tassinari L; Carmo M; Settembrini PG
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 2014 Oct; 55(5):685-91. PubMed ID: 25008059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. In situ saphenous vein arterial bypass for infrainguinal revascularization: initial experience using an open technique.
de Mello AV; Santos CM; Silva JL; Souza MT; Portilho MA; Guimarães AV; Freitas RG; Silvério JW
Int Angiol; 1991; 10(3):126-32. PubMed ID: 1765713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Late results with biograft in peripheral arterial surgery].
Matsui Y; Goh K; Sakuma M; Yasuda K; Tanabe T
Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi; 1990 Mar; 91(3):419-23. PubMed ID: 2359399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Femoropopliteal bypass: in situ or reversed vein grafts? Ten-year results of a randomized prospective study.
Watelet J; Soury P; Menard JF; Plissonnier D; Peillon C; Lestrat JP; Testart J
Ann Vasc Surg; 1997 Sep; 11(5):510-9. PubMed ID: 9302064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A meta-analysis to compare Dacron versus polytetrafluroethylene grafts for above-knee femoropopliteal artery bypass.
Rychlik IJ; Davey P; Murphy J; O'Donnell ME
J Vasc Surg; 2014 Aug; 60(2):506-15. PubMed ID: 24973288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
