BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37823287)

  • 1. Postoperative Dural Sac Cross-Sectional Area as an Association for Outcome After Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Clinical and Radiologic Results From the NORDSTEN-Spinal Stenosis Trial (Spine, May 15, 2023).
    Hermansen E; Indrekvam K; Weber C; Brisby H
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2024 Jan; 49(1):E10. PubMed ID: 37823287
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Postoperative Dural Sac Cross-Sectional Area as an Association for Outcome After Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Clinical and Radiologic Results From the NORDSTEN-Spinal Stenosis Trial ( Spine , May 15, 2023).
    Bednar DA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2024 Jan; 49(1):E8-E9. PubMed ID: 37737670
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dural Sac Cross-sectional area change from preoperatively and up to 2 years after decompressive surgery for central lumbar spinal stenosis: investigation of operated levels, data from the NORDSTEN study.
    Hermansen E; Myklebust TÅ; Austevoll IM; Hellum C; Storheim K; Banitalebi H; Indrekvam K; Brisby H
    Eur Spine J; 2024 Jun; 33(6):2234-2241. PubMed ID: 38587545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparable increases in dural sac area after three different posterior decompression techniques for lumbar spinal stenosis: radiological results from a randomized controlled trial in the NORDSTEN study.
    Hermansen E; Austevoll IM; Hellum C; Storheim K; Myklebust TÅ; Aaen J; Banitalebi H; Anvar M; Rekeland F; Brox JI; Franssen E; Weber C; Solberg T; Haug KJ; Grundnes O; Brisby H; Indrekvam K
    Eur Spine J; 2020 Sep; 29(9):2254-2261. PubMed ID: 32556585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Postoperative Dural Sac Cross-Sectional Area as an Association for Outcome After Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Clinical and Radiological Results From the NORDSTEN-Spinal Stenosis Trial.
    Hermansen E; Myklebust TÅ; Weber C; Brisby H; Austevoll IM; Hellum C; Storheim K; Aaen J; Banitalebi H; Brox JI; Grundnes O; Rekeland F; Solberg T; Franssen E; Indrekvam K
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2023 May; 48(10):688-694. PubMed ID: 36809364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Study-protocol for a randomized controlled trial comparing clinical and radiological results after three different posterior decompression techniques for lumbar spinal stenosis: the Spinal Stenosis Trial (SST) (part of the NORDSTEN Study).
    Hermansen E; Austevoll IM; Romild UK; Rekeland F; Solberg T; Storheim K; Grundnes O; Aaen J; Brox JI; Hellum C; Indrekvam K
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2017 Mar; 18(1):121. PubMed ID: 28327114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reliability of preoperative MRI findings in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Banitalebi H; Espeland A; Anvar M; Hermansen E; Hellum C; Brox JI; Myklebust TÅ; Indrekvam K; Brisby H; Weber C; Aaen J; Austevoll IM; Grundnes O; Negård A
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2022 Jan; 23(1):51. PubMed ID: 35033042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dural sac cross-sectional area and morphological grade show significant associations with patient-rated outcome of surgery for lumbar central spinal stenosis.
    Mannion AF; Fekete TF; Pacifico D; O'Riordan D; Nauer S; von Büren M; Schizas C
    Eur Spine J; 2017 Oct; 26(10):2552-2564. PubMed ID: 28856447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The association between preoperative MRI findings and clinical improvement in patients included in the NORDSTEN spinal stenosis trial.
    Aaen J; Banitalebi H; Austevoll IM; Hellum C; Storheim K; Myklebust TÅ; Anvar M; Weber C; Solberg T; Grundnes O; Brisby H; Indrekvam K; Hermansen E
    Eur Spine J; 2022 Oct; 31(10):2777-2785. PubMed ID: 35930062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Digital computed tomography evaluation of spinal canal and dural sac before and after surgical decompression of lumbar stenosis.
    Rapała K; Chaberek S; Truszczyńska A; Łukawski S; Walczak P
    Ortop Traumatol Rehabil; 2010; 12(2):120-35. PubMed ID: 20453251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Increased Facet Fluid Predicts Dynamic Changes in the Dural Sac Size on Axial-Loaded MRI in Patients with Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis.
    Kanno H; Ozawa H; Koizumi Y; Morozumi N; Aizawa T; Itoi E
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2016 Apr; 37(4):730-5. PubMed ID: 26564439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Indirect Decompression on MRI Chronologically Progresses After Immediate Postlateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: The Results From a Minimum of 2 Years Follow-Up.
    Nakashima H; Kanemura T; Satake K; Ishikawa Y; Ouchida J; Segi N; Yamaguchi H; Imagama S
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Dec; 44(24):E1411-E1418. PubMed ID: 31365515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Computed tomography findings 4 years after surgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis. No correlation with clinical outcome.
    Herno A; Airaksinen O; Saari T; Pitkänen M; Manninen H; Suomalainen O
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1999 Nov; 24(21):2234-9. PubMed ID: 10562990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical significance of redundant nerve roots in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis undergoing oblique lumbar interbody fusion combined with percutaneous internal fixation.
    Sun H; Xiong S; Zhang Y; Zhao Q; Wu Z; Xiao L
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2023 Dec; 18(1):958. PubMed ID: 38087350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Study of dural sac cross-sectional area in early and late phases after lumbar decompression surgery.
    Oba H; Takahashi J; Futatsugi T; Mogami Y; Shibata S; Ohji Y; Tanikawa H
    Spine J; 2013 Sep; 13(9):1088-94. PubMed ID: 23850257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The degree of decompressive relief and its relation to clinical outcome in patients undergoing surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Herno A; Saari T; Suomalainen O; Airaksinen O
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1999 May; 24(10):1010-4. PubMed ID: 10332794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The positional magnetic resonance imaging changes in the lumbar spine following insertion of a novel interspinous process distraction device.
    Siddiqui M; Nicol M; Karadimas E; Smith F; Wardlaw D
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Dec; 30(23):2677-82. PubMed ID: 16319754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical and MRI findings in lumbar spinal stenosis: baseline data from the NORDSTEN study.
    Aaen J; Austevoll IM; Hellum C; Storheim K; Myklebust TÅ; Banitalebi H; Anvar M; Brox JI; Weber C; Solberg T; Grundnes O; Brisby H; Indrekvam K; Hermansen E
    Eur Spine J; 2022 Jun; 31(6):1391-1398. PubMed ID: 34797405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Decompression alone or decompression with fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized clinical trial with two-year MRI follow-up.
    Karlsson T; Försth P; Skorpil M; Pazarlis K; Öhagen P; Michaëlsson K; Sandén B
    Bone Joint J; 2022 Dec; 104-B(12):1343-1351. PubMed ID: 36453045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sequential MRI Changes After Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Spondylolisthesis with Mild and Severe Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.
    Takahashi Y; Funao H; Yoshida K; Sasao Y; Nishiyama M; Isogai N; Ishii K
    World Neurosurg; 2021 Aug; 152():e289-e296. PubMed ID: 34062297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.