These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37823614)

  • 1. Life or death: A qualitative examination of mitigating and aggravating evidence presented in capital trials.
    Holleran LB
    Behav Sci Law; 2023; 41(6):463-487. PubMed ID: 37823614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Examining jurors' ability to meet the constitutional requirement of narrowing in capital sentencing.
    Holleran LB; Vaughan TJ
    Behav Sci Law; 2020 Jul; 38(4):317-336. PubMed ID: 32291823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Revisiting the Decision of Death in Hurst v. Florida.
    Cooke BK; Ginory A; Zedalis J
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2016 Dec; 44(4):483-490. PubMed ID: 28003393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Capital jury deliberation: effects on death sentencing, comprehension, and discrimination.
    Lynch M; Haney C
    Law Hum Behav; 2009 Dec; 33(6):481-96. PubMed ID: 19333746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Arbitrariness and the death penalty: how the defendant's appearance during trial influences capital jurors' punishment decision.
    Antonio ME
    Behav Sci Law; 2006; 24(2):215-34. PubMed ID: 16557640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Expert testimony in capital sentencing: juror responses.
    Montgomery JH; Ciccone JR; Garvey SP; Eisenberg T
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2005; 33(4):509-18. PubMed ID: 16394228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. When domestic goes capital: Juror decision making in capital murder trials involving domestic homicide.
    Richards TN; Smith MD; Fogel SJ; Bjerregaard B
    Law Hum Behav; 2015 Aug; 39(4):402-15. PubMed ID: 25844513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Juror Decision-making in Death Penalty Sentencing when Presented with Defendant's History of Child Abuse or Neglect.
    Bell Holleran LL; Vaughan TJ; Vandiver DM
    Behav Sci Law; 2016 Nov; 34(6):742-766. PubMed ID: 28098410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Discrimination and instructional comprehension: guided discretion, racial bias, and the death penalty.
    Lynch M; Haney C
    Law Hum Behav; 2000 Jun; 24(3):337-58. PubMed ID: 10846376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reducing racial bias in the penalty phase of capital trials.
    Shaked-Schroer N; Costanzo M; Marcus-Newhall A
    Behav Sci Law; 2008; 26(5):603-17. PubMed ID: 18788078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Commentary: Pursuing justice in death penalty trials.
    Watson C; Eth S; Leong GB
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2012; 40(1):50-4. PubMed ID: 22396341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of neuroimaging evidence on mock juror decision making.
    Greene E; Cahill BS
    Behav Sci Law; 2012; 30(3):280-96. PubMed ID: 22213023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Race and jurors' receptivity to mitigation in capital cases: the effect of jurors', defendants', and victims' race in combination.
    Brewer TW
    Law Hum Behav; 2004 Oct; 28(5):529-45. PubMed ID: 15638208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An examination of the effects of mental disorders as mitigating factors on capital sentencing outcomes.
    Miley LN; Heiss-Moses E; Cochran JK; Heide KM; Fogel SJ; Smith MD; Bejerregaard BJ
    Behav Sci Law; 2020 Jul; 38(4):381-405. PubMed ID: 32738090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Nature, nurture, and capital punishment: How evidence of a genetic-environment interaction, future dangerousness, and deliberation affect sentencing decisions.
    Gordon N; Greene E
    Behav Sci Law; 2018 Jan; 36(1):65-83. PubMed ID: 28881042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Victim Impact Statements: How Victim Social Class Affects Juror Decision Making.
    Schweitzer K; Nuñez N
    Violence Vict; 2017 Jun; 32(3):521-532. PubMed ID: 28516855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Possibility of death sentence has divergent effect on verdicts for Black and White defendants.
    Glaser J; Martin KD; Kahn KB
    Law Hum Behav; 2015 Dec; 39(6):539-46. PubMed ID: 26146816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Death Penalty Decisions: Instruction Comprehension, Attitudes, and Decision Mediators.
    Patry MW; Penrod SD
    J Forensic Psychol Pract; 2013 Jan; 13(3):204-244. PubMed ID: 24072981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In the public interest: intellectual disability, the Supreme Court, and the death penalty.
    Abeles N
    Am Psychol; 2010 Nov; 65(8):743-8. PubMed ID: 21058775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A propensity score matching analysis of the relationship between victim sex and capital juror decision-making in North Carolina.
    Jennings WG; Richards TN; Smith MD; Bjerregaard B; Fogel SJ
    Soc Sci Res; 2015 Jul; 52():47-58. PubMed ID: 26004447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.