These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37823779)
1. Explainable machine learning reveals the relationship between hearing thresholds and speech-in-noise recognition in listeners with normal audiograms. Balan JR; Rodrigo H; Saxena U; Mishra SK J Acoust Soc Am; 2023 Oct; 154(4):2278-2288. PubMed ID: 37823779 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Extended High-frequency Hearing Impairment Despite a Normal Audiogram: Relation to Early Aging, Speech-in-noise Perception, Cochlear Function, and Routine Earphone Use. Mishra SK; Saxena U; Rodrigo H Ear Hear; 2022; 43(3):822-835. PubMed ID: 34700326 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Objective Prediction of Hearing Aid Benefit Across Listener Groups Using Machine Learning: Speech Recognition Performance With Binaural Noise-Reduction Algorithms. Schädler MR; Warzybok A; Kollmeier B Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518768954. PubMed ID: 29692200 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Speech-in-speech listening on the LiSN-S test by older adults with good audiograms depends on cognition and hearing acuity at high frequencies. Besser J; Festen JM; Goverts ST; Kramer SE; Pichora-Fuller MK Ear Hear; 2015 Jan; 36(1):24-41. PubMed ID: 25207850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The relationship between high-frequency pure-tone hearing loss, hearing in noise test (HINT) thresholds, and the articulation index. Vermiglio AJ; Soli SD; Freed DJ; Fisher LM J Am Acad Audiol; 2012; 23(10):779-88. PubMed ID: 23169195 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Auditory models of suprathreshold distortion and speech intelligibility in persons with impaired hearing. Bernstein JG; Summers V; Grassi E; Grant KW J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):307-28. PubMed ID: 23636211 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. How much individualization is required to predict the individual effect of suprathreshold processing deficits? Assessing Plomp's distortion component with psychoacoustic detection thresholds and FADE. Hülsmeier D; Kollmeier B Hear Res; 2022 Dec; 426():108609. PubMed ID: 36209657 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Hearing Impairment in the Extended High Frequencies in Children Despite Clinically Normal Hearing. Mishra SK; Saxena U; Rodrigo H Ear Hear; 2022 Nov-Dec 01; 43(6):1653-1660. PubMed ID: 35470812 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A model of speech recognition for hearing-impaired listeners based on deep learning. Roßbach J; Kollmeier B; Meyer BT J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 Mar; 151(3):1417. PubMed ID: 35364918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Spectrotemporal Modulation Sensitivity as a Predictor of Speech-Reception Performance in Noise With Hearing Aids. Bernstein JG; Danielsson H; Hällgren M; Stenfelt S; Rönnberg J; Lunner T Trends Hear; 2016 Nov; 20():. PubMed ID: 27815546 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Suprathreshold auditory processes in listeners with normal audiograms but extended high-frequency hearing lossa). Mishra SK; Fu QJ; Galvin JJ; Galindo A J Acoust Soc Am; 2023 May; 153(5):2745. PubMed ID: 37133816 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss. Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Speech reception in quiet and in noisy conditions by individuals with noise-induced hearing loss in relation to their tone audiogram. Smoorenburg GF J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Jan; 91(1):421-37. PubMed ID: 1737889 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Abnormal intelligibility of speech in competing speech and in noise in a frequency region where audiometric thresholds are near-normal for hearing-impaired listeners. Léger AC; Ives DT; Lorenzi C Hear Res; 2014 Oct; 316():102-9. PubMed ID: 25124152 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparing Binaural Pre-processing Strategies III: Speech Intelligibility of Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners. Völker C; Warzybok A; Ernst SM Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The influence of age, hearing, and working memory on the speech comprehension benefit derived from an automatic speech recognition system. Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Kessens JM; Vlaming MS; Houtgast T Ear Hear; 2009 Apr; 30(2):262-72. PubMed ID: 19194286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cochlear implantation with hearing preservation yields significant benefit for speech recognition in complex listening environments. Gifford RH; Dorman MF; Skarzynski H; Lorens A; Polak M; Driscoll CL; Roland P; Buchman CA Ear Hear; 2013; 34(4):413-25. PubMed ID: 23446225 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical experience with the words-in-noise test on 3430 veterans: comparisons with pure-tone thresholds and word recognition in quiet. Wilson RH J Am Acad Audiol; 2011; 22(7):405-23. PubMed ID: 21993048 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Individual Aided Speech-Recognition Performance and Predictions of Benefit for Listeners With Impaired Hearing Employing FADE. Schädler MR; Hülsmeier D; Warzybok A; Kollmeier B Trends Hear; 2020; 24():2331216520938929. PubMed ID: 32924797 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]