156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37824834)
1. Genotyping MUltiplexed-Sequencing of CRISPR-Localized Editing (GMUSCLE): An Experimental and Computational Approach for Analyzing CRISPR-Edited Cells.
Zhang P; Abel L; Casanova JL; Yang R
CRISPR J; 2023 Oct; 6(5):462-472. PubMed ID: 37824834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A simple and effective genotyping workflow for rapid detection of CRISPR genome editing.
Wang L; Wang J; Feng D; Wang B; Jahan-Mihan Y; Wang Y; Bi Y; Lim D; Ji B
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol; 2024 Apr; 326(4):G473-G481. PubMed ID: 38410866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. CRISPR-Cas9-Edited Site Sequencing (CRES-Seq): An Efficient and High-Throughput Method for the Selection of CRISPR-Cas9-Edited Clones.
Veeranagouda Y; Debono-Lagneaux D; Fournet H; Thill G; Didier M
Curr Protoc Mol Biol; 2018 Jan; 121():31.14.1-31.14.11. PubMed ID: 29337372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Challenges of in vitro genome editing with CRISPR/Cas9 and possible solutions: A review.
Ebrahimi V; Hashemi A
Gene; 2020 Aug; 753():144813. PubMed ID: 32470504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Efficient Editing of the Nuclear
Guzmán-Zapata D; Sandoval-Vargas JM; Macedo-Osorio KS; Salgado-Manjarrez E; Castrejón-Flores JL; Oliver-Salvador MDC; Durán-Figueroa NV; Nogué F; Badillo-Corona JA
Int J Mol Sci; 2019 Mar; 20(5):. PubMed ID: 30871076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Correction to:
CRISPR J; 2023 Dec; 6(6):584. PubMed ID: 37943514
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. CRISPR/Cas9-Based Genome Editing of Transcription Factor Genes in Marchantia polymorpha.
Sugano SS; Nishihama R
Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1830():109-126. PubMed ID: 30043367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Combinational Use of CRISPR/Cas9 and Targeted Toxin Technology Enables Efficient Isolation of Bi-Allelic Knockout Non-Human Mammalian Clones.
Watanabe S; Sakurai T; Nakamura S; Miyoshi K; Sato M
Int J Mol Sci; 2018 Apr; 19(4):. PubMed ID: 29617297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Genome-wide investigation of multiplexed CRISPR-Cas12a-mediated editing in rice.
Zhang Y; Wu Y; Li G; Qi A; Zhang Y; Zhang T; Qi Y
Plant Genome; 2023 Jun; 16(2):e20266. PubMed ID: 36177842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Simple and reliable detection of CRISPR-induced on-target effects by qgPCR and SNP genotyping.
Weisheit I; Kroeger JA; Malik R; Wefers B; Lichtner P; Wurst W; Dichgans M; Paquet D
Nat Protoc; 2021 Mar; 16(3):1714-1739. PubMed ID: 33597771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. High efficient multisites genome editing in allotetraploid cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) using CRISPR/Cas9 system.
Wang P; Zhang J; Sun L; Ma Y; Xu J; Liang S; Deng J; Tan J; Zhang Q; Tu L; Daniell H; Jin S; Zhang X
Plant Biotechnol J; 2018 Jan; 16(1):137-150. PubMed ID: 28499063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Generation of Genome-Edited Mice by Cytoplasmic Injection of CRISPR-Cas9 RNA.
Horii T; Hatada I
Methods Mol Biol; 2023; 2637():75-86. PubMed ID: 36773139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Off- and on-target effects of genome editing in mouse embryos.
Ayabe S; Nakashima K; Yoshiki A
J Reprod Dev; 2019 Feb; 65(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 30518723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A stable DNA-free screening system for CRISPR/RNPs-mediated gene editing in hot and sweet cultivars of Capsicum annuum.
Kim H; Choi J; Won KH
BMC Plant Biol; 2020 Oct; 20(1):449. PubMed ID: 33004008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Maximizing CRISPR/Cas9 phenotype penetrance applying predictive modeling of editing outcomes in Xenopus and zebrafish embryos.
Naert T; Tulkens D; Edwards NA; Carron M; Shaidani NI; Wlizla M; Boel A; Demuynck S; Horb ME; Coucke P; Willaert A; Zorn AM; Vleminckx K
Sci Rep; 2020 Sep; 10(1):14662. PubMed ID: 32887910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Unbiased investigation of specificities of prime editing systems in human cells.
Kim DY; Moon SB; Ko JH; Kim YS; Kim D
Nucleic Acids Res; 2020 Oct; 48(18):10576-10589. PubMed ID: 32941652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Genome Editing by CRISPR/Cas9 in Sorghum Through Biolistic Bombardment.
Liu G; Li J; Godwin ID
Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 1931():169-183. PubMed ID: 30652290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Highly Multiplexed Analysis of CRISPR Genome Editing Outcomes in Mammalian Cells.
Ishiguro S; Yachie N
Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2312():193-223. PubMed ID: 34228292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. FokI-dCas9 mediates high-fidelity genome editing in pigs.
Fisicaro N; Salvaris EJ; Philip GK; Wakefield MJ; Nottle MB; Hawthorne WJ; Cowan PJ
Xenotransplantation; 2020 Jan; 27(1):e12551. PubMed ID: 31407391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Doxycycline-Dependent Self-Inactivation of CRISPR-Cas9 to Temporally Regulate On- and Off-Target Editing.
Kelkar A; Zhu Y; Groth T; Stolfa G; Stablewski AB; Singhi N; Nemeth M; Neelamegham S
Mol Ther; 2020 Jan; 28(1):29-41. PubMed ID: 31601489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
