These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
7. Acoustic Characteristics of Voice Before and After Endoscopic Partial Laryngectomy in Early Glottic Cancer. Chotigavanich C; Dowdall JR; Franco RA J Voice; 2016 May; 30(3):371-6. PubMed ID: 26846542 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Acoustic Analysis Before and After Voice Therapy for Laryngeal Pathology. Chhetri SS; Gautam R Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ); 2015; 13(52):323-7. PubMed ID: 27423282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [EGG and acoustic test for the diagnosis of laryngeal diseases]. Wang J; Gao X; Wang J; Chen F; Yang Y; Hu Y Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2004 Dec; 18(12):740-2. PubMed ID: 15831048 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Characteristics of speech production in patients with T1 glottic cancer who underwent laser cordectomy or radiotherapy. Hong YT; Park MJ; Hong KH Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2018 Oct; 43(3):120-128. PubMed ID: 28975857 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Vocal shimmer in sustained phonation of normal and pathologic voice. Kitajima K; Gould WJ Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1976; 85(3 pt 1):377-81. PubMed ID: 937963 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Application of voice acoustic analysis of surgical effect in children with benign hyperplastic vocal cord disease]. Zhou HY; Li YN; Xu G; Cao J Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Jul; 31(13):1003-1005. PubMed ID: 29798163 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Acoustic analysis of pathological voices. A voice analysis system for the screening of laryngeal diseases. Boyanov B; Hadjitodorov S IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag; 1997; 16(4):74-82. PubMed ID: 9241523 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. An acoustic analysis of the effects of surgical therapy on voice quality. Berke GS; Gerratt BR; Hanson DG Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1983 Oct; 91(5):502-8. PubMed ID: 6417598 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. EGG and acoustic analyses of different voice samples: comparison between perceptual evaluation and voice activity and participation profile. Kankare E; Liu D; Laukkanen AM; Geneid A Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2013; 65(2):98-104. PubMed ID: 24157653 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of Acoustic Analysis Measurements in the Evaluation of Patients With Different Laryngeal Diagnoses. Lopes LW; Batista Simões L; Delfino da Silva J; da Silva Evangelista D; da Nóbrega E Ugulino AC; Oliveira Costa Silva P; Jefferson Dias Vieira V J Voice; 2017 May; 31(3):382.e15-382.e26. PubMed ID: 27742492 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Acoustic discrimination of pathological voice: sustained vowels versus continuous speech. Parsa V; Jamieson DG J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2001 Apr; 44(2):327-39. PubMed ID: 11324655 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Objective evaluation of the quality of voice following radiation therapy for T1 glottic cancer. Aref A; Dworkin J; Devi S; Denton L; Fontanesi J Radiother Oncol; 1997 Nov; 45(2):149-53. PubMed ID: 9424005 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Hierarchical Classification and System Combination for Automatically Identifying Physiological and Neuromuscular Laryngeal Pathologies. Cordeiro H; Fonseca J; Guimarães I; Meneses C J Voice; 2017 May; 31(3):384.e9-384.e14. PubMed ID: 27743845 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]