121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37826970)
1. Estimation of the biomechanical mammographic deformation of the breast using machine learning models.
Said S; Yang Z; Clauser P; Ruiter NV; Baltzer PAT; Hopp T
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2023 Dec; 110():106117. PubMed ID: 37826970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A step-by-step review on patient-specific biomechanical finite element models for breast MRI to x-ray mammography registration.
García E; Diez Y; Diaz O; Lladó X; Martí R; Martí J; Oliver A
Med Phys; 2018 Jan; 45(1):e6-e31. PubMed ID: 29148579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Simulation of mammographic breast compression in 3D MR images using ICP-based B-spline deformation for multimodality breast cancer diagnosis.
Krüger J; Ehrhardt J; Bischof A; Handels H
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2014 May; 9(3):367-77. PubMed ID: 24430800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A finite element-based machine learning approach for modeling the mechanical behavior of the breast tissues under compression in real-time.
Martínez-Martínez F; Rupérez-Moreno MJ; Martínez-Sober M; Solves-Llorens JA; Lorente D; Serrano-López AJ; Martínez-Sanchis S; Monserrat C; Martín-Guerrero JD
Comput Biol Med; 2017 Nov; 90():116-124. PubMed ID: 28982035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Computational simulation of breast compression based on segmented breast and fibroglandular tissues on magnetic resonance images.
Shih TC; Chen JH; Liu D; Nie K; Sun L; Lin M; Chang D; Nalcioglu O; Su MY
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Jul; 55(14):4153-68. PubMed ID: 20601773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. MRI to X-ray mammography intensity-based registration with simultaneous optimisation of pose and biomechanical transformation parameters.
Mertzanidou T; Hipwell J; Johnsen S; Han L; Eiben B; Taylor Z; Ourselin S; Huisman H; Mann R; Bick U; Karssemeijer N; Hawkes D
Med Image Anal; 2014 May; 18(4):674-83. PubMed ID: 24727358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Breast lesion co-localisation between X-ray and MR images using finite element modelling.
Lee AW; Rajagopal V; Babarenda Gamage TP; Doyle AJ; Nielsen PM; Nash MP
Med Image Anal; 2013 Dec; 17(8):1256-64. PubMed ID: 23860392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Finite-element modeling of compression and gravity on a population of breast phantoms for multimodality imaging simulation.
Sturgeon GM; Kiarashi N; Lo JY; Samei E; Segars WP
Med Phys; 2016 May; 43(5):2207. PubMed ID: 27147333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A complete software application for automatic registration of x-ray mammography and magnetic resonance images.
Solves-Llorens JA; Rupérez MJ; Monserrat C; Feliu E; García M; Lloret M
Med Phys; 2014 Aug; 41(8):081903. PubMed ID: 25086534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An analysis of the mechanical parameters used for finite element compression of a high-resolution 3D breast phantom.
Hsu CM; Palmeri ML; Segars WP; Veress AI; Dobbins JT
Med Phys; 2011 Oct; 38(10):5756-70. PubMed ID: 21992390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Large breast compressions: observations and evaluation of simulations.
Tanner C; White M; Guarino S; Hall-Craggs MA; Douek M; Hawkes DJ
Med Phys; 2011 Feb; 38(2):682-90. PubMed ID: 21452705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Automatic multimodal 2D/3D breast image registration using biomechanical FEM models and intensity-based optimization.
Hopp T; Dietzel M; Baltzer PA; Kreisel P; Kaiser WA; Gemmeke H; Ruiter NV
Med Image Anal; 2013 Feb; 17(2):209-18. PubMed ID: 23265802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Towards a biomechanical breast model to simulate and investigate breast compression and its effects in mammography and tomosynthesis.
Hertel M; Makvandi R; Kappler S; Nanke R; Bildhauer P; Saalfeld S; Radicke M; Juhre D; Rose G
Phys Med Biol; 2023 Apr; 68(8):. PubMed ID: 36893466
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Development of patient-specific biomechanical models for predicting large breast deformation.
Han L; Hipwell JH; Tanner C; Taylor Z; Mertzanidou T; Cardoso J; Ourselin S; Hawkes DJ
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Jan; 57(2):455-72. PubMed ID: 22173131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Modelling mammographic compression of the breast.
Chung JH; Rajagopal V; Nielsen PM; Nash MP
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2008; 11(Pt 2):758-65. PubMed ID: 18982673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A nonlinear biomechanical model based registration method for aligning prone and supine MR breast images.
Han L; Hipwell JH; Eiben B; Barratt D; Modat M; Ourselin S; Hawkes DJ
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2014 Mar; 33(3):682-94. PubMed ID: 24595342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A biomechanical breast model evaluated with respect to MRI data collected in three different positions.
Mîra A; Carton AK; Muller S; Payan Y
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2018 Dec; 60():191-199. PubMed ID: 30408760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A biomechanical model of mammographic compressions.
Chung JH; Rajagopal V; Nielsen PM; Nash MP
Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2008 Feb; 7(1):43-52. PubMed ID: 17211616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Frictional contact mechanics methods for soft materials: application to tracking breast cancers.
Chung JH; Rajagopal V; Laursen TA; Nielsen PM; Nash MP
J Biomech; 2008; 41(1):69-77. PubMed ID: 17727862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Towards an in-plane methodology to track breast lesions using mammograms and patient-specific finite-element simulations.
Lapuebla-Ferri A; Cegoñino-Banzo J; Jiménez-Mocholí AJ; Del Palomar AP
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Nov; 62(22):8720-8738. PubMed ID: 29091591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
