These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3782712)

  • 1. A comparison of Perkins and Goldmann applanation tonometry.
    Baskett JS; Goen TM; Terry JE
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1986 Nov; 57(11):832-4. PubMed ID: 3782712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intraocular pressure difference in Goldmann applanation tonometry versus Perkins hand-held applanation tonometry in overweight patients.
    dos Santos MG; Makk S; Berghold A; Eckhardt M; Haas A
    Ophthalmology; 1998 Dec; 105(12):2260-3. PubMed ID: 9855157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Measurement of intraocular pressure using the Tono-Pen in comparison with Goldmann applanation tonometry - a clinical study in 100 eyes].
    Deuter CM; Schlote T; Hahn GA; Bende T; Derse M
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2002 Mar; 219(3):138-42. PubMed ID: 11987041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Portable tonometers: a clinical comparison of applanation and indentation devices.
    Chiara GF; Semes LP; Potter JW; Cutter GR; Tucker WR
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1989 Feb; 60(2):105-10. PubMed ID: 2703651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The evaluation of tonometry and self-tonometry with Ocuton tonometers.
    Kóthy P; Nagymihály A; Holló G
    Med Sci Monit; 2003 Jan; 9(1):PI1-4. PubMed ID: 12552251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of the Perkins handheld applanation tonometer in the measurement of intraocular pressure in dogs and cats.
    Andrade SF; Cremonezi T; Zachi CA; Lonchiati CF; Amatuzzi JD; Sakamoto KP; Mello PA
    Vet Ophthalmol; 2009; 12(5):277-84. PubMed ID: 19751486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of intraocular pressure measurements with the XPERT noncontact tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometry.
    Popovich KS; Shields MB
    J Glaucoma; 1997 Feb; 6(1):44-6. PubMed ID: 9075080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of the ICare rebound tonometer with the Goldmann tonometer in a normal population.
    Fernandes P; Díaz-Rey JA; Queirós A; Gonzalez-Meijome JM; Jorge J
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2005 Sep; 25(5):436-40. PubMed ID: 16101950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Intraocular pressure measurements with the Proview self-tonometer in comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry in healthy and glaucomatous eyes].
    Meyer MW; Yevelenko V; Hoy L; Meyer A; Erb C
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2006 Nov; 223(11):899-903. PubMed ID: 17131250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy of the new ICare rebound tonometer vs. other portable tonometers in healthy eyes.
    García-Resúa C; González-Meijome JM; Gilino J; Yebra-Pimentel E
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Feb; 83(2):102-7. PubMed ID: 16501412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Intraocular pressure difference in Goldmann applanation tonometry versus a transpalpebral tonometer TGDc-01"PRA" in glaucoma patients].
    Schlote T; Landenberger H
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2005 Feb; 222(2):123-31. PubMed ID: 15719316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of intraocular pressure measured by non-contact air puff versus Goldmann applanation tonometers in gas-filled vitrectomized eyes.
    Patikulsila D; Taweemankongsab S; Ngamtipakorn S
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2003 May; 86(5):467-72. PubMed ID: 12859105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [The relationship between central corneal thickness and Perkins applanation tonometry in rabbits].
    Luan CS; Chen XM; Deng YP; Wang L; Liu DJ; Cui M; Li J
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2005 Jul; 41(7):642-6. PubMed ID: 16080901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of intraocular pressure measured by Pascal dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry.
    Ku JY; Danesh-Meyer HV; Craig JP; Gamble GD; McGhee CN
    Eye (Lond); 2006 Feb; 20(2):191-8. PubMed ID: 15803173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The pressure phosphene tonometer--a clinical evaluation.
    Chew GS; Sanderson GF; Molteno AC
    Eye (Lond); 2005 Jun; 19(6):683-5. PubMed ID: 15192693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical evaluation of the Keeler PULSAIR 2000 tonometer.
    Pearce CD; Kohl P; Yolton RL
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1992 Feb; 63(2):106-10. PubMed ID: 1583262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Comparison of precision of the TonoPenXL with the Goldmann and Draeger applanation tonometer in a sitting and recumbent position of the patients -- a clinical study on 251 eyes].
    Viestenz A; Lausen B; Jünemann AM; Mardin CY
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2002 Nov; 219(11):785-90. PubMed ID: 12494368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison between standard Goldmann applanation prism and disposable applanation prism in tonometry.
    Goel S; Chua C; Dong B; Butcher M; Ahfat F; Hindi SK; Kotta S
    Eye (Lond); 2004 Feb; 18(2):175-8. PubMed ID: 14762411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reliability of the Nidek NT-1000 non contact tonometer.
    Van de Velde T; Zeyen T
    Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol; 1995; 255():19-22. PubMed ID: 7496571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Two-position measurement of intraocular pressure by PT100 noncontact tonometry in comparison with Goldmann tonometry.
    Ogbuehi KC; Chijuka JC; Osuagwu UL
    Clin Ophthalmol; 2011; 5():1227-34. PubMed ID: 21966192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.