These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 378283)

  • 1. Stress analysis of single-tooth implants. I. Effect of elastic parameters and geometry of implant.
    Atmaram GH; Mohammed H; Schoen FJ
    Biomater Med Devices Artif Organs; 1979; 7(1):99-104. PubMed ID: 378283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Stress analysis of single-tooth implants. II. Effect of implant root-length variation and pseudo-periodontal ligament incorporation.
    Atmaram GH; Mohammed H
    Biomater Med Devices Artif Organs; 1979; 7(1):105-10. PubMed ID: 378281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Stress analysis of single-tooth implants. I. Effect of elastic parameters and geometry of implant.
    Atmaram GH; Mohammed H
    Implantologist; 1983-1984; 3(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 6386667
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bone stress distribution for three endosseous implants.
    Rieger MR; Fareed K; Adams WK; Tanquist RA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1989 Feb; 61(2):223-8. PubMed ID: 2654367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Implant-bone interface characteristics of bioglass dental implants.
    Weinstein AM; Klawitter JJ; Cook SD
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1980 Jan; 14(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 6987233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stress-absorbing elements in dental implants.
    van Rossen IP; Braak LH; de Putter C; de Groot K
    J Prosthet Dent; 1990 Aug; 64(2):198-205. PubMed ID: 2202819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Modification of osseointegrated implants for distal-extension prostheses.
    el Charkawi HG; el Wakad MT; Naser ME
    J Prosthet Dent; 1990 Oct; 64(4):469-72. PubMed ID: 2231458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A parametric finite element analysis study of the stresses in an endosseous implant.
    Lewis G
    Biomed Mater Eng; 1994; 4(7):495-502. PubMed ID: 7881333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Vitreous carbon implants: a five-year study in baboons.
    Schnitman PA; Woolfson MW; Feingold RM; Gettleman L; Freedman HM; Kalis PJ; Buchanan W; Shulman LB
    J Prosthet Dent; 1980 Aug; 44(2):190-200. PubMed ID: 6772766
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Three-dimensional finite element stress analysis in and around the Screw-Vent implant.
    Clelland NL; Ismail YH; Zaki HS; Pipko D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1991; 6(4):391-8. PubMed ID: 1820307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of the stress transfer characteristics of a dental implant with a rigid or a resilient internal element.
    McGlumphy EA; Campagni WV; Peterson LJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 1989 Nov; 62(5):586-93. PubMed ID: 2691664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The relationship between endosteal implant design and function: maximum stress distribution with computer-formed, three dimensional Flexi-Cup blades.
    Valen M
    J Oral Implantol; 1983; 11(1):49-71. PubMed ID: 6368845
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biomechanical effects of a maxillary implant in the augmented sinus: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Huang HL; Fuh LJ; Ko CC; Hsu JT; Chen CC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(3):455-62. PubMed ID: 19587867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Some advances in endosseous implants.
    Lavelle CL; Wedgwood D; Love WB
    J Oral Rehabil; 1981 Jun; 8(4):319-31. PubMed ID: 7024488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Stress analysis of single-tooth implants. III. Effect of elastic modulus and thickness of pseudo periodontal ligament.
    Atmaram GH; Mohammed H
    Implantologist; 1983-1984; 3(1):69-72. PubMed ID: 6386670
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of cortical bone quality on stress distribution in bone around dental implant.
    Kitagawa T; Tanimoto Y; Nemoto K; Aida M
    Dent Mater J; 2005 Jun; 24(2):219-24. PubMed ID: 16022442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The influence of implant geometry on the stress distribution around dental implants.
    Cook SD; Klawitter JJ; Weinstein AM
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1982 Jul; 16(4):369-79. PubMed ID: 7107655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The anchor endosteal implant.
    Cranin AN
    Dent Clin North Am; 1980 Jul; 24(3):505-19. PubMed ID: 6995179
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of stress and strain distribution characteristics of two different rigid implant designs for distal-extension fixed prostheses.
    Akpinar I; Demirel F; Parnas L; Sahin S
    Quintessence Int; 1996 Jan; 27(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 9063207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Influence of Bone Quality on the Biomechanical Behavior of a Tooth-Implant Fixed Partial Denture: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.
    Tsouknidas A; Giannopoulos D; Savvakis S; Michailidis N; Lympoudi E; Fytanidis D; Pissiotis A; Michalakis K
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(6):e143-e154. PubMed ID: 27861651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.