These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37828457)

  • 21. How Did Coronavirus-19 Impact the Expenses for Medical Students Applying to an Orthopaedic Surgery Residency in 2020 to 2021?
    Gordon AM; Conway CA; Sheth BK; Magruder ML; Vakharia RM; Levine WN; Razi AE
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2022 Mar; 480(3):443-451. PubMed ID: 34913886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The effects of the change in the NRMP matching algorithm. National Resident Matching Program.
    Roth AE; Peranson E
    JAMA; 1997 Sep; 278(9):729-32. PubMed ID: 9286832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Applicant Characteristics Associated With Selection for Ranking at Independent Surgery Residency Programs.
    Dort JM; Trickey AW; Kallies KJ; Joshi AR; Sidwell RA; Jarman BT
    J Surg Educ; 2015; 72(6):e123-9. PubMed ID: 26073713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The "Independent" Plastic Surgery Match: Analysis of Changes in Recent Years and Applicant Preferences.
    Hammoudeh ZS; Mostafa G; Saint-Cyr M; Bakri K; Mardini S
    J Surg Educ; 2016; 73(6):1039-1045. PubMed ID: 27886967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Virtual Interactions and the 2020-2021 Residency Application Cycle in General Surgery: A Look Ahead.
    DeLay TK; Singh NP; Duong TA; Rais-Bahrami S; King TW; Chen H; Corey BL
    J Surg Res; 2022 Oct; 278():331-336. PubMed ID: 35659708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Local Culture and Community Through a Digital Lens: Viewpoint on Designing and Implementing a Virtual Second Look Event for Residency Applicants.
    Martindale JM; Carrasquillo RA; Otallah SI; Brooks AK; Denizard-Thompson N; Pharr E; Choate N; Sokolosky M; Strauss LD
    JMIR Med Educ; 2023 Sep; 9():e44240. PubMed ID: 37695665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Virtual interviewing in the MedPhys match: Experiences of applicants and programs.
    Juang T; Landers A; Rodrigues AE; Schubert L; Hendrickson KRG
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2023 Jun; 24(6):e14007. PubMed ID: 37118926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Trends in Post-Interview Communication Practices.
    Harvey RS; Kovatch KJ; Prince MEP; Malloy KM; Thorne MC
    Laryngoscope; 2019 Mar; 129(3):607-612. PubMed ID: 30247746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A Survey of Vascular Surgery Program Directors: Perspectives following USMLE Step 1 Conversion to Pass/Fail and Virtual Only Interviews.
    Fan RR; Aziz F; Wittgen CM; Williams MS; Smeds MR
    Ann Vasc Surg; 2023 Jan; 88():32-41. PubMed ID: 36179944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Current Applicant Perceptions of the Ophthalmology Residency Match.
    Venincasa MJ; Cai LZ; Gedde SJ; Uhler T; Sridhar J
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2020 May; 138(5):460-466. PubMed ID: 32163107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A Canadian survey of residency applicants' and interviewers' perceptions of the 2021 CaRMS R1 virtual interviews.
    Del Fernandes R; Relke N; Soleas E; Braund H; Lui CJPM; Zevin B
    BMC Med Educ; 2023 May; 23(1):392. PubMed ID: 37248475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Integrity of the National Resident Matching Program for Radiation Oncology: National Survey of Applicant Experiences.
    Holliday EB; Thomas CR; Kusano AS
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2015 Jul; 92(3):525-31. PubMed ID: 25936811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The MedPhys match survey: Search criteria and advice for programs and applicants.
    Hendrickson KRG; Juang T; Rodrigues AE; Burmeister JW
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2021 May; 22(5):150-167. PubMed ID: 33786983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Integrated plastic surgery residency applicant survey: characteristics of successful applicants and feedback about the interview process.
    Rogers CR; Gutowski KA; Rio AM; Larson DL; Edwards M; Hansen JE; Lawrence WT; Stevenson TR; Bentz ML
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2009 May; 123(5):1607-1617. PubMed ID: 19407635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The integrity of the dermatology National Resident Matching Program: results of a national study.
    Sbicca JA; Gorell ES; Kanzler MH; Lane AT
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2010 Oct; 63(4):594-601. PubMed ID: 20599295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Integrated vascular surgery applicants' perspectives of virtual residency interviews during the coronavirus disease 2019 application cycle.
    Coluccio M; Shridhar N; Liang T; Harris L
    J Vasc Surg; 2023 Feb; 77(2):634-639.e2. PubMed ID: 36150637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Emergency Medicine Residency Applicants' Perceptions about Being Contacted after Interview Day.
    Yarris LM; Deiorio NM; Gaines SS
    West J Emerg Med; 2010 Dec; 11(5):474-8. PubMed ID: 21293769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Association of Mentor-to-Program Contact and Applicant Rank Disclosure With Vitreoretinal Fellowship Applicant's Final Match Outcome in 2016 and 2017.
    Christiansen SM; Osher JM; Riemann CD
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2018 Jun; 136(6):642-647. PubMed ID: 29710103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Financial burden associated with the residency match in neurological surgery.
    Agarwal N; Choi PA; Okonkwo DO; Barrow DL; Friedlander RM
    J Neurosurg; 2017 Jan; 126(1):184-190. PubMed ID: 27058197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.