These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37828523)

  • 1. Letter in response to: "The importance of clinical importance when determining the target difference in sample size calculations".
    Wong H
    Trials; 2023 Oct; 24(1):666. PubMed ID: 37828523
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The importance of clinical importance when determining the target difference in sample size calculations.
    Parker RA; Cook JA
    Trials; 2023 Aug; 24(1):495. PubMed ID: 37542276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Response to Letter from Wong on determining the target difference in sample size calculations for randomised controlled trials.
    Cook JA; Parker RA
    Trials; 2024 Mar; 25(1):161. PubMed ID: 38431609
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Randomized controlled trials 5: Determining the sample size and power for clinical trials and cohort studies.
    Greene T
    Methods Mol Biol; 2015; 1281():225-47. PubMed ID: 25694313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Minimum important difference is minimally important in sample size calculations.
    Wong H
    Trials; 2023 Jan; 24(1):34. PubMed ID: 36650587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The difference between statistical significance and clinical relevance. The case of minimal important change, non-inferiority trials, and smallest worthwhile effect.
    Willigenburg NW; Poolman RW
    Injury; 2023 Oct; 54 Suppl 5():110764. PubMed ID: 37923502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How many patients do we need for a clinical trial? Demystifying sample size calculations.
    Kelly PJ; Webster AC; Craig JC
    Nephrology (Carlton); 2010 Dec; 15(8):725-31. PubMed ID: 21175958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Editorial Commentary: Illuminating the Fragility of Nonsignificant Trials in Sports Medicine.
    Dilisio MF
    Arthroscopy; 2023 Sep; 39(9):2084-2085. PubMed ID: 37543391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Randomized Controlled Trials 6: Determining the Sample Size and Power for Clinical Trials and Cohort Studies.
    Greene T
    Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2249():281-305. PubMed ID: 33871850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sample size calculations for randomized clinical trials published in anesthesiology journals: a comparison of 2010 versus 2016.
    Chow JTY; Turkstra TP; Yim E; Jones PM
    Can J Anaesth; 2018 Jun; 65(6):611-618. PubMed ID: 29569142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sample size calculations: basic principles and common pitfalls.
    Noordzij M; Tripepi G; Dekker FW; Zoccali C; Tanck MW; Jager KJ
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2010 May; 25(5):1388-93. PubMed ID: 20067907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Considerations on sample size and power calculations in randomized clinical trials.
    Karlsson J; Engebretsen L; Dainty K;
    Arthroscopy; 2003 Nov; 19(9):997-9. PubMed ID: 14608320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How I do it: sample size calculations.
    O'Hara J
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2008 Apr; 33(2):145-9. PubMed ID: 18429871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sample size estimation for clinicians.
    Archibald CP; Lee HP
    Ann Acad Med Singap; 1995 Mar; 24(2):328-32. PubMed ID: 7653981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A method to enhance determining the clinical relevance of periodontal research data: number needed to treat (NNT).
    Greenstein G; Nunn ME
    J Periodontol; 2004 Apr; 75(4):620-4. PubMed ID: 15152829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biostatistics for gastroenterologists. Part II ΜΆ Rethinking sample size.
    Stallings E
    Rev Esp Enferm Dig; 2023 Aug; 115(8):411-413. PubMed ID: 37366033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Letter to the editor: "Clinical significance of micronutrient supplements in patients with coronavirus disease 2019: A comprehensive systematic review and meta-Analysis".
    Graaff R; Eggersdorfer ML
    Clin Nutr ESPEN; 2023 Feb; 53():274. PubMed ID: 36657924
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sample size calculations in high-profile surgical trials that use patient-reported outcome measures: systematic review.
    Jacklin C; Rodrigues JN; Collins J; Cook J; Harrison CJ
    Br J Surg; 2022 Feb; 109(2):178-181. PubMed ID: 34915565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sample-size calculations for studies with correlated ordinal outcomes.
    Kim HY; Williamson JM; Lyles CM
    Stat Med; 2005 Oct; 24(19):2977-87. PubMed ID: 16149125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sample size calculations in surgery: are they done correctly?
    Maggard MA; O'Connell JB; Liu JH; Etzioni DA; Ko CY
    Surgery; 2003 Aug; 134(2):275-9. PubMed ID: 12947329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.