144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37828812)
1. Instrumental variable analysis for cost outcome: Application to the effect of primary care visit on medical cost among low-income adults.
Gao D; Hu J; Bradley CJ; Yang F
Stat Med; 2023 Oct; 42(24):4349-4376. PubMed ID: 37828812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bias in estimating the causal hazard ratio when using two-stage instrumental variable methods.
Wan F; Small D; Bekelman JE; Mitra N
Stat Med; 2015 Jun; 34(14):2235-65. PubMed ID: 25800789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Instrumental variable approach for estimating a causal hazard ratio: application to the effect of postmastectomy radiotherapy on breast cancer patients.
Yang F; Cheng J; Huo D
Obs Stud; 2019; 5():141-162. PubMed ID: 34223564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Two-stage instrumental variable methods for estimating the causal odds ratio: analysis of bias.
Cai B; Small DS; Have TR
Stat Med; 2011 Jul; 30(15):1809-24. PubMed ID: 21495062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A general approach to evaluating the bias of 2-stage instrumental variable estimators.
Wan F; Small D; Mitra N
Stat Med; 2018 May; 37(12):1997-2015. PubMed ID: 29572890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Simulation study of instrumental variable approaches with an application to a study of the antidiabetic effect of bezafibrate.
Cai B; Hennessy S; Flory JH; Sha D; Ten Have TR; Small DS
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2012 May; 21 Suppl 2():114-20. PubMed ID: 22552986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Analysis approaches to address treatment nonadherence in pragmatic trials with point-treatment settings: a simulation study.
Hossain MB; Mosquera L; Karim ME
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Feb; 22(1):46. PubMed ID: 35172746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparing the performance of two-stage residual inclusion methods when using physician's prescribing preference as an instrumental variable: unmeasured confounding and noncollapsibility.
Zhang L; Lewsey J
J Comp Eff Res; 2024 May; 13(5):e230085. PubMed ID: 38567965
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Profiling compliers and noncompliers for instrumental variable analysis with covariates: A weighting approach.
Choi BY
PLoS One; 2023; 18(6):e0283223. PubMed ID: 37319247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A novel Mendelian randomization method with binary risk factor and outcome.
Allman PH; Aban I; Long DM; Bridges SL; Srinivasasainagendra V; MacKenzie T; Cutter G; Tiwari HK
Genet Epidemiol; 2021 Jul; 45(5):549-560. PubMed ID: 33998053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Instrumental variable methods for a binary outcome were used to informatively address noncompliance in a randomized trial in surgery.
Cook JA; MacLennan GS; Palmer T; Lois N; Emsley R
J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Apr; 96():126-132. PubMed ID: 29157924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Two-stage residual inclusion for survival data and competing risks-An instrumental variable approach with application to SEER-Medicare linked data.
Ying A; Xu R; Murphy J
Stat Med; 2019 May; 38(10):1775-1801. PubMed ID: 30586680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Instrumental variable estimation of the causal hazard ratio.
Wang L; Tchetgen Tchetgen E; Martinussen T; Vansteelandt S
Biometrics; 2023 Jun; 79(2):539-550. PubMed ID: 36377509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Unifying instrumental variable and inverse probability weighting approaches for inference of causal treatment effect and unmeasured confounding in observational studies.
Liu T; Hogan JW
Stat Methods Med Res; 2021 Mar; 30(3):671-686. PubMed ID: 33213292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of instrumental variable methods with continuous exposure and binary outcome: A simulation study.
Orihara S; Goto A
J Epidemiol; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38644194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Doubly robust nonparametric instrumental variable estimators for survival outcomes.
Lee Y; Kennedy EH; Mitra N
Biostatistics; 2023 Apr; 24(2):518-537. PubMed ID: 34676400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Treatment Effect Estimation Using Nonlinear Two-Stage Instrumental Variable Estimators: Another Cautionary Note.
Chapman CG; Brooks JM
Health Serv Res; 2016 Dec; 51(6):2375-2394. PubMed ID: 26891780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Instrumental variable estimation of truncated local average treatment effects.
Choi BY
PLoS One; 2021; 16(4):e0249642. PubMed ID: 33819276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The productivity of mental health care: an instrumental variable approach.
Lu M
J Ment Health Policy Econ; 1999 Jun; 2(2):59-71. PubMed ID: 11967410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
