These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37828812)

  • 41. Instrumental variable analysis to estimate treatment effects: a simulation study showing potential benefits of conditioning on hospital.
    Ceyisakar IE; van Leeuwen N; Steyerberg EW; Lingsma HF
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Apr; 22(1):121. PubMed ID: 35468748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. On a preference-based instrumental variable approach in reducing unmeasured confounding-by-indication.
    Li Y; Lee Y; Wolfe RA; Morgenstern H; Zhang J; Port FK; Robinson BM
    Stat Med; 2015 Mar; 34(7):1150-68. PubMed ID: 25546152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Instrumental variable based estimation under the semiparametric accelerated failure time model.
    Huling JD; Yu M; O'Malley AJ
    Biometrics; 2019 Jun; 75(2):516-527. PubMed ID: 30357822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. [Challenges and factors that influencing causal inference and interpretation, based on Mendelian randomization studies].
    Wang YZ; Shen HB
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2020 Aug; 41(8):1231-1236. PubMed ID: 32867428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Instruments for causal inference: an epidemiologist's dream?
    Hernán MA; Robins JM
    Epidemiology; 2006 Jul; 17(4):360-72. PubMed ID: 16755261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Bayesian methods for instrumental variable analysis with genetic instruments ('Mendelian randomization'): example with urate transporter SLC2A9 as an instrumental variable for effect of urate levels on metabolic syndrome.
    McKeigue PM; Campbell H; Wild S; Vitart V; Hayward C; Rudan I; Wright AF; Wilson JF
    Int J Epidemiol; 2010 Jun; 39(3):907-18. PubMed ID: 20348110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Too much ado about instrumental variable approach: is the cure worse than the disease?
    Baser O
    Value Health; 2009; 12(8):1201-9. PubMed ID: 19497084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Assessing the impact of unmeasured confounding for binary outcomes using confounding functions.
    Kasza J; Wolfe R; Schuster T
    Int J Epidemiol; 2017 Aug; 46(4):1303-1311. PubMed ID: 28338913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Instrumental variables I: instrumental variables exploit natural variation in nonexperimental data to estimate causal relationships.
    Rassen JA; Brookhart MA; Glynn RJ; Mittleman MA; Schneeweiss S
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Dec; 62(12):1226-32. PubMed ID: 19356901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Mendelian randomization using semiparametric linear transformation models.
    Huang YT
    Stat Med; 2020 Mar; 39(7):890-905. PubMed ID: 31879996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Mediation analysis for count and zero-inflated count data without sequential ignorability and its application in dental studies.
    Guo Z; Small DS; Gansky SA; Cheng J
    J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat; 2018 Feb; 67(2):371-394. PubMed ID: 30983638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. An introduction to instrumental variable assumptions, validation and estimation.
    Lousdal ML
    Emerg Themes Epidemiol; 2018; 15():1. PubMed ID: 29387137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Testing causal effects in observational survival data using propensity score matching design.
    Lu B; Cai D; Tong X
    Stat Med; 2018 May; 37(11):1846-1858. PubMed ID: 29399833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Improving bias and coverage in instrumental variable analysis with weak instruments for continuous and binary outcomes.
    Burgess S; Thompson SG
    Stat Med; 2012 Jul; 31(15):1582-600. PubMed ID: 22374818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Causal inference in paired two-arm experimental studies under noncompliance with application to prognosis of myocardial infarction.
    Bartolucci F; Farcomeni A
    Stat Med; 2013 Nov; 32(25):4348-66. PubMed ID: 23754710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Invited Commentary: Using Financial Credits as Instrumental Variables for Estimating the Causal Relationship Between Income and Health.
    Pega F
    Am J Epidemiol; 2016 May; 183(9):785-9. PubMed ID: 27056959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Two robust tools for inference about causal effects with invalid instruments.
    Kang H; Lee Y; Cai TT; Small DS
    Biometrics; 2022 Mar; 78(1):24-34. PubMed ID: 33616910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The impact of unmeasured within- and between-cluster confounding on the bias of effect estimatorsof a continuous exposure.
    Li Y; Lee Y; Port FK; Robinson BM
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Aug; 29(8):2119-2139. PubMed ID: 31694489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Performance of instrumental variable methods in cohort and nested case-control studies: a simulation study.
    Uddin MJ; Groenwold RH; de Boer A; Belitser SV; Roes KC; Hoes AW; Klungel OH
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2014 Feb; 23(2):165-77. PubMed ID: 24306965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Adjustment for Variable Adherence Under Hierarchical Structure: Instrumental Variable Modeling Through Compound Residual Inclusion.
    Holmes TH; Zulman DM; Kushida CA
    Med Care; 2017 Dec; 55(12):e120-e130. PubMed ID: 29135775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.