These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37830767)

  • 1. A Diffusion Model Analysis of Object-Based Selective Attention in the Eriksen Flanker Task.
    Kelber P; Gierlich M; Göth J; Jeschke MG; Mackenzie IG; Mittelstädt V
    Exp Psychol; 2023 May; 70(3):155-170. PubMed ID: 37830767
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A bimodal extension of the Eriksen flanker task.
    Ulrich R; Prislan L; Miller J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Feb; 83(2):790-799. PubMed ID: 33179215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Flanker tasks based on congruency manipulation are biased measures of selective attention in perceptual load studies.
    Li Z; Lou J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Aug; 81(6):1836-1845. PubMed ID: 30993656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Conflict resolution in the Eriksen flanker task: Similarities and differences to the Simon task.
    Hübner R; Töbel L
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(3):e0214203. PubMed ID: 30921368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Automatic and controlled stimulus processing in conflict tasks: Superimposed diffusion processes and delta functions.
    Ulrich R; Schröter H; Leuthold H; Birngruber T
    Cogn Psychol; 2015 May; 78():148-74. PubMed ID: 25909766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The influence of reward in the Simon task: Differences and similarities to the Stroop and Eriksen flanker tasks.
    Mittelstädt V; Ulrich R; König J; Hofbauer K; Mackenzie IG
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Apr; 85(3):949-959. PubMed ID: 36316615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The role of task-relevant and task-irrelevant information in congruency sequence effects: Applying the diffusion model for conflict tasks.
    Koob V; Mackenzie I; Ulrich R; Leuthold H; Janczyk M
    Cogn Psychol; 2023 Feb; 140():101528. PubMed ID: 36584549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The impact of distractor relevance on the strength and timing of cognitive control: Evidence from delta plots and diffusion model analyses.
    Mittelstädt V; Mackenzie IG; Koob V; Janczyk M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2023 Oct; 49(10):1588-1614. PubMed ID: 37561515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Perceptual grouping of objects occupied by target and flankers affects target-flanker interference.
    Luo C; Proctor RW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Jan; 78(1):251-63. PubMed ID: 26404531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A nonspatial sound modulates processing of visual distractors in a flanker task.
    Salagovic CA; Leonard CJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Feb; 83(2):800-809. PubMed ID: 33083988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evidence for selective target processing with a low perceptual load flankers task.
    Paquet L; Craig GL
    Mem Cognit; 1997 Mar; 25(2):182-9. PubMed ID: 9099070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A diffusion model analysis of the effects of aging in the Flanker Task.
    Servant M; Evans NJ
    Psychol Aging; 2020 Sep; 35(6):831-849. PubMed ID: 32658539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Object-based attention: sensory modulation or priority setting?
    Shomstein S; Yantis S
    Percept Psychophys; 2002 Jan; 64(1):41-51. PubMed ID: 11916301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dynamics of attentional focusing in the Eriksen flanker task.
    Servant M; Logan GD
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Nov; 81(8):2710-2721. PubMed ID: 31250363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Control of Attention in Rhesus Monkeys Measured Using a Flanker Task.
    Hassett TC; Hampton RR
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Oct; 84(7):2155-2166. PubMed ID: 35174464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Conditional accuracy in response interference tasks: Evidence from the Eriksen flanker task and the spatial conflict task.
    Stins JF; Polderman JC; Boomsma DI; de Geus EJ
    Adv Cogn Psychol; 2008 Jul; 3(3):409-17. PubMed ID: 20517524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Conflict-frequency affects flanker interference: role of stimulus-ensemble-specific practiceand flanker-response contingencies.
    Wendt M; Luna-Rodriguez A
    Exp Psychol; 2009; 56(3):206-17. PubMed ID: 19289363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ad-hoc and context-dependent adjustments of selective attention in conflict control: an ERP study with visual probes.
    Nigbur R; Schneider J; Sommer W; Dimigen O; Stürmer B
    Neuroimage; 2015 Feb; 107():76-84. PubMed ID: 25482266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Flanker and negative flanker effects in letter identification.
    Rouder JN; King JW
    Percept Psychophys; 2003 Feb; 65(2):287-97. PubMed ID: 12713244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Goal-driven selective attention in patients with right hemisphere lesions: how intact is the ipsilesional field?
    Snow JC; Mattingley JB
    Brain; 2006 Jan; 129(Pt 1):168-81. PubMed ID: 16317021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.