These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37830894)

  • 1. Erratum: Generalized perceptual adaptation to second-language speech: Variability, similarity, and intelligibility [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 154, 1601-1613 (2023)].
    Bradlow AR; Bassard AM; Paller KA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2023 Oct; 154(4):2289. PubMed ID: 37830894
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A context-based approach to predict speech intelligibility in interrupted noise: Model design.
    van Schoonhoven J; Rhebergen KS; Dreschler WA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 Feb; 151(2):1404. PubMed ID: 35232064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Erratum: Interrupted mosaic speech revisited: Gain and loss in intelligibility by stretching [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 155(3), 1767-1779 (2024)].
    Ueda K; Hashimoto M; Takeichi H; Wakamiya K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2024 May; 155(5):3014. PubMed ID: 38717214
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Envelope and intensity based prediction of psychoacoustic masking and speech intelligibility.
    Biberger T; Ewert SD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Aug; 140(2):1023. PubMed ID: 27586734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Erratum: Re-examining the relationship between number of cochlear implant channels and maximal speech intelligibility [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 142(6), EL537-EL543 (2017)].
    Croghan NBH; Duran SI; Smith ZM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 May; 143(5):2621. PubMed ID: 29857764
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An addendum to "Effects of Noise on Speech Production: Acoustic and Perceptual Analyses" [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 84, 917-928 (1988)].
    Summers WV; Johnson K; Pisoni DB; Bernacki RH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Nov; 86(5):1717-21. PubMed ID: 2808921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluating the role of spectral and envelope characteristics in the intelligibility advantage of clear speech.
    Krause JC; Braida LD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3346-57. PubMed ID: 19425675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Generalized perceptual adaptation to second-language speech: Variability, similarity, and intelligibilitya).
    Bradlow AR; Bassard AM; Paller KA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2023 Sep; 154(3):1601-1613. PubMed ID: 37698438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Speech intelligibility prediction based on modulation frequency-selective processing.
    Relaño-Iborra H; Dau T
    Hear Res; 2022 Dec; 426():108610. PubMed ID: 36163219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The role of short-time intensity and envelope power for speech intelligibility and psychoacoustic masking.
    Biberger T; Ewert SD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Aug; 142(2):1098. PubMed ID: 28863616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comment on "Interaural alternation, information load, and speech intelligibility" (J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 57, 1219-1220 (1975)).
    Speaks C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1976 Jul; 60(1):272-8. PubMed ID: 956532
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perception of final fricative voicing: native and nonnative listeners' use of vowel duration.
    Broersma M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Mar; 127(3):1636-44. PubMed ID: 20329862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Application of an extended equalization-cancellation model to speech intelligibility with spatially distributed maskers.
    Wan R; Durlach NI; Colburn HS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Dec; 128(6):3678-90. PubMed ID: 21218900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of permutations of time samples in the speech waveform on intelligibility.
    Gotoh S; Tohyama M; Houtgast T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jul; 142(1):249. PubMed ID: 28764474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The intensitive DL of tones: dependence of signal/masker ratio on tone level and on spectrum of added noise.
    Greenwood DD
    Hear Res; 1993 Feb; 65(1-2):1-39. PubMed ID: 8458743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Perception of English and Catalan vowels by English and Catalan listeners. Part II. Perceptual vs ecphoric similarity.
    Cebrian J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 Nov; 152(5):2781. PubMed ID: 36456284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of spectro-temporal modulation changes produced by multi-channel compression on intelligibility in a competing-speech task.
    Stone MA; Moore BC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb; 123(2):1063-76. PubMed ID: 18247908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Speech-on-speech masking with variable access to the linguistic content of the masker speech.
    Calandruccio L; Dhar S; Bradlow AR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Aug; 128(2):860-9. PubMed ID: 20707455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of noise suppression on intelligibility. II: An attempt to validate physical metrics.
    Hilkhuysen G; Gaubitch N; Brookes M; Huckvale M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jan; 135(1):439-50. PubMed ID: 24437784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Erratum: Exposure to wind turbine noise: Perceptual responses and reported health effects [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 139(3), 1443-1454 (2016)].
    Michaud DS; Feder K; Keith SE; Voicescu SA; Marro L; Than J; Guay M; Denning A; McGuire D; Bower T; Lavigne E; Murray BJ; Weiss SK; van den Berg F
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Oct; 140(4):2457. PubMed ID: 27794326
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.