BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37832315)

  • 1. Fighting against COVID-19: With or without politics?
    Kovanic M; Steuer M
    Soc Sci Med; 2023 Nov; 337():116297. PubMed ID: 37832315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pandemic politics: Exploring the intersection of state political affiliation and public universities' COVID-19 policies and messaging.
    Mayer M; Looney M; Eicher R; Freihaut R; Vega JL; Talton WJ; Flutie AR; Cook J; Rubenking B
    J Emerg Manag; 2023; 21(5):439-452. PubMed ID: 37932946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. COVID-19 Science Policy, Experts, and Publics: Why Epistemic Democracy Matters in Ecological Crises.
    Boschele M
    OMICS; 2020 Aug; 24(8):479-482. PubMed ID: 32644877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pandemic backsliding: Violations of democratic standards during Covid-19.
    Edgell AB; Lachapelle J; Lührmann A; Maerz SF
    Soc Sci Med; 2021 Sep; 285():114244. PubMed ID: 34399291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The comparative politics of COVID-19: The need to understand government responses.
    Greer SL; King EJ; da Fonseca EM; Peralta-Santos A
    Glob Public Health; 2020 Sep; 15(9):1413-1416. PubMed ID: 32564670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Politicisation, depoliticisation, and repoliticisation of health care controversies: Vaccination and mental health care reform in the Czech Republic.
    Numerato D; Honová PA; Sedláčková T
    Soc Sci Med; 2021 May; 277():113916. PubMed ID: 33878664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. COVID-19 Is a Crisis in Planetary Health and Politics of Expertise: Time to Think Critically and Innovate Both.
    Boschele M
    OMICS; 2021 May; 25(5):279-284. PubMed ID: 33961517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Depoliticising disaster response in a politically saturated context: the case of the 2016-19 droughts in Zimbabwe.
    Desportes I; Moyo-Nyoni N
    Disasters; 2022 Oct; 46(4):1098-1120. PubMed ID: 34625998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Democracy, Capacity, and Coercion in Pandemic Response: COVID-19 in Comparative Political Perspective.
    Kavanagh MM; Singh R
    J Health Polit Policy Law; 2020 Dec; 45(6):997-1012. PubMed ID: 32464665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Depoliticisation, Resilience and the Herceptin Post-Code Lottery Crisis: Holding Back the Tide.
    Wood M
    Br J Polit Int Relat; 2015 Nov; 17(4):644-664. PubMed ID: 27904418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Democratic quality and excess mortality during the COVID-19 pandemic.
    Martín-Martín JJ; Correa M; Rojo-Gallego-Burín AM; Sánchez-Martínez MT; Delgado-Márquez L; Ortega-Almón MÁ
    Sci Rep; 2024 Apr; 14(1):7948. PubMed ID: 38575627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Governments' accountability for Canada's pandemic response.
    Khoury L; Klein A; Couture-Ménard ME; Hammond K
    J Public Health Policy; 2022 Jun; 43(2):222-233. PubMed ID: 35414692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The early COVID-19 pandemic and democratic attitudes.
    Lupu N; Zechmeister EJ
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(6):e0253485. PubMed ID: 34157050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Between everyday politics and political elites: transmission and coupling within Westminster's parliamentary e-petitions system.
    Matthews F
    Br Politics; 2023; 18(2):279-299. PubMed ID: 37168140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Health and politics in pandemic times: COVID-19 responses in Ethiopia.
    Østebø MT; Østebø T; Tronvoll K
    Health Policy Plan; 2021 Nov; 36(10):1681-1689. PubMed ID: 34350456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Efficiency in the governance of the Covid-19 pandemic: political and territorial factors.
    Martínez-Córdoba PJ; Benito B; García-Sánchez IM
    Global Health; 2021 Sep; 17(1):113. PubMed ID: 34548073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Why do democracies respond differently to COVID-19? A comparison of the United States and South Korea.
    Mao Y
    Front Public Health; 2023; 11():1285552. PubMed ID: 38288425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Depoliticising the political: Market solutions and the retreat of Swedish institutional drug treatment from state management.
    Edman J
    Int J Drug Policy; 2016 Jun; 32():93-9. PubMed ID: 27184217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Centralizing and decentralizing governance in the COVID-19 pandemic: The politics of credit and blame.
    Greer SL; Rozenblum S; Falkenbach M; Löblová O; Jarman H; Williams N; Wismar M
    Health Policy; 2022 May; 126(5):408-417. PubMed ID: 35331575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Asymmetries between national articulation and the autonomy of state governments in implementing health technologies to fight COVID-19 in Argentina].
    Hasdeu S; Beliera A; Alvarez J; Sanchez-Viamonte J
    Cad Saude Publica; 2024; 40(4):e00117923. PubMed ID: 38695457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.