BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37832922)

  • 1. Application of flow cytometry for rapid, high-throughput, multiparametric analysis of environmental microbiomes.
    Priyadarsini M; Kushwaha J; Pandey KP; Rani J; Dhoble AS
    J Microbiol Methods; 2023 Nov; 214():106841. PubMed ID: 37832922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A novel high-throughput multi-parameter flow cytometry based method for monitoring and rapid characterization of microbiome dynamics in anaerobic systems.
    Dhoble AS; Bekal S; Dolatowski W; Yanz C; Lambert KN; Bhalerao KD
    Bioresour Technol; 2016 Nov; 220():566-571. PubMed ID: 27614579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Personalized microbiome dynamics - Cytometric fingerprints for routine diagnostics.
    Koch C; Müller S
    Mol Aspects Med; 2018 Feb; 59():123-134. PubMed ID: 28669592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. When FLOW-FISH met FACS: Combining multiparametric, dynamic approaches for microbial single-cell research in the total environment.
    Pereira AC; Tenreiro A; Cunha MV
    Sci Total Environ; 2022 Feb; 806(Pt 2):150682. PubMed ID: 34600998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Predicting the Presence and Abundance of Bacterial Taxa in Environmental Communities through Flow Cytometric Fingerprinting.
    Heyse J; Schattenberg F; Rubbens P; Müller S; Waegeman W; Boon N; Props R
    mSystems; 2021 Oct; 6(5):e0055121. PubMed ID: 34546074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Flow cytometry community fingerprinting and amplicon sequencing for the assessment of landfill leachate cellulolytic bioaugmentation.
    Kinet R; Dzaomuho P; Baert J; Taminiau B; Daube G; Nezer C; Brostaux Y; Nguyen F; Dumont G; Thonart P; Delvigne F
    Bioresour Technol; 2016 Aug; 214():450-459. PubMed ID: 27160955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Characterizing Microbiome Dynamics - Flow Cytometry Based Workflows from Pure Cultures to Natural Communities.
    Lambrecht J; Schattenberg F; Harms H; Mueller S
    J Vis Exp; 2018 Jul; (137):. PubMed ID: 30059034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Towards Quantitative Microbiome Community Profiling Using Internal Standards.
    Lin Y; Gifford S; Ducklow H; Schofield O; Cassar N
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2019 Mar; 85(5):. PubMed ID: 30552195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Use of flow cytometric methods for single-cell analysis in environmental microbiology.
    Czechowska K; Johnson DR; van der Meer JR
    Curr Opin Microbiol; 2008 Jun; 11(3):205-12. PubMed ID: 18562243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Machine learning analysis of microbial flow cytometry data from nanoparticles, antibiotics and carbon sources perturbed anaerobic microbiomes.
    Dhoble AS; Lahiri P; Bhalerao KD
    J Biol Eng; 2018; 12():19. PubMed ID: 30220912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How to Count Our Microbes? The Effect of Different Quantitative Microbiome Profiling Approaches.
    Galazzo G; van Best N; Benedikter BJ; Janssen K; Bervoets L; Driessen C; Oomen M; Lucchesi M; van Eijck PH; Becker HEF; Hornef MW; Savelkoul PH; Stassen FRM; Wolffs PF; Penders J
    Front Cell Infect Microbiol; 2020; 10():403. PubMed ID: 32850498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Flow cytometry for microbial sensing in environmental sustainability applications: current status and future prospects.
    Gruden C; Skerlos S; Adriaens P
    FEMS Microbiol Ecol; 2004 Jul; 49(1):37-49. PubMed ID: 19712382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Flow cytometric fingerprinting for microbial strain discrimination and physiological characterization.
    Buysschaert B; Kerckhof FM; Vandamme P; De Baets B; Boon N
    Cytometry A; 2018 Feb; 93(2):201-212. PubMed ID: 29266796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A cytometric approach to follow variation and dynamics of the salivary microbiota.
    van Gelder S; Röhrig N; Schattenberg F; Cichocki N; Schumann J; Schmalz G; Haak R; Ziebolz D; Müller S
    Methods; 2018 Feb; 134-135():67-79. PubMed ID: 28842259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Flow cytometric techniques for the detection of microorganisms.
    Davey HM
    Methods Cell Sci; 2002; 24(1-3):91-7. PubMed ID: 12815297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Using phage display selected antibodies to dissect microbiomes for complete de novo genome sequencing of low abundance microbes.
    Close DW; Ferrara F; Dichosa AE; Kumar S; Daughton AR; Daligault HE; Reitenga KG; Velappan N; Sanchez TC; Iyer S; Kiss C; Han CS; Bradbury AR
    BMC Microbiol; 2013 Nov; 13():270. PubMed ID: 24279426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. PhenoGMM: Gaussian Mixture Modeling of Cytometry Data Quantifies Changes in Microbial Community Structure.
    Rubbens P; Props R; Kerckhof FM; Boon N; Waegeman W
    mSphere; 2021 Feb; 6(1):. PubMed ID: 33536320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Rapid detection and online analysis of microbial changes through flow cytometry.
    Kupschus J; Janssen S; Hoek A; Kuska J; Rathjens J; Sonntag C; Ickstadt K; Budzinski L; Chang HD; Rossi A; Esser C; Hochrath K
    Cytometry A; 2023 May; 103(5):419-428. PubMed ID: 36354152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.