These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37833641)

  • 1. Covariate balance-related propensity score weighting in estimating overall hazard ratio with distributed survival data.
    Huang C; Wei K; Wang C; Yu Y; Qin G
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Oct; 23(1):233. PubMed ID: 37833641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validity of Privacy-Protecting Analytical Methods That Use Only Aggregate-Level Information to Conduct Multivariable-Adjusted Analysis in Distributed Data Networks.
    Li X; Fireman BH; Curtis JR; Arterburn DE; Fisher DP; Moyneur É; Gallagher M; Raebel MA; Nowell WB; Lagreid L; Toh S
    Am J Epidemiol; 2019 Apr; 188(4):709-723. PubMed ID: 30535131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of privacy-protecting analytic and data-sharing methods: A simulation study.
    Yoshida K; Gruber S; Fireman BH; Toh S
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2018 Sep; 27(9):1034-1041. PubMed ID: 30022561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Combining Super Learner with high-dimensional propensity score to improve confounding adjustment: A real-world application in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.
    Dhopeshwarkar N; Yang W; Hennessy S; Rhodes JM; Cuker A; Leonard CE
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2024 Jan; 33(1):e5678. PubMed ID: 37609668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prognostic score-based model averaging approach for propensity score estimation.
    Kabata D; Stuart EA; Shintani A
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2024 Oct; 24(1):228. PubMed ID: 39363252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Propensity score analysis methods with balancing constraints: A Monte Carlo study.
    Li Y; Li L
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2021 Apr; 30(4):1119-1142. PubMed ID: 33525962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Estimating the marginal hazard ratio by simultaneously using a set of propensity score models: A multiply robust approach.
    Shu D; Han P; Wang R; Toh S
    Stat Med; 2021 Feb; 40(5):1224-1242. PubMed ID: 33410157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of two propensity score-based methods for balancing covariates: the overlap weighting and fine stratification methods in real-world claims data.
    Wan W; Murugesan M; Nocon RS; Bolton J; Konetzka RT; Chin MH; Huang ES
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2024 Jun; 24(1):122. PubMed ID: 38831393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Genetic matching for time-dependent treatments: a longitudinal extension and simulation study.
    Weymann D; Chan B; Regier DA
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Aug; 23(1):181. PubMed ID: 37559105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multiply robust estimator for the difference in survival functions using pseudo-observations.
    Wang C; Wei K; Huang C; Yu Y; Qin G
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Oct; 23(1):247. PubMed ID: 37872495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimating causal effects for survival (time-to-event) outcomes by combining classification tree analysis and propensity score weighting.
    Linden A; Yarnold PR
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2018 Apr; 24(2):380-387. PubMed ID: 29230910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Inverse probability weighted Cox model in multi-site studies without sharing individual-level data.
    Shu D; Yoshida K; Fireman BH; Toh S
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Jun; 29(6):1668-1681. PubMed ID: 31448681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Propensity score analysis with local balance.
    Li Y; Li L
    Stat Med; 2023 Jul; 42(15):2637-2660. PubMed ID: 37012676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Distributed Cox proportional hazards regression using summary-level information.
    Li D; Lu W; Shu D; Toh S; Wang R
    Biostatistics; 2023 Jul; 24(3):776-794. PubMed ID: 35195675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The performance of different propensity score methods for estimating marginal hazard ratios.
    Austin PC
    Stat Med; 2013 Jul; 32(16):2837-49. PubMed ID: 23239115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Minimizing confounding in comparative observational studies with time-to-event outcomes: An extensive comparison of covariate balancing methods using Monte Carlo simulation.
    Cafri G; Fortin S; Austin PC
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2024 Aug; 33(8):1437-1460. PubMed ID: 39053570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Performance of modeling and balancing approach methods when using weights to estimate treatment effects in observational time-to-event settings.
    Barros GWF; Eriksson M; Häggström J
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(12):e0289316. PubMed ID: 38060567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Covariate-adjusted survival analyses in propensity-score matched samples: Imputing potential time-to-event outcomes.
    Austin PC; Thomas N; Rubin DB
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Mar; 29(3):728-751. PubMed ID: 30569832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bias associated with using the estimated propensity score as a regression covariate.
    Hade EM; Lu B
    Stat Med; 2014 Jan; 33(1):74-87. PubMed ID: 23787715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.