200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37833773)
1. Evaluation of the accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography image segmentation of isolated tooth roots based on the dynamic threshold method.
Su S; Liu YM; Zhan LP; Gao SY; He C; Zhang Q; Huang XF
BMC Oral Health; 2023 Oct; 23(1):752. PubMed ID: 37833773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Monitoring of typodont root movement via crown superimposition of single cone-beam computed tomography and consecutive intraoral scans.
Lee RJ; Pham J; Choy M; Weissheimer A; Dougherty HL; Sameshima GT; Tong H
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Mar; 145(3):399-409. PubMed ID: 24582031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [A method for rapid extracting three-dimensional root model of vivo tooth from cone beam computed tomography data based on the anatomical characteristics of periodontal ligament].
Zhao YJ; Wang SW; Liu Y; Wang Y
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2017 Feb; 49(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 28203004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Automatic tooth roots segmentation of cone beam computed tomography image sequences using U-net and RNN.
Li Q; Chen K; Han L; Zhuang Y; Li J; Lin J
J Xray Sci Technol; 2020; 28(5):905-922. PubMed ID: 32986647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of tooth root surface area using a three-dimensional scanning technique and cone beam computed tomographic reconstruction in vitro.
Wang T; Pei X; Luo F; Jia L; Qin H; Cheng X; Xue Y; Wang J; Wan Q
Arch Oral Biol; 2017 Dec; 84():13-18. PubMed ID: 28934648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A novel three-dimensional quantitative assessment method for abnormal root morphology of the maxillary premolars in vivo on cone-beam computed tomography.
Liu J; Xu X; Wang XE; Jia PC; Pan MQ; Xu L
BMC Oral Health; 2022 Jun; 22(1):229. PubMed ID: 35681195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy Assessment of Three-dimensional Surface Reconstructions of In vivo Teeth from Cone-beam Computed Tomography.
Sang YH; Hu HC; Lu SH; Wu YW; Li WR; Tang ZH
Chin Med J (Engl); 2016 Jun; 129(12):1464-70. PubMed ID: 27270544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [A tooth cone beam computer tomography image segmentation method based on the local Gaussian distribution fitting].
Liu S; Wang Y
Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Apr; 36(2):291-297. PubMed ID: 31016947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of in situ cone beam computed tomography scan data with ex vivo optical scan data in the measurement of root surface area.
Jia P; Yang G; Hu W; Chung KH; Zhao Y; Liu M; Chen CS
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2019 Nov; 128(5):552-557. PubMed ID: 31171483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Photoacoustic tomography versus cone-beam computed tomography versus micro-computed tomography: Accuracy of 3D reconstructions of human teeth.
Schneider SJM; Höhne C; Schneider M; Schmitter M
PLoS One; 2022; 17(12):e0274818. PubMed ID: 36534651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Three-dimensional monitoring of root movement during orthodontic treatment.
Lee RJ; Weissheimer A; Pham J; Go L; de Menezes LM; Redmond WR; Loos JF; Sameshima GT; Tong H
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Jan; 147(1):132-42. PubMed ID: 25533080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Validation of a windowing protocol for accurate in vivo tooth segmentation using i-CAT cone beam computed tomography.
Rastegar B; Thumilaire B; Odri GA; Siciliano S; Zapała J; Mahy P; Olszewski R
Adv Clin Exp Med; 2018 Jul; 27(7):1001-1008. PubMed ID: 29999253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of dental fillings and tooth type on the performance of a novel artificial intelligence-driven tool for automatic tooth segmentation on CBCT images - A validation study.
Fontenele RC; Gerhardt MDN; Pinto JC; Van Gerven A; Willems H; Jacobs R; Freitas DQ
J Dent; 2022 Apr; 119():104069. PubMed ID: 35183696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Deep convolutional neural network-based automated segmentation and classification of teeth with orthodontic brackets on cone-beam computed-tomographic images: a validation study.
Ayidh Alqahtani K; Jacobs R; Smolders A; Van Gerven A; Willems H; Shujaat S; Shaheen E
Eur J Orthod; 2023 Mar; 45(2):169-174. PubMed ID: 36099419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Tooth and root size as determined from 0.25- and 0.30-mm voxel size cone-beam CT imaging when contrasted to micro-CT scans (0.06 mm): An ex vivo study.
Coutsiers Morell GF; Berlin-Broner Y; Flores-Mir C; Heo G
J Orthod; 2022 Jun; 49(2):174-178. PubMed ID: 34903069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The detection of periapical pathosis using digital periapical radiography and cone beam computed tomography - part 2: a 1-year post-treatment follow-up.
Patel S; Wilson R; Dawood A; Foschi F; Mannocci F
Int Endod J; 2012 Aug; 45(8):711-23. PubMed ID: 22775142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of in vitro mandibular volumetric measurements from CBCT of different voxel sizes with different segmentation threshold settings.
Dong T; Xia L; Cai C; Yuan L; Ye N; Fang B
BMC Oral Health; 2019 Sep; 19(1):206. PubMed ID: 31484529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Three-rooted premolar analyzed by high-resolution and cone beam CT.
Marca C; Dummer PM; Bryant S; Vier-Pelisser FV; Só MV; Fontanella V; Dutra VD; de Figueiredo JA
Clin Oral Investig; 2013 Jul; 17(6):1535-40. PubMed ID: 22993113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impacts of Thresholds of Gray Value for Cone-Beam Computed Tomography 3D Reconstruction on the Accuracy of Image Matching with Optical Scan.
Park SW; Yoon RG; Lee H; Lee HJ; Choi YD; Lee DH
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Sep; 17(17):. PubMed ID: 32882986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of voxel size on the accuracy of 3D reconstructions with cone beam CT.
Maret D; Telmon N; Peters OA; Lepage B; Treil J; Inglèse JM; Peyre A; Kahn JL; Sixou M
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2012 Dec; 41(8):649-55. PubMed ID: 23166362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
