These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37835690)

  • 1. Stakeholder Challenges and Opportunities of GPS Shock Collars to Achieve Optimum Welfare in a Conservation or Farm Setting.
    McCormick IA; Stokes JE
    Animals (Basel); 2023 Oct; 13(19):. PubMed ID: 37835690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How do grazing beef and dairy cattle respond to virtual fences? A review.
    Wilms L; Komainda M; Hamidi D; Riesch F; Horn J; Isselstein J
    J Anim Sci; 2024 Jan; 102():. PubMed ID: 38619181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Heifers don't care: no evidence of negative impact on animal welfare of growing heifers when using virtual fences compared to physical fences for grazing.
    Hamidi D; Grinnell NA; Komainda M; Riesch F; Horn J; Ammer S; Traulsen I; Palme R; Hamidi M; Isselstein J
    Animal; 2022 Sep; 16(9):100614. PubMed ID: 35985122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The potential of virtual fencing technology to facilitate sustainable livestock grazing management.
    Schillings J; Holohan C; Lively F; Arnott G; Russell T
    Animal; 2024 Aug; 18(8):101231. PubMed ID: 39053155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Review: Precision Livestock Farming technologies in pasture-based livestock systems.
    Aquilani C; Confessore A; Bozzi R; Sirtori F; Pugliese C
    Animal; 2022 Jan; 16(1):100429. PubMed ID: 34953277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Animal Welfare Implications of Digital Tools for Monitoring and Management of Cattle and Sheep on Pasture.
    Herlin A; Brunberg E; Hultgren J; Högberg N; Rydberg A; Skarin A
    Animals (Basel); 2021 Mar; 11(3):. PubMed ID: 33804235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Use of GPS tracking collars and accelerometers for rangeland livestock production research.
    Bailey DW; Trotter MG; Knight CW; Thomas MG
    Transl Anim Sci; 2018 Feb; 2(1):81-88. PubMed ID: 32704691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Perceptions of farming stakeholders towards automating dairy cattle mobility and body condition scoring in farm assurance schemes.
    Schillings J; Bennett R; Rose DC
    Animal; 2023 May; 17(5):100786. PubMed ID: 37075533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Virtual fencing technology to intensively graze lactating dairy cattle. II: Effects on cow welfare and behavior.
    Verdon M; Langworthy A; Rawnsley R
    J Dairy Sci; 2021 Jun; 104(6):7084-7094. PubMed ID: 33814145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Is Virtual Fencing an Effective Way of Enclosing Cattle? Personality, Herd Behaviour and Welfare.
    Aaser MF; Staahltoft SK; Korsgaard AH; Trige-Esbensen A; Alstrup AKO; Sonne C; Pertoldi C; Bruhn D; Frikke J; Linder AC
    Animals (Basel); 2022 Mar; 12(7):. PubMed ID: 35405832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The ability of ewes with lambs to learn a virtual fencing system.
    Brunberg EI; Bergslid IK; Bøe KE; Sørheim KM
    Animal; 2017 Nov; 11(11):2045-2050. PubMed ID: 28490388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Technical note: assessing GPS sensor accuracy using real-time kinematic device for livestock tracking.
    Zhao B; McDermott RL; Erickson GE; Xiong Y
    J Anim Sci; 2024 Jan; 102():. PubMed ID: 39187979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Modern Virtual Fencing Application: Monitoring and Controlling Behavior of Goats Using GPS Collars and Warning Signals.
    Muminov A; Na D; Lee C; Kang HK; Jeon HS
    Sensors (Basel); 2019 Apr; 19(7):. PubMed ID: 30987020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Tech-Savvy Beef Cattle? How Heifers Respond to Moving Virtual Fence Lines.
    Campbell DLM; Lea JM; Farrer WJ; Haynes SJ; Lee C
    Animals (Basel); 2017 Sep; 7(9):. PubMed ID: 28926989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Are there risk factors commonly observed on Australian farms where the welfare of livestock is poor?
    Williams N; Hemsworth L; Chaplin S; Shephard R; Fisher A
    Anim Welf; 2024; 33():e34. PubMed ID: 39315351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Slope and distance from buildings are easy-to-retrieve proxies for estimating livestock site-use intensity in alpine summer pastures.
    Pittarello M; Ravetto Enri S; Lonati M; Lombardi G
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(11):e0259120. PubMed ID: 34731206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Does cattle and sheep grazing under best management significantly elevate sediment losses? Evidence from the North Wyke Farm Platform, UK.
    Pulley S; Cardenas LM; Grau P; Mullan S; Rivero MJ; Collins AL
    J Soils Sediments; 2021; 21(4):1875-1889. PubMed ID: 34720744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Diffusion of precision livestock farming technologies in dairy cattle farms.
    Bianchi MC; Bava L; Sandrucci A; Tangorra FM; Tamburini A; Gislon G; Zucali M
    Animal; 2022 Nov; 16(11):100650. PubMed ID: 36220000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessing herbivore foraging behavior with GPS collars in a semiarid grassland.
    Augustine DJ; Derner JD
    Sensors (Basel); 2013 Mar; 13(3):3711-23. PubMed ID: 23503296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Virtual Fencing Is Comparable to Electric Tape Fencing for Cattle Behavior and Welfare.
    Campbell DLM; Lea JM; Keshavarzi H; Lee C
    Front Vet Sci; 2019; 6():445. PubMed ID: 31921906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.