These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37836967)

  • 1. One Definition to Join Them All: The N-Spherical Solution for the EEG Lead Field.
    Bruña R; Fuggetta G; Pereda E
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Sep; 23(19):. PubMed ID: 37836967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Anisotropic spherical head model and its application to imaging electric activity of the brain.
    Petrov Y
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2012 Jul; 86(1 Pt 1):011917. PubMed ID: 23005462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Multiregion bicentric-spheres models of the head for the simulation of bioelectric phenomena.
    Vatta F; Bruno P; Inchingolo P
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Mar; 52(3):384-9. PubMed ID: 15759568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A common formalism for the integral formulations of the forward EEG problem.
    Kybic J; Clerc M; Abboud T; Faugeras O; Keriven R; Papadopoulo T
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2005 Jan; 24(1):12-28. PubMed ID: 15638183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Development of volume conductor and source models to localize epileptic foci.
    Fuchs M; Wagner M; Kastner J
    J Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Apr; 24(2):101-19. PubMed ID: 17414966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The New York Head-A precise standardized volume conductor model for EEG source localization and tES targeting.
    Huang Y; Parra LC; Haufe S
    Neuroimage; 2016 Oct; 140():150-62. PubMed ID: 26706450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A realistic, accurate and fast source modeling approach for the EEG forward problem.
    Miinalainen T; Rezaei A; Us D; Nüßing A; Engwer C; Wolters CH; Pursiainen S
    Neuroimage; 2019 Jan; 184():56-67. PubMed ID: 30165251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Review on solving the forward problem in EEG source analysis.
    Hallez H; Vanrumste B; Grech R; Muscat J; De Clercq W; Vergult A; D'Asseler Y; Camilleri KP; Fabri SG; Van Huffel S; Lemahieu I
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2007 Nov; 4():46. PubMed ID: 18053144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Conventional and reciprocal approaches to the inverse dipole localization problem of electroencephalography.
    Finke S; Gulrajani RM; Gotman J
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2003 Jun; 50(6):657-66. PubMed ID: 12814232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison between realistic and spherical approaches in EEG forward modelling.
    Meneghini F; Vatta F; Esposito F; Mininel S; Di Salle F
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2010 Jun; 55(3):133-46. PubMed ID: 20178450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Computational modeling of human head electromagnetics for source localization of milliscale brain dynamics.
    Malony AD; Salman A; Turovets S; Tucker D; Volkov V; Li K; Song JE; Biersdorff S; Davey C; Hoge C; Hammond D
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2011; 163():329-35. PubMed ID: 21335813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Models and computation methods of EEG forward problem].
    Zhang Y; Zou L; Zhu S
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2004 Apr; 21(2):337-9. PubMed ID: 15143572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Brainstorm-DUNEuro: An integrated and user-friendly Finite Element Method for modeling electromagnetic brain activity.
    Medani T; Garcia-Prieto J; Tadel F; Antonakakis M; Erdbrügger T; Höltershinken M; Mead W; Schrader S; Joshi A; Engwer C; Wolters CH; Mosher JC; Leahy RM
    Neuroimage; 2023 Feb; 267():119851. PubMed ID: 36599389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Application of quasi-static magnetic reciprocity to finite element models of the MEG lead-field.
    Schimpf PH
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 Nov; 54(11):2082-8. PubMed ID: 18018704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of the head model on EEG and MEG source connectivity analyses.
    Cho JH; Vorwerk J; Wolters CH; Knösche TR
    Neuroimage; 2015 Apr; 110():60-77. PubMed ID: 25638756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of skull anisotropy for the forward and inverse problem in EEG: simulation studies using FEM on realistic head models.
    Marin G; Guerin C; Baillet S; Garnero L; Meunier G
    Hum Brain Mapp; 1998; 6(4):250-69. PubMed ID: 9704264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A simple method for EEG guided transcranial electrical stimulation without models.
    Cancelli A; Cottone C; Tecchio F; Truong DQ; Dmochowski J; Bikson M
    J Neural Eng; 2016 Jun; 13(3):036022. PubMed ID: 27172063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A finite-element reciprocity solution for EEG forward modeling with realistic individual head models.
    Ziegler E; Chellappa SL; Gaggioni G; Ly JQM; Vandewalle G; André E; Geuzaine C; Phillips C
    Neuroimage; 2014 Dec; 103():542-551. PubMed ID: 25204867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. High-resolution EEG mapping: an equivalent charge-layer approach.
    Yao D
    Phys Med Biol; 2003 Jul; 48(13):1997-2011. PubMed ID: 12884931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. High-resolution EEG mapping: a radial-basis function based approach to the scalp Laplacian estimate.
    Yao D
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2002 Jun; 113(6):956-67. PubMed ID: 12048057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.