These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37837037)

  • 41. Automatic tongue image quality assessment using a multi-task deep learning model.
    Xian H; Xie Y; Yang Z; Zhang L; Li S; Shang H; Zhou W; Zhang H
    Front Physiol; 2022; 13():966214. PubMed ID: 36203936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. An Edge-Based Selection Method for Improving Regions-of-Interest Localizations Obtained Using Multiple Deep Learning Object-Detection Models in Breast Ultrasound Images.
    Daoud MI; Al-Ali A; Alazrai R; Al-Najar MS; Alsaify BA; Ali MZ; Alouneh S
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Sep; 22(18):. PubMed ID: 36146070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. AD-DETR: DETR with asymmetrical relation and decoupled attention in crowded scenes.
    Huang Y; Yuan G
    Math Biosci Eng; 2023 Jun; 20(8):14158-14179. PubMed ID: 37679130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Blind Deep S3D Image Quality Evaluation via Local to Global Feature Aggregation.
    Heeseok Oh ; Sewoong Ahn ; Jongyoo Kim ; Sanghoon Lee
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2017 Oct; 26(10):4923-4936. PubMed ID: 28708557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Learning a No-Reference Quality Assessment Model of Enhanced Images With Big Data.
    Gu K; Tao D; Qiao JF; Lin W
    IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst; 2018 Apr; 29(4):1301-1313. PubMed ID: 28287984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Subjective and Objective Quality Assessment of Swimming Pool Images.
    Lei F; Li S; Xie S; Liu J
    Front Neurosci; 2021; 15():766762. PubMed ID: 35087371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Object recognition in medical images via anatomy-guided deep learning.
    Jin C; Udupa JK; Zhao L; Tong Y; Odhner D; Pednekar G; Nag S; Lewis S; Poole N; Mannikeri S; Govindasamy S; Singh A; Camaratta J; Owens S; Torigian DA
    Med Image Anal; 2022 Oct; 81():102527. PubMed ID: 35830745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Fine-Grained Quality Assessment for Compressed Images.
    Zhang X; Lin W; Wang S; Liu J; Ma S; Gao W
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2019 Mar; 28(3):1163-1175. PubMed ID: 30296227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. An Optimization-Based Family of Predictive, Fusion-Based Models for Full-Reference Image Quality Assessment.
    Varga D
    J Imaging; 2023 Jun; 9(6):. PubMed ID: 37367464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Dynamic Receptive Field Generation for Full-Reference Image Quality Assessment.
    Kim W; Nguyen AD; Lee S; Bovik AC
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2020 Jan; ():. PubMed ID: 31995494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. A method for the evaluation of image quality according to the recognition effectiveness of objects in the optical remote sensing image using machine learning algorithm.
    Yuan T; Zheng X; Hu X; Zhou W; Wang W
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(1):e86528. PubMed ID: 24489739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Two-Stream Convolutional Networks for Blind Image Quality Assessment.
    Yan Q; Gong D; Zhang Y
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2019 May; 28(5):2200-2211. PubMed ID: 30507506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Image Quality Assessment Using Contrastive Learning.
    Madhusudana PC; Birkbeck N; Wang Y; Adsumilli B; Bovik AC
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2022; 31():4149-4161. PubMed ID: 35700254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. A Spatial and Geometry Feature-Based Quality Assessment Model for the Light Field Images.
    Huang H; Zeng H; Hou J; Chen J; Zhu J; Ma KK
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2022; 31():3765-3779. PubMed ID: 35604974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. An artificial intelligence-driven image quality assessment system for whole-body [
    Qi C; Wang S; Yu H; Zhang Y; Hu P; Tan H; Shi Y; Shi H
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2023 Apr; 50(5):1318-1328. PubMed ID: 36529840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Threat Object-based anomaly detection in X-ray images using GAN-based ensembles.
    Kolte S; Bhowmik N; Dhiraj
    Neural Comput Appl; 2022 Dec; ():1-16. PubMed ID: 36532881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Comparison of Full-Reference Image Quality Models for Optimization of Image Processing Systems.
    Ding K; Ma K; Wang S; Simoncelli EP
    Int J Comput Vis; 2021; 129(4):1258-1281. PubMed ID: 33495671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. FEA-Swin: Foreground Enhancement Attention Swin Transformer Network for Accurate UAV-Based Dense Object Detection.
    Xu W; Zhang C; Wang Q; Dai P
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Sep; 22(18):. PubMed ID: 36146340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. No-reference image quality assessment for confocal endoscopy images with perceptual local descriptor.
    Dong X; Fu L; Liu Q
    J Biomed Opt; 2022 May; 27(5):. PubMed ID: 35585672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Meta-DETR: Image-Level Few-Shot Detection With Inter-Class Correlation Exploitation.
    Zhang G; Luo Z; Cui K; Lu S; Xing EP
    IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell; 2023 Nov; 45(11):12832-12843. PubMed ID: 35917572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.