These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37837224)

  • 1. Variation in local population size predicts social network structure in wild songbirds.
    Beck KB; Farine DR; Firth JA; Sheldon BC
    J Anim Ecol; 2023 Dec; 92(12):2348-2362. PubMed ID: 37837224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of competition and predation operating at individual and population levels: an overview of results from a long-term field experiment.
    Dhondt AA
    Oecologia; 2023 Dec; 203(3-4):277-296. PubMed ID: 37773450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Social dynamics of core members in mixed-species bird flocks change across a gradient of foraging habitat quality.
    Gentry Richardson KE; Roche DP; Mugel SG; Lancaster ND; Sieving KE; Freeberg TM; Lucas JR
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(2):e0262385. PubMed ID: 35108278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Social and spatial effects on genetic variation between foraging flocks in a wild bird population.
    Radersma R; Garroway CJ; Santure AW; de Cauwer I; Farine DR; Slate J; Sheldon BC
    Mol Ecol; 2017 Oct; 26(20):5807-5819. PubMed ID: 28792645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Wild birds respond to flockmate loss by increasing their social network associations to others.
    Firth JA; Voelkl B; Crates RA; Aplin LM; Biro D; Croft DP; Sheldon BC
    Proc Biol Sci; 2017 May; 284(1854):. PubMed ID: 28515203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Experimental Evidence that Social Relationships Determine Individual Foraging Behavior.
    Firth JA; Voelkl B; Farine DR; Sheldon BC
    Curr Biol; 2015 Dec; 25(23):3138-43. PubMed ID: 26585280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Intraspecific variation in group size in the blackbuck antelope: the roles of habitat structure and forage at different spatial scales.
    Isvaran K
    Oecologia; 2007 Nov; 154(2):435-44. PubMed ID: 17786484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Individual personalities predict social behaviour in wild networks of great tits (Parus major).
    Aplin LM; Farine DR; Morand-Ferron J; Cole EF; Cockburn A; Sheldon BC
    Ecol Lett; 2013 Nov; 16(11):1365-72. PubMed ID: 24047530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Social carry-over effects underpin trans-seasonally linked structure in a wild bird population.
    Firth JA; Sheldon BC
    Ecol Lett; 2016 Nov; 19(11):1324-1332. PubMed ID: 27623746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Specialization and niche overlap across spatial scales: Revealing ecological factors shaping species richness and coexistence in Australian songbirds.
    Harmáčková L; Remešová E; Remeš V
    J Anim Ecol; 2019 Nov; 88(11):1766-1776. PubMed ID: 31329280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Social learning in birds and its role in shaping a foraging niche.
    Slagsvold T; Wiebe KL
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2011 Apr; 366(1567):969-77. PubMed ID: 21357219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mixed-species flock sizes and compositions influence flock members' success in three field experiments with novel feeders.
    Freeberg TM; Adams CB; Price CA; Papeş M
    PLoS One; 2024; 19(5):e0301270. PubMed ID: 38722951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Social environment affects juvenile dispersal in great tits (Parus major).
    Nicolaus M; Michler SP; Jalvingh KM; Ubels R; van der Velde M; Komdeur J; Both C; Tinbergen JM
    J Anim Ecol; 2012 Jul; 81(4):827-37. PubMed ID: 22309249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Do habitat preferences improve fitness? Context-specific adaptive habitat selection by a grassland songbird.
    Maresh Nelson SB; Coon JJ; Miller JR
    Oecologia; 2020 May; 193(1):15-26. PubMed ID: 32201907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Consistent individual differences in the social phenotypes of wild great tits,
    Aplin LM; Firth JA; Farine DR; Voelkl B; Crates RA; Culina A; Garroway CJ; Hinde CA; Kidd LR; Psorakis I; Milligan ND; Radersma R; Verhelst BL; Sheldon BC
    Anim Behav; 2015 Oct; 108():117-127. PubMed ID: 26512142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Habitat selection and metapopulation structure: a multi-year study of distribution of the Hodgson's pipit, Anthus Hodgsoni Richm. (Aves, Passeriformes)].
    Burskiĭ OV
    Zh Obshch Biol; 2008; 69(5):323-43. PubMed ID: 18956571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Home range size of willow tits: a response to winter habitat loss.
    Siffczyk C; Brotons L; Kangas K; Orell M
    Oecologia; 2003 Aug; 136(4):635-42. PubMed ID: 12845515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. To graze or gorge: consistency and flexibility of individual foraging tactics in tits.
    Milligan ND; Radersma R; Cole EF; Sheldon BC
    J Anim Ecol; 2017 Jul; 86(4):826-836. PubMed ID: 28191628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Niche shift in three foraging insectivorous birds in lowland Malaysian forest patches.
    Mansor MS; Nor SM; Ramli R; Sah SAM
    Behav Processes; 2018 Dec; 157():73-79. PubMed ID: 30193765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Species interactions and population density mediate the use of social cues for habitat selection.
    Fletcher RJ
    J Anim Ecol; 2007 May; 76(3):598-606. PubMed ID: 17439476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.