These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
259 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37837325)
1. Collecting Physicians' Preferences on Medical Devices: Are We Doing It Right? Evidence from Italian Orthopedists Using 2 Different Stated Preference Methods. Armeni P; Meregaglia M; Borsoi L; Callea G; Torbica A; Benazzo F; Tarricone R Med Decis Making; 2023; 43(7-8):886-900. PubMed ID: 37837325 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Australian Public Preferences for the Funding of New Health Technologies: A Comparison of Discrete Choice and Profile Case Best-Worst Scaling Methods. Whitty JA; Ratcliffe J; Chen G; Scuffham PA Med Decis Making; 2014 Jul; 34(5):638-54. PubMed ID: 24713695 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparing the Self-Reported Acceptability of Discrete Choice Experiment and Best-Worst Scaling: An Empirical Study in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Li F; Liu S; Gu Y; Li S; Tao Y; Wei Y; Chen Y Patient Prefer Adherence; 2024; 18():1803-1813. PubMed ID: 39229369 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A think aloud study comparing the validity and acceptability of discrete choice and best worst scaling methods. Whitty JA; Walker R; Golenko X; Ratcliffe J PLoS One; 2014; 9(4):e90635. PubMed ID: 24759637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Women's preferences for attributes of first-trimester miscarriage management: a stated preference discrete-choice experiment. Petrou S; McIntosh E Value Health; 2009 Jun; 12(4):551-9. PubMed ID: 18798807 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An Empirical Comparison of Discrete Choice Experiment and Best-Worst Scaling to Estimate Stakeholders' Risk Tolerance for Hip Replacement Surgery. van Dijk JD; Groothuis-Oudshoorn CG; Marshall DA; IJzerman MJ Value Health; 2016 Jun; 19(4):316-22. PubMed ID: 27325322 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. What Do Patients Want from Otolaryngologists? A Discrete Choice Experiment. Naunheim MR; Rathi VK; Naunheim ML; Alkire BC; Lam AC; Song PC; Shrime MG Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2017 Oct; 157(4):618-624. PubMed ID: 28675119 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Analysis of physicians' perspectives versus patients' preferences: direct assessment and discrete choice experiments in the therapy of multiple myeloma. Mühlbacher AC; Nübling M Eur J Health Econ; 2011 Jun; 12(3):193-203. PubMed ID: 20107856 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Systematic Review Comparing the Acceptability, Validity and Concordance of Discrete Choice Experiments and Best-Worst Scaling for Eliciting Preferences in Healthcare. Whitty JA; Oliveira Gonçalves AS Patient; 2018 Jun; 11(3):301-317. PubMed ID: 29177797 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Is Best-Worst Scaling Suitable for Health State Valuation? A Comparison with Discrete Choice Experiments. Krucien N; Watson V; Ryan M Health Econ; 2017 Dec; 26(12):e1-e16. PubMed ID: 27917560 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Patients' Preferences for Artificial Intelligence Applications Versus Clinicians in Disease Diagnosis During the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic in China: Discrete Choice Experiment. Liu T; Tsang W; Huang F; Lau OY; Chen Y; Sheng J; Guo Y; Akinwunmi B; Zhang CJ; Ming WK J Med Internet Res; 2021 Feb; 23(2):e22841. PubMed ID: 33493130 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Older adult patient preferences for the content and format of prescription medication labels - A best-worst scaling and discrete choice experiment study. Malhotra R; Suppiah SD; Tan YW; Sung P; Tay SSC; Tan NC; Koh GC; Chan A; Chew LST; Ozdemir S; Res Social Adm Pharm; 2023 Nov; 19(11):1455-1464. PubMed ID: 37507340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparing Outcomes of a Discrete Choice Experiment and Case 2 Best-Worst Scaling: An Application to Neuromuscular Disease Treatment. Soekhai V; Donkers B; Johansson JV; Jimenez-Moreno C; Pinto CA; de Wit GA; de Bekker-Grob E Patient; 2023 May; 16(3):239-253. PubMed ID: 36781628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Patient preferences for osteoarthritis pain and chronic low back pain treatments in the United States: a discrete-choice experiment. Turk D; Boeri M; Abraham L; Atkinson J; Bushmakin AG; Cappelleri JC; Hauber B; Klein K; Russo L; Viktrup L; Walsh D Osteoarthritis Cartilage; 2020 Sep; 28(9):1202-1213. PubMed ID: 32652238 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Patient versus physician preferences for lipid-lowering drug therapy: A discrete choice experiment. Zhang L; Chen J; Cao Z; Zhang M; Ma R; Zhang P; Yao G; Li X Health Expect; 2024 Apr; 27(2):e14043. PubMed ID: 38590082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Discrete choice experiment versus swing-weighting: A head-to-head comparison of diabetic patient preferences for glucose-monitoring devices. Whichello C; Smith I; Veldwijk J; de Wit GA; Rutten-van Molken MPMH; de Bekker-Grob EW PLoS One; 2023; 18(7):e0283926. PubMed ID: 37506078 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Preferences for public involvement in health service decisions: a comparison between best-worst scaling and trio-wise stated preference elicitation techniques. Erdem S; Campbell D Eur J Health Econ; 2017 Dec; 18(9):1107-1123. PubMed ID: 27942967 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Using a discrete choice experiment to elicit patients' preferences and willingness-to-pay for knee osteoarthritis treatments in Thailand. Luksameesate P; Tanavalee A; Ngorsuraches S; Taychakhoonavudh S Sci Rep; 2023 Jul; 13(1):12154. PubMed ID: 37500677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]